Regular Article
Numerical parametric study of a cooling system for an LNG storage tank
CFDTP, National School of Engineers of Sfax (ENIS), 3038, Tunisia
^{*} Corresponding author: haddar.mohamed@gmail.com
Received:
31
July
2018
Accepted:
10
December
2018
The study of the cooling system of a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) storage tank is vital for the safety of the installation. The objective of this paper is to develop cooling baffles capable of reducing the heat gain from the environment leading to a loss of LNG quantity, keeping the BoilOff Gas (BOG) under control. For this purpose, a specific code based on the finite volume method was developed to improve our knowledge of the hydrodynamic and thermal behaviors of LNG in the cylindrical tank. In addition, the effect of the number, position and dimension of the baffles on the flow structure of LNG were determined. The obtained results indicated that the location of the baffles at the top of the tank nearby the vicinity of the wall would yield a better cooling of the LNG. Moreover, we emphasized that a number of six baffles would give rise to a better heat transfer. For a design purpose, the Nusselt numbers on the lateral surface and on the baffles have been correlated as functions of Rayleigh and baffle numbers.
© M. Haddar et al., published by IFP Energies nouvelles, 2019
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nomenclature
H : Height of LNG inside the tank [m]
: Average heat transfer coefficient [W m^{−2} K^{−1}]
u , v , w : Velocity components [m s^{−1}]
Dimensionless variables
r, θ, z : Dimensionless cylindrical coordinates
u, v, w : Dimensionless velocity components
Dimensionless numbers
Ra : Rayleigh number, gβΔT_{ 0 } H^{ 3 } /αυ
Greek symbols
α : Thermal diffusivity [m^{2} s^{−1}]
β : Thermal coefficient of expansion [K^{−1}]
λ : Thermal conductivity [W m^{−1} K^{−1}]
υ : Kinematic viscosity [m^{2} s^{−1}]
φ_{ l } : Lateral heat flux density [W m^{−2}]
Subscripts
1 Introduction
Natural gas has proven to be a reliable and efficient energy source that burns much cleaner than other fossil fuels. It plays the role of a safe fuel in a small package. It is condensed to a liquid by cooling it to about −162 °C at atmospheric pressure, reducing its volume by a factor of 600 similar [1]. Afterwards, LNG is transported by ship to terminals and then stored in superinsulated tanks. Since the storage tank cannot have a perfect insulation, heat is transferred to LNG due to the large temperature gap between the inside of the tank and the ambient [2]. The heat gains, through the tank walls, cause an increase of the LNG temperature leading to a loss of LNG quantity [3], as BoilOff Gas (BOG), by a continuous vaporization.
Previous 2D convection studies, in a cylindrical enclosure, looked at the problem from a numerical [4–6], an experimental [7, 8] or a combination of experimental, analytical and numerical perspectives [9]. Papanicolaou, and Belessiotis [5], in particular, investigated the behavior of natural convection in a cylindrical enclosure at the boundary between laminar and turbulent flow numerically. Different turbulence models were tested and the twolayer model agreed well with experimental results at a moderated Rayleigh number (Ra ≤ 10^{5}). Other researchers [10–13] dealt with three dimensional laminar natural convection problems. More specifically, Schneider and Straub [12] demonstrated by a numerical study and experimentally verified the dependence of the flow field and the heat transfer on the inclination angle of the cylinder.
Concerning the reservoir cooling application, De Césaro Oliveski [14] conducted a twodimensional work to study the transient cooling process in a vertical cylindrical tank and presented a new correlation for the Nusselt number at high Prandtl number based on aspect ratio, external overall heat transfer coefficient and Grashof number. Moreover, Rodríguez et al. [15] developed a parametric study to understand the unsteady natural convection phenomena inside a vertical storage tank during the cooling process using a nondimensional method.
