Open Access
Issue
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 72, Number 5, September–October 2017
Article Number 30
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2017027
Published online 20 October 2017

© O. Tursunov et al., published by IFP Energies nouvelles, 2017

Licence Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Worldwide energy consumption is rapidly amplifying due to the growth of economy and population. The dominant percentage of the energy is extracted via the incineration of non-renewable fossil fuels and resources, which definitely causes the production of greenhouse gases and extensive accumulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere which is one of the crucial reasons for global warming and climate change. First of all, the scholars from similar fields recognize the immensely high contribution of CO2 as a greenhouse gas to global warming and this was endorsed by the leaders of not only developed but also developing countries during the previous world summit for climate change.

Figure 1 presents the evolution of annual emissions of CO2 for the period between 1990 and 2014, as well as estimated carbon dioxide emissions to 2019. From the figure it can be observed that CO2 emissions are slowly expanding or quite stable until approximately 2002. Since 2003, there has been a sharp increasing trend which in particular overlaps with the increasing global temperatures and attenuating between the temperatures and the sunspot numbers. Friedlingstein et al. [1] report that the global greenhouse gas would continuously grow in 2014 to a level of approximately 65% above emissions in 1990. The rapid growth the level of carbon dioxide in ambient air might cause to uninhabitable and irreversible planet for our future generations. At the same time we need to undoubtedly increase our energy supply while reducing CO2 emissions is one of the essential challenges encountering our global society today. The worldwide CO2 emission should have to be diminished by 50–80% by 2050 in order to control the global mean temperature increase by 2–2.4 °C [2]. Hu et al. [3] state the global CO2 emission from the use of fossil fuels and cement production was 36 billion tones in 2013. Consequently, the robust and clean technologies for CO2 capture, storage and utilization are required at a large scale [4, 5]. Among the technologies, effective strategies in chemical (e.g. hydrogenation) conversion could play a considerable role in reduction CO2 emission [68].

Catalytic conversion of CO2 to methanol (CH3OH) is considered as a promising way that might offer a comprehensive solution to the issues of greenhouse gas control and depletion of fossil fuels respectively. Methanol is a significant starting product for a number of valuable chemicals and can be applied as a clean fuel and fuel additive. Additionally, it can also be converted into aromatics, ethylene, and propylene as well as to other value-added petrochemicals that are nowadays mainly derived extracted from crude oil [9]. Moreover, methanol was mainly applied as a starting feedstock in the chemical industries and it could also be an efficient sustainable and alternative synthetic fuel if anthropogenic CO2 and regenerative hydrogen are used as reagent for its synthesis. One of the most effective ways of accomplishing this goal is to explore high selective and active catalysts for methanol synthesis due to its thermodynamic stability of CO2.

Thus, this review paper discusses the process, namely methanol synthesis via hydrogenation of CO2. The review starts with accurate highlights regarding to CO2 hydrogenation to methanol, reaction mechanism, and continues with the effect of selected catalysts and the effect of operating parameters on H2/CO2 to methanol, as well as recent technological and industrial advances in this field.

thumbnail Figure 1

Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production by 2014 (black dotes) and estimates to 2019 (red dots) [1].

1 CO2 hydrogenation to methanol

Currently, comprehensive efforts and attentions are being paid on conversion of CO2 to methanol. Olah et al. [10] reported that CO2 hydrogenation to methanol, a new concept of “methanol economy” which relies on combination of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) with chemical recycling. Whereas renewable feedstock such as CO2 and water are abundantly available, the energy required for the synthetic carbon cycle can come from any source of alternative energy like wind, solar, nuclear, and geothermal energy. This alternative cycle offers a robust mechanism ensuring sustainable future for human beings when fossil fuels become deficient.

The major reactions for hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol are methanol synthesis (Eq. (1)) and water–gas-shift reaction (Eq. (2)). There is a possibility that CO formed from reaction (Eq. (2)) that incurs further hydrogenation to generate methanol (Eq. (3)) [11]. The methanol formation is an exothermal reaction with reduction of reaction molecule. Hence, the rise of pressure and the decrease of temperature should favor for the reaction from thermodynamical analysis. Nevertheless, taking into account the chemically inert nature of CO2 and the reaction rate, the amplification of reaction temperature (e.g. >240 °C) promotes activation of CO2 and then formation of methanol. The reverse water–gas-shift reaction leads to a reduction of methanol formation and causes extra consumption of hydrogen. Inui and Takeguchi [12] report that the large amount of water from by-product, from both the reverse water–gas-shift side reaction and synthesis of methanol, also had an inhibitory effect on the active metal during the reaction, thus leading to the catalyst deactivation. Consequently, synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation needs more selective catalysts in order to avoid the formation of unnecessary and undesired by-products. (1) (2) (3)

