Dossier: Upscaling of Fluid Flow in Oil Reservoirs
Open Access
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP
Volume 59, Number 2, March-April 2004
Dossier: Upscaling of Fluid Flow in Oil Reservoirs
Page(s) 167 - 183
Published online 01 December 2006
  • Jacquard, P. and Jain, C. (1965) Permeability distribution from field pressure data. Soc. Pet. Eng. J., 5(4):281-294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chavent, G., Dupuy, M. and Lemonnier, P. (1975) History matching by use of optimal control. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 74-86, 15(1):74--86. [Google Scholar]
  • Gavalas, G.R. and Shah, P.C. (1976) Reservoir history matching by bayesian estimation. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 337-350, 16(6):337-350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliver, D.S. (1989) The averaging process in permeability estimation from well test data. Number SPE 19845, pages 813-833, San Antonio. [Google Scholar]
  • Alabert, F.G. (1989) Constraining description of randomly heterogeneous reservoirs to pressure test data: A monte carlo study. Number SPE 19600, pages 207-221, San Antonio. [Google Scholar]
  • Sagar, R.K. (1993) Reservoir description by integration of well test data and spatial statistics. PhD thesis, University of Tulsa. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun, N.Z. (1993) Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modeling. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Yeh, W.W.G.,Yoon, Y.S. and Lee, K.S. (1981) Aquifer parameter identification with kriging and optimum parametrization. Water Resources Research, 17(3):664-672. [Google Scholar]
  • Deutsch, C.V. and Journel, A.G. (1992) Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Eschard, R., Doligez, B., Rahon, D., Ravenne, C. and Leloch, G. A new approach for reservoirs description and simulation using geostatistical methods. Edinburg, 21/22 February 1991. [Google Scholar]
  • Yadavalli, S.K., Roadifer, R.D., Jones, J.R., Krase, L.D. and Yeh, N.S. Use of pressure transient data to obtain geostatistical parameters for reservoir characterization. Number SPE 28432, pages 719-732, New Orleans, LA, September 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • Yadavalli, S.K., Jones, J.R., Krase, L.D., Yeh, N.S. and Roadifer, R.D. Use of pressure transient data to estimate permeability variograms. Number SPE 30587, pages 599-608, Dallas, October 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • Feitosa, G. (1993) Well test analysis for heterogeneous reservoirs. PhD thesis, University of Tulsa. [Google Scholar]
  • Yortsos, T.C. Estimation of permeability variogram from stochastic analysis of pressure transients of multiple wells in heterogeneous reservoirs. Number SPE 36510, pages 599-608, Denver, Colorado, October 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Dagan, G. (1989) Flow and Transport in Porous Formations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • Carrera, J. and Neuman, S.P. (1986) Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1.maximum likelihood method incorporating prior information. Water Resources Research, 22(2):225-233. [Google Scholar]
  • Kitanidis, P.K. (1996) On the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem. Advances in Water Resources, 31(10):2411-2419. [Google Scholar]
  • Kitanidis, P.K. (1995) Quasi-linear geostatistical theory for inversing. Water Resources Research, 31(10):2411-2419. [Google Scholar]
  • Kitanidis, P.K. and Vomvoris, E. (1983) A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one-dimensional simulation. Water Resources Research, 19(3):677-690. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoeksema, R.J. and Kitanidis, P.K. (1984) An application of the geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in two-dimensional groundwater modeling. Water Resources Research, 20(7):1003-1020. [Google Scholar]
  • Daviau, F. (1986) Interprétation des essais de puits. Éditions Technip. [Google Scholar]
  • Horne, R.N. (1990) Modern well test analysis. Petroway. [Google Scholar]
  • Kruel Romeu, R. (1994) écoulementscoulements en milieux hétérogënes : prise de moyenne de perméabilité régime permanent et transitoire. PhD thesis, Universitè de Paris VI. [Google Scholar]
  • Bourdarot, G. (1996) Essais de puits : méthodes d'interprétation. Éditions Technip. [Google Scholar]
  • Gelhar, L.W. (1993) Stochastic Subsurface Hydrology. Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • Indelman, P. (1996) Averaging of unsteady flow in heterogeneous media of stationary conductivity. J. Fluid. Mech., 310:39-60. [Google Scholar]
  • Noetinger, B. and Gautier, Y. (1998) Use of the fourier-laplace transform and of diagrammatical methods to interpret pumping tests in heterogeneous media. Advances in Water Resources, 21:581-590. [Google Scholar]
  • Matheron, G. (1967) Eléments pour une théorie des milieux poreux. Masson, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Hoeksema, R.J. and Kitanidis, P.K. (1985) Analysis of the spatial structure of properties of selected aquifers. Water Resources Research, 21(4):563-572. [Google Scholar]
  • Carrera, J. and Neuman, S.P. (1986) Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady state conditions: 1. Uniqueness, stability, and solution algorithms. Water Resources Research, 22(2):211-227. [Google Scholar]
  • Gautier, Y. (1997) Estimation de paramètres géostatistiques à partir de tests de puits. PhD thesis, Université Paris VI. [Google Scholar]
  • Blanc, G., Guérillot, D., Rahon, D. and Roggero, F. Building geostatistical models constrained by dynamic data- a posteriori constraint. Number SPE 35478, pages 19_33, Stavanger, Norway, April 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • Noetinger, B. and Kruel Romeu, R. (1994) About the influence of the transmissibility evaluation rule about the results of fluid flow simulations in heterogeneous reservoirs. Water Resources Research. [Google Scholar]
  • Tarantola, A. (1987) Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • Priestley, M.B. (1987) Spectral Analysis and Time Series. Academic Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.