Closely related to LNG tank problems, an early study was conducted to investigate the rate of heat gain at steady state in LNG storage tanks by using two mathematical models [16]. It was concluded that the optimal aspect ratio (H/R) should approximately be the unity for minimal heat gain and, by decreasing the fullness factor (the LNG volume occupied percentage, Z/H), a significant increase of the heat gain rate would occur.
Recently, Khelifi Touhami et al. [17] studied laminar natural convection in a storage tank filled with LNG using a numerical method based on the twodimensional approach. These researchers aimed to understand the evaporation problem occurring in an LNG tank by conducting a parametric study. Their main finding was that the increase of the Rayleigh number at constant aspect ratio, or the reduction of aspect ratio at a constant Rayleigh, enhanced the heat transfer. In addition, due to this heat gain, it was observed that the evaporative flux was maximum near the wall and minimum at the free surface center. Furthermore, in the light of the steady state study, Roh and Son [18] investigated the natural convection in a Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) tank using the commercial CFD software FLUENT. Their major results revealed that heat transfer rate was strongly related to liquidsolid contact area. In addition, this heat transfer was essentially caused by the liquid region rather than by the vapor region.
In order to avoid fuel losses, some authors proposed the reliquefaction of the BOG instead of burning it off [19, 20]. Liu et al. [20] proposed a reliquefying system using the nitrogen liquid. This cooling fluid enters the heat exchanger to reliquefy the BOG and then the LNG is reinjected into the storage tank. However, very little information is available on solutions based on abating the effect of the heat ingress on the tanks. Therefore, the main purpose of this paper is to attempt to prevent the LNG temperature increase before the formation of the BOG. This would be possible through the creation of baffles cooled with nitrogen that would remove the heat gain in the storage tank. This suggested solution represents compact cooling system integrated in the tank.
2 Mathematical formulation
2.1 Governing equations
In this work, the cylindrical storage tank, with an aspect ratio , is equipped with cooling baffles (the baffle number Nb = 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 or 12) uniformly distributed along the azimuthal direction. Taking into account the periodicity in the azimuthal direction and the symmetry conditions of the problem, the calculation domain is limited to a volume forming 1/(2Nb) of the tank (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1
Schematic of the LNG tank. 
In this study, the flow is treated as threedimensional and laminar, and the fluid, which corresponds to LNG (Tab. 1) [21], is supposed to be incompressible. The governing equations for steady natural convection, more specifically the continuity, the momentum and the energy equations with the standard Boussinesq approximation are used.
The nondimensionalized form of the governing equations can be expressed using the following variables: with and .
The final form of the dimensionless governing equations is then written as:
Energy equation:(3)with is the velocity vector (u, v, w).
These equations are exhaustively dealt with in Ghiaasiaan [22].
2.2 Boundary conditions
In this study, we suppose that heat is gained from the surrounding environment through lateral insulated surface of the LNG tank which is equipped with a cooling system. Hence, the main purpose is to reduce the heat gain in order to keep the LNG temperature under the saturation temperature and therefore limit the evaporation rate. Because there is no perfect insulation, heat is transferred into LNG through the insulation walls, which is ascribed to the large temperature differential between the fluid inside the tank and the ambient temperature.
In this present work, the reservoir is subjected to a constant heat flux density through the lateral wall, with adiabatic top and bottom surfaces:
On the bottom and top surfaces:(5)
On the other hand, the LNG heat gains are removed by baffles cooled with nitrogen. The temperature of the cooling liquid (nitrogen) is supposed to be constant. Therefore, the boundary condition at the baffles is:(6)
For all the rigid surface, noslip condition is used, and at the symmetry vertical planes (plane midway between two consecutive baffles) of the tank:(7)
3 Numerical method
3.1 General features
The numerical solution of the complete governing equations (1)–(3) is obtained using the finite volume method and the steady laminar regime is reached by way of the falsetransient regime method.