Li et al. [13] proclaim that catalysts applied in hydrogenation of CO2 are those used for synthesis of methanol from CO hydrogenation. Several research investigations [1417] have emphasized on the effects of catalyst type (e.g. surface area, morphology, supports and promoters), operating conditions, reactor type, etc. Indeed, catalysts with high efficiency are key factor for synthesis of methanol through CO2 hydrogenation. So far, the sustainable development of the catalyst is still not fully satisfactory in order to be applied for industrial applications due to the insufficient knowledge in catalytic design, properties and rational understanding of the CO2 hydrogenation mechanism. However, more large-scale research on catalytic activities, efficiency and practical upgrade of Cu- and Fe-based catalysts could break the above-mentioned gap in industrial application of CO2 hydrogenation to methanol.

1.1 Reaction mechanism

Due to significant complexity of methanol synthesis from hydrogenation of CO2, atomic level perception regarding to the reaction mechanism has been a lingering challenge. Liu et al. [18] state that so far, the key issues in the field, such as where and how CO2 is activated over the surface of the selected catalysts, remain infirm. The reaction mechanism has been initially discussed over Cu and oxides based catalysts [19, 20], which is still debatable. CO2 can adsorb on bare oxides and hydrogen can disassociate on copper species [21]. The active Cu species is principally present as Cu0 over Cu/ZrO2 based on X-ray diffraction measurements [22]. However, research group headed by Jansen et al. [23] proposed that Cu+ is the active component for Cu/ZnO/SiO2 catalyst employing static low energy ion scatter experiments. Liu et al. [24, 25] suggested that copper metal and low valence of Cu (Cu+ and Cuδ+) may affect the catalytic activity of Cu-based oxide catalysts. Most recent studies [2630] declare that resolution of the geometrical and electronic structures of the active site is the first step toward an efficient catalyst design with high selectivity and activity.

The redox mechanism involves the formation of CO via the Reverse-Water–Gas-Shift (RWGS) reaction and conventional synthesis gas to methanol conversion (Eq. (3)) [31]. As well as, the redox mechanism for the RWGS reaction can be easily modeled through the following scheme: (4) (5)

Cu0 atoms are certainly active to disassociate CO2, while the reduction of oxidized Cu catalyst has to be quicker than the process of oxidation [32, 33]. Hence, hydrogen is suggested to be a reducing reagent without direct involvement in the intermediates formation in the reverse-water–gas-shift reaction. The other reaction mechanism is the format decomposition/pathway, where the formation of HCOO intermediate is generally considered to be the rate-determining step [34, 35]. According to Tabatabaei et al. [36] the intermediate is a bidentate format on Cu, the most stable absorbed species. Chen et al. [3640] suggest that CO is formed from decomposition of format intermediate, deduced from unification of hydrogen (H2) with CO2. As well as, Sloczynski et al. [41] indicate that CO may be formed from decomposition of methanol, whereas the reverse-water–gas-shift mechanism can explain directly the CO formation as the major by product.

However, a few (critical amount) literatures were revealed on mechanisms for the reaction over Fe-based and oxides catalysts for methanol synthesis from hydrogenation of CO2. Most recent and current research investigations [4249] on reaction mechanism for Fe-based catalysts have been conducted for hydrocarbon, olefin and methane synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation process.

1.2 Effect of catalysts on CO2 hydrogenation to methanol

Since past few decades, many types of catalysts have been examined and investigated for the synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation. The majority of catalyst for hydrogenation of CO2 contains Cu as the main component along with different promoters or modifiers (Zn, Zr, Si, Al, Ti, Cr, Ga, Ce, etc.) [5052] and literatures on catalytic CO2 hydrogenation process containing Fe [53] for methanol synthesis have been found a very few. A proper support not only affects the stabilization and formation of the active phase of the catalyst but it is also able to control the interaction between the promoter and major component. Additionally, acidity and basicity characteristics of the catalyst are also determined by the selected support [18].

According to the research conducted by Deerattrakul et al. [54], 10 wt% CuZn/rGO catalyst performed the highest activity for the CO2 hydrogenation with a 26% CO2 conversion, 51% CH3OH selectivity, and 424 ± 18 mgMeOH at 250 °C and 15 bar after 5 h on stream of CO2 and H2. When the reaction was completed, the spent catalyst was re-evaluated its structure using XRD in order to examine the stability of rGO. The obtained pattern of XRD indicated that the catalyst still had the same structure as that of the initially used catalyst (see Fig. 2). When the loading was increased beyond 10 wt%, the conversion of CO2 and space–time yield of methanol (STYMeOH) decreased due to the agglomeration of active metals led to reduce copper oxides to metallic Cu0, which is a crucial active metal for synthesis of methanol [54]. As well as, Deerattrakul et al. [54] have mentioned that his results have given the highest STYMeOH under the lowest operating pressure comparing to previously published works [5658]. The rGO reduced by hydrazine played very significant role in the enhanced performance of the CuZn/rGO catalyst [54].