The computed domain is subdivided into a number of control volumes Ω defined in a cylindrical threedimensional coordinate. A staggered uniform mesh is used as the pressures and the temperatures are located at the middle of the control volumes. However, the velocities are situated on the faces of the control volumes. A hybrid scheme interpolation is used for the spatial discretization. The pressurevelocity coupling was handled by Patankar’s SIMPLE algorithm [23]. For temporal discretization, an implicit scheme of alternate directions of Douglas and Gunn [24] was adopted. A more detailed presentation of this resolution algorithm is shown in Figure 2.
Fig. 2
Flow chart representing the algorithm used to solve the problem. 
The convergence criterion for pressure, velocity and temperature solutions was set so that the residual fell below the tolerance of 10^{−6} and a dimensionless time step 10^{−5} was found to be sufficient for producing accurate results at reasonable computed time by respecting the constraint CFL_{max} < 1 in all simulations.
3.2 Grid independency
The simulation results (Ra = 10^{5}, Nb = 4, ) for three different mesh densities were compared to verify the grid dependency. Figure 3 shows the dimensionless velocity w and the dimensionless temperature T along r at z = 0.5. As shown in Figure 3, the simulation results obtained by fine (294 272 cells) and medium grids (87 856 cells) are quite identical. However, the coarse grid (18 772 cells) results present a discrepancy with the finer grid sizes. Hence, the medium grid was used in the remaining of simulations.
Fig. 3
Effect of mesh size on CFD results: (A) T and (B) w along r at z = 0.5. 
3.3 Numerical validation
Due to the lack of experimental studies in cylindrical enclosures, the numerical results of Lemembre and Petit [4] were adopted to validate our model under the same conditions (Ra = 10^{5}, Pr = 0.7, ().This two dimensional model is solved under these conditions: a heating lateral wall side, an adiabatic bottom condition and a uniformly cooled top surface in order to obtain a steadystate solution.
As illustrated in Figure 4A, the dimensionless temperature profile agrees well with that obtained by Lemembre, and Petit [4] using a uniform grid (70 × 70).As illustrated in Figure 4B, a good agreement was found between the computed dimensionless axial velocity along the radial position and that obtained by Lemembre and Petit [4].
Fig. 4
Distribution of T and w at Ra = 10^{5}; Pr = 0.7; Al = 1/2: (A) near the bottom at r = 0.5 and (B) near the wall at z = 0.5. 
4 Results and discussion
The thermoconvective behavior is studied in the LNG cylindrical tank subjected to the heat gain through the lateral wall and cooled by baffles. In function of a numerical simulation, this section will exhibit the main findings related to the effects of baffle position, dimension and number on the stored LNG temperature and flow. The results are given for a thermal Rayleigh number range (Ra = 10^{3}−10^{7}), fixed value of the Prandtl (Pr ≈ 2) and aspect ratio ().
4.1 Rayleigh number effect
Figure 5 exhibits the flow patterns as well as the temperature fields in a vertical plane at an angular position θ_{ a } = 1.2° from the baffle plane for Nb = 4 and different values of Ra (10^{3}, 10^{4}, 10^{5}).
Fig. 5
Velocity and temperature distributions in a vertical plane at θ_{a} = 1.2° for Nb = 4 and different values of Rayleigh: (A) Ra = 10^{3}, (B) Ra = 10^{4} and (C) Ra = 10^{5}. 
By comparing Figure 5A and B, it appears that the thermal gradient on top of the baffles is more accentuated for Ra = 10^{4}. Thus, when Ra = 10^{3}, the fluid, heated at the peripheral zone, passes over the baffles and moves downward near the cavity central axis. However, for Ra = 10^{4}, the LNG downs more rapidly and the primary recirculation zone size is reduced. In addition, the flow pattern changes completely when the Rayleigh number reaches 10^{5}. In fact, for Ra = 10^{5} a secondary recirculation zone appears in the middle of the tank.
Table 2 shows the Rayleigh number effects on the average and maximum dimensionless temperatures and the maximum dimensionless axial velocity when the tank is equipped with a fixed number of baffles (Nb = 4). It can be clearly observed that the more the Rayleigh number increases, the more intensive the buoyancydriven flow, generated by the vertical temperature gradient, becomes. Indeed, the dimensionless velocity increases fivefold from 0.0673 at Ra = 10^{5} to 0.3486 at Ra = 10^{7} (Tab. 2).
Rayleigh number effects on T_{av}, T_{max} and w_{max} for Nb = 4.
Simultaneously, with the Ra increase, the heat transfer is more important causing a drop of both average and maximum dimensionless temperature inside the LNG tank as is shown in Table 2. This decrease is approximately of 50% since the average temperature drops from 0.297 at Ra = 10^{5} to 0.137 and the maximum temperature drops from 0.635 to 0.349 at Ra = 10^{7}.
This finding is confirmed by the horizontal cross section at z = 0.5 for different Rayleigh numbers, exhibited in Figure 6. For instance, as can be clearly seen in Figure 6A, for Ra = 10^{3}, the heat transfer is dominant per conductive regime. Hence, at the sidewall of the tank, the isotherms are slightly distorted by the movement and the liquid temperature is significantly important. Indeed, as is shown in Table 2, the maximum dimensionless temperature T_{max} is equal to 0.899. However, as can be seen in Figure 6B and C, with Ra = 10^{4} and Ra = 10^{5}, the form of the isotherms changes indicating that the hot area along the tank sidewalls, caused by the upward buoyancy has become thinner and the central zone has grown more homogenous.
Fig. 6
Cross section of an LNG tank equipped with baffles: the effect of different Rayleigh numbers: (A) Ra = 10^{3}, (B) Ra = 10^{4} and (C) Ra = 10^{5}. 
4.2 Axial baffle position effect
To limit the LNG temperature increase and then the BOG, it is necessary to understand the baffle position effect on the thermoconvective behavior of the liquid inside the storage tank. For this purpose, three vertical positions of the baffle are studied: the bottom, the middle and the top of the tank while keeping the other three variables constant; namely, the Rayleigh number (Ra = 10^{5}), the aspect ratio () and the number of cooling systems (Nb = 4).
Figure 7A presents the first configuration where the baffle is at the bottom of the reservoir leading to the formation of thermal stratification at the top of the tank. This is due to the fact that warm LNG is lighter than the cold one. In addition, two recirculations appear; namely, the cold fluid next to the baffle moving downward and creating the first recirculation zone on the right. Secondly, on the left, located at the bottom side, another recirculation helps the formation of stratified fluid. Table 3 reveals that at this position the average temperature inside the tank rises drastically, T_{av} = 0.427 revealing an inefficient cooling of the liquid and indicating the possibility of the apparition of a new recirculation zone, at the top right side of the tank, where the temperature can reach T_{max} = 0.839.
Fig. 7
The effect of the top/bottom positions of the baffles on LNG; θ_{a} = 1.2°; Ra = 10^{5}; Nb = 4: (A) Bottom position, (B) Top position. 
Axial baffle position effect on T_{av} , T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5} and Nb = 4.
In contrast, Figure 7B shows a second configuration with the cooling system displaced to the top of the tank. This disposition clearly prevents the formation of the stratification at the top of the tank. This observation can be explained by the fact that with this new position, the fluid, which is getting warmer along the sidewall tank, is cooled by the baffle directly as soon as it reaches the top. The LNG with heavier density sinks down into the bottom of the tank reaching the strongest velocity of w_{max} = 0.0853 (Tab. 3). Thus, the fluid average temperature decreases inside the tank, T_{av} = 0.267. Hence, a homogeneous mixing of the LNG occurs resulting in an effective cooling for the liquid. This would minimize the impact of the heat gain transferred to the liquid from outside.