Liu et al. [58] tested the serials of Cu catalysts supported on TiO2 modified with different amount of MgO which were prepared through an impregnation method for synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation. During experimental investigation, the selectivity of methanol increased first and then decreased with amplifying the amount of MgO. A value of 55% was obtained over the Cu/5% supported MgO modified TiO2 catalyst, which enhanced by 86% compared with unmodified Cu/TiO2 catalyst sample. Regarding to CH3OH yield, it took on a volcanic variation trend with the addition of MgO, a maximum value of 1.97% was obtained over the Cu/1% supported MgO modified TiO2 catalyst, and the value increased by 54% comparing to the unmodified Cu/TiO2 catalyst [58]. This assures that the modification of TiO2 with an accurate amount of MgO is favorable for the improvement of the Cu/TiO2 catalytic feature.

Dong et al. [28] applied Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol prepared by precipitation–reduction method and reduced by different NaBH4, and the report emphasized that methanol and CO are the only carbon containing products under the reaction condition. As the catalytic activities for conversion of CO2 increased while CH3OH decreased with increasing temperature of reaction from 230 °C to 270 °C. Basically, increasing temperature promotes the conversion and activation of CO2, however, the CO production is more conducive than methanol because of the higher activation energy of RWGS reaction and endothermic character [59]. The catalysts prepared by precipitation–reduction method have shown an obvious advantage in methanol selectivity over the conventional Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalyst, especially at 230 °C. The CH3OH selectivity was 66.8% over Cu/ZnO/ZrO2-5 (5–the NaBH4/Cu molar ratio) sample at 230 °C, which is 12.7% higher than Cu/ZnO/ZrO2-0 (0–the NaBH4/Cu molar ratio) sample (see Fig. 3). A maximum STY of CH3OH of 0.21 g ml−1 h−1 with CO2 conversion of 23% and methanol selectivity of 56.8% was obtained over Cu/ZnO/ZrO2-5 at 270 °C.

Another example of catalytic CO2 hydrogenation to methanol using CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts prepared via a solvent-free routine was investigated by Lei et al. [27]. Six CZA (all with the same Cu/Zn/Al atomic ratio of 60/25/15) prepared using citric acid, oxalic acid or urea as fuel by combustion and mechanical milling method [27]. This research group has also indicated that methanol and CO were the only carbon containing products under the reaction conditions. With the same fuel/salts molar ratio, CZA-citric acid-1.00 (molar ratio) catalyst performed the highest activity for hydrogenation of CO2 with 14.6% conversion of CO2, perhaps because of the larger exposed Cu surface area and smaller particle size. The calculated STY of methanol reached 0.12 gMeOH/(gcat h), while the conversion of CO2 and STY of methanol decreased to 12.1% and 0.1 gMeOH/(gcat h) over CZA-oxalic acid-1.00. CZA-urea-1.00 has shown the lowest activity for hydrogenation of CO2 with 3.2% CO2 conversion and 0.022 gMeOH/(gcat h) STYMeOH, which could be resulted to the smaller exposed Cu surface area and larger particle size of CuO, and the formation of ZnAl2O4 [27]. Consequently, it was revealed that the CO2 conversion and STY of methanol increased with the added amount of citric acid during catalyst preparation and the maximum conversion of CO2 reached 16.2% over CZA-citric acid-1.25. Additionally, from above mentioned results, it can be inferred that Cu surface area is also one of the essential parameter for Cu/Zn/Al2O3 catalysts since it is related tightly to the catalytic activity of catalysts (see Fig. 4).

Regarding to Fe-based catalysts, Dorner et al. [60] report that low loading of ceria to a Fe–Mn/Al2O3 catalyst leads to a marginal improvement in conversion of CO2 and products selectivity, a decrease in reactivity was observed when the doping amount was increased to 10 wt%. Other additives such as Zn, Mg, Ru, Zr, and La have also been researched but promoting effect is nearly inappreciable [53, 6163]. Iron based catalysts dispersed on various supports have also been tested extensively and the product distributions are highly dependent on supporting materials [53]. The support tends to act completely as a stabilizer to avoid sintering of active particles during the reaction process. Usually, alumina executes efficiently, since it could prevent sintering as a result of the stable interaction or metal support, followed by titania and silica [53, 64, 65]. Dorner et al. [60] reported that the addition of ceria to a Fe/Mn-Al2O3 catalyst leaded to a marginal improvement in conversion of CO2 and product selectivity at low Ce-levels (2 wt%). During heavier doping, the effect of Ce on the overall conversion of CO2 is decreased, with 14% loss in the yield. Ceria forms on top of the Fe particles, leaded to the blocking of the chain-growth sites during hydrogenation of CO2, in the result, CO2 is instead converted to CO, that desorbs without being converted to valued-added products as a the chain-growth active site concentration has been decreased by the heavier doping of ceria. This is due to the fact that the chain-growth probability is not affected between the ceria-free and ceria containing catalyst [60]. According to Dubois et al. [66] investigation, hydrogenation of CO2 using transitional metal carbides, such as Fe3C and Mo2C indicated high conversion of CO2 and methanol selectivity at 220 °C. Nevertheless, more particular literature on comprehensive application of iron based catalyst for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation is still not sufficient and hence more profound scientific research is suggested to discover the hidden potential catalytic features Fe-based catalyst for methanol synthesis from hydrogenation of CO2.