Thus, it can be concluded with much certainty that firstly, the fluid is well cooled around the baffle for the three positions. Secondly, the temperature of LNG inside the tank strongly depends on the baffle position as shown in Figures 5C, 7A and B. Thirdly, the optimum cooling yield can be obtained by installing baffles at the top of the tank. This would improve the cooling efficiency of the baffles via decreasing the maximum temperature by 34% as can be seen in Figure 7B. Finally, in addition to the efficiency in cooling, this position of the baffles can improve the motion fluidity of the liquid by up to 70% and prevent the stratification of LNG in the tank as can seen in Table 3.
4.3 Radial baffle position effect
Figure 8 presents two others configurations where the baffles are installed radially close to the tank axis (Fig. 8A) and at the middle of the tank (Fig. 8B). In addition, Table 4 exhibits the radial position effect on the average and maximum dimensionless temperatures and the maximum dimensionless axial velocity for the three radial positions. It can be clearly observed as we move the baffle toward the lateral wall, the recirculation zone close to the tank wall becomes smaller and the LNG, near the lateral wall, is colder (Figs. 7B, 8A and B).The hot zones, almost located near the lateral wall, shrink and the maximum temperature of the fluid inside the tank drops to reach T_{max} = 0.553 (Tab. 4). Thus, these hot zones which are located near the lateral wall, as confirmed by Khelifi Touhami et al. [17], are reduced when placing the baffle at that place. However, moving the baffles, radially far away from the lateral wall, would have less impact on minimizing the temperature inside the LNG tank and it would limit the role of the cooling system.
Fig. 8
The effect of the radial position on LNG; θ_{a} = 1.2°; Ra = 10^{5}; Nb = 4: (A) close to the tank axis, (B) at the center of the tank. 
Radial baffle position effect on T_{av,} T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5} and Nb = 4.
4.4 Baffle size effect
The effect of baffle size, especially the baffle height, on the thermoconvective behavior of LNG is studied. For this purpose, two others configurations were proposed: the first configuration (Fig. 9A) with a height equal to one and a half the height of top position configuration and the second configuration (Fig. 9B) with a height equal to twice the height of top position configuration.
Fig. 9
Effect of bafflesize on LNG tank. θ_{a} = 1.2°; Ra = 105; Nb = 4: (A) 1st configuration, (B) 2nd configuration. 
Figure 9 shows the effect of bafflesize increase on the temperature of LNG tanks. Although the baffle exchange surface is doubled, it contributes only a 13% decrease, as illustrated in Table 5. This poor contribution can be explained by the fact that increasing the dimension of the baffle exchange surface breaks the fluid movement and therefore, reduces the maximum velocity by 12% as shown in Table 5. Such a break would limit the temperature distribution in the LNG tank. Hence, it can be concluded that the baffle size has no significant effect on the temperature distribution inside the tank.
Baffle dimension effect on T_{av} , T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5} and Nb = 4.
4.5 Baffle number effect
Figure 10 displays dimensionless velocity and temperature fields in a vertical plane at a different angular position from the baffle plane and for different baffle numbers at a constant Rayleigh number Ra = 10^{5}. For Nb = 2, thermal stratification forms at the top of the tank as a result of the low temperature effect on LNG in the tank. Table 6 provides more details on the baffle number effects on the average and maximum dimensionless temperatures, for Ra = 10^{5}. It can be clearly seen that the greater the baffle number is, the lower the average and the maximum temperatures become.
Fig. 10
The effect of the number of baffles on the LNG at Ra = 10^{5}: (A) θ_{a} = 2.3°; Nb = 2, (B) θ_{a} = 1.5°; Nb = 3, (C) θ_{a} = 0.8°; Nb = 6, (D) θ_{a} = 0.4°; Nb = 12. 
Baffle number effects on T_{av} , T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5}.
For Nb ≤ 6, the representations confirm that every configuration has tworoll flows. The first one develops near the sidewall of the LNG tank. This roll flow can be ascribed to the fact that fluid, with light density, moves upward along the lateral wall of the tank. Therefore, LNG is cooled by the baffle and becomes heavier. Because of this fact, the fluid is forced to move downward. Consequently, a counterclockwise recirculation along the tank side wall is triggered. The second roll flow begins when the heavier cooled fluid reaches the bottom. Then, it changes direction moving upward in a clockwise direction along the tank axis. As it climbs up to reach the top, its temperature rises and it becomes lighter. At this stage, the LNG is cooled again by the baffle and the anticlockwise recirculation direction restarts.
However, for Nb > 6, the fluid maximum and average dimensionless temperatures drop significantly indicating that LNG has become almost homogenous. As a consequence, the fluid movement changes so that only one roll flow appears along the tank side wall.
Table 6 also exhibits the variation of maximum dimensionless axial velocity at Ra = 10^{5} for different numbers of baffles. It can be observed that the more baffles there are in the tank, the more enhanced dimensionless maximum velocity is obtained. This improvement in the velocity contributes to the LNG temperature decrease and to its homogenization. Nevertheless, for Nb = 12, the velocity drops indicating that the flow finds little space to move in.
On another scale, the increase of the number of baffles in the LNG tank reduces the space between them. Therefore, it will necessarily enhance the heat transfer between the cooling system and the fluid. Simultaneously, this increase of the number of baffle will necessarily reinforce the radial component of velocity at the expense of the angular one, which implies a better dynamics of the fluid. Moreover, by decreasing the number of baffles, and respectively increasing the distance between the cooling systems, less velocity intensity is observed especially far away from the baffle.
4.6 Nusselt number correlation
To better understand the heat transfer phenomena, it is interesting to study the average Nusselt number on the lateral surface Nu_{ l } and the average Nusselt number on the baffle Nu_{ b } for the top position case. These parameters are expressed as follows:
On the baffle:(9)with is the dimensionless width of baffle.
As shown in Figure 11, our results agree well with that obtained by Khelifi Touhami et al. [17]. In fact, Nu_{l} computed without baffle is a little greater than other cases due to the absence of baffles as obstacles. Hence, the LNG finds more space to move leading to high velocity intensity and an increase of LNG temperature inside the reservoir compared to other configurations. In the present of cooling systems, the fluid slows down as the baffle plays the role of an obstacle. When Rayleigh number is greater than 10^{4}, the global tendency is the decrease of lateral Nusselt number by increasing the baffle number. The Nu_{l} can be correlated using equation (10) established for different baffles number and 10^{4} ≤ Ra ≤ 10^{7} as follows:(10)
Fig. 11
Distribution of average lateral Nusselt number in function of Rayleigh number for various baffle numbers. 
In Figure 12, the graph presents the values of Nu_{b} indicating that heat transfer between the cooling system and the LNG is enhanced with increasing Ra. By ensuring more baffles and, thus, lowering temperature inside the tank, an effective cooling system is obtained. However, for Ra ≥ 10^{5} and by increasing baffle number, Nu_{b} decreases. For more understanding, a correlation has been established for Nu_{b} using equation (11) for 10^{4} ≤ Ra ≤ 10^{7} as follows:(11)
Fig. 12
Distribution of average Nusselt number on the baffle in function of Rayleigh number for various baffle numbers. 
5 Conclusion
This study attempted to numerically simulate the steady state of heat transfer in a storage tank filled with LNG and cooled by baffles. By using a cooling system to reduce the heat gain, it was expected to reduce the possibility of BOG occurring inside the storage tank and minimize the LNG loss.
Based on a threedimensional mass, momentum and energy conservation equations, which are solved in the cylindrical coordinates, a parametric study of steady state at laminar regime was investigated. The velocity and temperature distributions, for different Rayleigh numbers (Ra = 10^{3}, 10^{4}, 10^{5}) and for various baffle numbers (Nb = 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12), are presented and discussed. Additionally, the influence of the cooling baffle disposition and size, on the heat transfer, is studied to determine the optimal geometric conditions for the cooling system. Finally, for a design purpose, correlations were made for average Nusselt number Nu_{l} and Nu_{b} taking into account the number of baffles for 10^{4} ≤ Ra ≤ 10^{7}.
The main findings of the study can be summarized as follows. Firstly, it was observed that the heat gain acquired from the tank sidewalls causes the LNG to move upward. Simultaneously, the cold liquid sinks down under the effect of its weight increase caused by the lower temperature. The second finding was related to the effect of the increase of Ra. The fluid flow becomes more important. Therefore, the heat transfer between the baffles and the LNG is more significant causing the drop of both fluid average and maximum dimensionless temperatures inside the tank. The third important finding was about the optimum position of the baffles. This work revealed that the cooling system would be most efficient when placed at the top of the tank since it reduces the stratification zones of the LNG. The fourth finding revealed that for a constant Ra = 10^{5}, the increase of number of baffles from 2 to 12 did yield a significant decrease in the average dimensionless temperature inside the LNG tank as follows: from 2 to 4 baffles, a reduction of the average temperature by about 25% per one baffle is noticed, from 4 to 8 baffles, the average temperature drops by about 13% per one baffle and from 8 to 12 baffles, by adding 4 baffles a total drop by 44% is obtained. Thus, the average temperature decreases by about 11% per one baffle. Finally, for an efficient cooling system of an LNG tank, that would save LNG and reduce BOG, this work would recommend the installation of six top baffles near the wall of the tank.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Ayadi Hajji for his help with proofreading, editing and correcting the English of the manuscript.
References
 Chen Q.S., Wegrzyn J., Prasad V. (2004) Analysis of temperature and pressure changes in liquefied natural gas (LNG) cryogenic tanks, Cryogenics 44, 701–709. [Google Scholar]
 Ren J., Zhang H., Bi M., Yu J., Sun S. (2017) Numerical investigation of the coupled heat transfer of liquefied gas storage tanks, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 24222–24228. [Google Scholar]
 Zellouf Y., Portannier B. (2011) First step in optimizing LNG storages for offshore terminals, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 3, 582–590. [Google Scholar]
 Lemembre A., Petit J.P. (1998) Laminar natural convection in a laterally heated and upper cooled vertical cylindrical enclosure, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 41, 2437–2454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Papanicolaou E., Belessiotis V. (2002) Transient natural convection in a cylindrical enclosure at high Rayleigh, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 45, 1425–1444. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ginestet S., Le Bot C. (2018) Evaporation flow assessment from petroleum product storage tanks exposed to fire conditions, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 73, 27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Daney D.E. (1976) Turbulent natural convection of liquid deuterium, hydrogen and nitrogen within enclosed vessels, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 19, 431–441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Evans L.B., Reid R.C. (1968) Transient natural convection in vertical cylinder, AIChE J. 14, 251–259. [Google Scholar]
 Liang S.F., Vidal A., Acrivos A. (1969) Buoyancydriven convection in cylindrical geometries, J. Fluid Mech. 36, 239–256. [Google Scholar]
 Mallinson G.D., Davis G.D.V. (1977) Threedimensional natural convection in a box: A numerical study, J. Fluid Mech. 83, 11–38. [Google Scholar]
 Lee H.S., Jung J.H., Yoon H.S. (2013) A numerical study of three dimensional natural convection in a differentially heated cubical enclosure, Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Mechanics, Fluids, Heat, Elasticity and Electromagnetic Fields. [Google Scholar]
 Schneider S., Straub J. (1992) Laminar natural convection in a cylindrical enclosure with different end temperatures, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 35, 545–557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ma D.J., Henry D., Hadid H. Ben (2005) Threedimensional numerical study of natural convection in vertical cylinders partially heated from the side, Phys. Fluids 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
 De Césaro Oliveski R. (2013) Correlation for the cooling process of vertical storage tanks under natural convection for high Prandtl number, Int. J. Heat Mass Trans. 57, 292–298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rodríguez I., Castro J., PérezSegarra C.D., Oliva A. (2009) Unsteady numerical simulation of the cooling process of vertical storage tanks under laminar natural convection, Int. J. Therm. Sci. 48, 708–721. [Google Scholar]
 Jourda P., Probert S.D. (1991) Heattransfer considerations for large liquefiednaturalgas storage tanks, Appl. Energy 38, 263–282. [Google Scholar]
 Khelifi Touhami M.S., Benbrik A., Lemonnier D., Blay D. (2010) Laminar natural convection flow in a cylindrical cavity application to the storage of LNG, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 71, 126–132. [Google Scholar]
 Roh S., Son G. (2012) Numerical study of natural convection in a liquefied natural gas tank, J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 26, 3133–3140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Shin Y., Lee Y.P. (2009) Design of a boiloff natural gas reliquefaction control system for LNG carriers, Appl. Energy 86, 37–44. [Google Scholar]
 Liu S., Li X., Huo Y., Li H. (2015) An analysis of the primary energy consumed by the reliquefaction of boiloff gas of LNG storage tank, Energy Proc. 75, 3315–3321. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Guyer E.C., Brownell D.E. (1999) Handbook of applied thermal design, 2nd edn., Taylor & Francis, London. [Google Scholar]
 Ghiaasiaan S.M. (2011) Convective heat and mass transfer, Cambridge University Press, New York. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Patankar S. (1980) Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Series in computational methods in mechanics and thermal sciences, McGraw Hill, New York. [Google Scholar]
 Douglas J., Gunn J.E. (1964) A general formulation of alternating direction methods, Num. Math. 6, 428. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Axial baffle position effect on T_{av} , T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5} and Nb = 4.
Radial baffle position effect on T_{av,} T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5} and Nb = 4.
Baffle dimension effect on T_{av} , T_{max} and w_{max} for Ra = 10^{5} and Nb = 4.
All Figures
Fig. 1
Schematic of the LNG tank. 

In the text 
Fig. 2
Flow chart representing the algorithm used to solve the problem. 

In the text 
Fig. 3
Effect of mesh size on CFD results: (A) T and (B) w along r at z = 0.5. 

In the text 
Fig. 4
Distribution of T and w at Ra = 10^{5}; Pr = 0.7; Al = 1/2: (A) near the bottom at r = 0.5 and (B) near the wall at z = 0.5. 

In the text 
Fig. 5
Velocity and temperature distributions in a vertical plane at θ_{a} = 1.2° for Nb = 4 and different values of Rayleigh: (A) Ra = 10^{3}, (B) Ra = 10^{4} and (C) Ra = 10^{5}. 

In the text 
Fig. 6
Cross section of an LNG tank equipped with baffles: the effect of different Rayleigh numbers: (A) Ra = 10^{3}, (B) Ra = 10^{4} and (C) Ra = 10^{5}. 

In the text 
Fig. 7
The effect of the top/bottom positions of the baffles on LNG; θ_{a} = 1.2°; Ra = 10^{5}; Nb = 4: (A) Bottom position, (B) Top position. 

In the text 
Fig. 8
The effect of the radial position on LNG; θ_{a} = 1.2°; Ra = 10^{5}; Nb = 4: (A) close to the tank axis, (B) at the center of the tank. 

In the text 
Fig. 9
Effect of bafflesize on LNG tank. θ_{a} = 1.2°; Ra = 105; Nb = 4: (A) 1st configuration, (B) 2nd configuration. 

In the text 
Fig. 10
The effect of the number of baffles on the LNG at Ra = 10^{5}: (A) θ_{a} = 2.3°; Nb = 2, (B) θ_{a} = 1.5°; Nb = 3, (C) θ_{a} = 0.8°; Nb = 6, (D) θ_{a} = 0.4°; Nb = 12. 

In the text 
Fig. 11
Distribution of average lateral Nusselt number in function of Rayleigh number for various baffle numbers. 

In the text 
Fig. 12
Distribution of average Nusselt number on the baffle in function of Rayleigh number for various baffle numbers. 

In the text 