The catalysts with high efficiency are the key for synthesis of methanol through hydrogenation of CO2. So far, comprehensive application of catalysts on industrial scale is still not fully satisfying due to the insufficient of the necessary knowledge in designing of catalysts for the mechanistic perception of CO2 hydrogenation and control of relevant catalytic properties.

thumbnail Figure 2

XRD patterns of (a) GO, (b) rGO, (c) calcined rGO, (d) 5% CuZn/rGO, (e) 10% CuZn/rGO, (f) 20% CuZn/rGO and (g) 30% CuZn/rGO [54].

thumbnail Figure 3

The relationship between CH3OH selectivity and the number of basic sites over Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts [28].

thumbnail Figure 4

The relationship between methanol yield and the exposed Cu surface area (reaction conditions: H2/CO2 = 3, T = 240 °C, P = 3.0 MPa, GHSV = 3600 h−1) [27].

1.3 Effect of operating parameters on H2/CO2 to methanol

In this section the effect of operating parameters on H2/CO2 to methanol has been evaluated based on the previous experimental investigations with the results as shown in Table 1. The table summarizes the effect type of catalysts, temperature, pressure and type of reactor on CO2 conversion (%), MeOH selectivity (%), MeOH yield (%) and STY of MeOH (gMeOH/gcat h).

Table 1

Summary of the effect of operating parameters on H2/CO2 to methanol.

2 Recent technological and industrial advances

The first pilot plant capacity of 50kg/h for methanol production from CO2 and H2 was constructed in 1996 in Japan with application of SiO2-modified CuO/ZnO catalyst. Recycling the feed extracted a STY of methanol yield approximately 600g/(L h), with selectivity of 99.9% over 8000h under operating conditions T = 250°C and 5MPa [71]. According to Tremblay [72], another pilot plant for production of methanol from CO2 and H2 with yearly capacity of 100tones is partially built by Mitsui Chemicals, Japan. In order to completely accomplish the construction and meet the target, H2 will be generated via photochemical water splitting using solar energy [72]. Since 2010, this particular pilot plant of Mitsui Chemical is under use at the R&D sites (Osaka Works) and currently synthesizes methanol, later used in the production of olefins, ethylene oxide, ethylene glycol and aromatics, using the CO2 emitted from factories and hydrogen obtained from water photolysis. One of the main millstones was achieved by Sud-Chemie and Lurgi AG institutions, they together developed a highly selective and active catalyst for methanol production from CO2 and H2 at temperature 260 °C [73]. Air Products Liquid Phase Conversion Company for the US DOE National Energy Technology Laboratory reported that for the first time, a liquid-phase synthesis of methanol was also developed, which is able to convert CO2 and H2 into methanol of nearby 95% with immensely high selectivity in a single pass. As stated by Shulenberger et al. [74], the first commercial CO2 into methanol recycling plant by using indigenously available inexpensive geothermal energy is currently under construction after felicitous pilot plant operation by the Carbon Recycling International Company in Iceland. This particular plant called “Emissions-to-Liquids” is based on CO2 conversion to vital by-products via integrated applications of indigenous industrial or geothermal energy sources, and hydrogen is produced via electrolysis of water [74]. Currently, the emissions-to-liquids methanol plant with nominal 50 000ton/yr methanol production capacity is under operation and is designed to utilize existing sources of clean CO2 or to process carbon dioxide from an emission sources, and is also constructed to produce its own H2 feedstock from electrolysis or to utilize by-product hydrogen from another industrial process. The technological practicability of methanol production from CO2 has also been highlighted in pilot plant applying two-step mechanistic approach, process reverse watergas-shift separate from synthesis of methanol or single-step mechanistic approach (the two stages combined in a single reactor) [16]. However, Centi and Perathoner [16] allege that the first mechanistic approach is preferential due to greater catalyst productivity, lower reactor size and gas recycles.

Since 2015, research scientists at the Laboratory of Nanochemisty and Ecology, National University of Science and Technology (MIS&S) in Moscow (Russia), have been donating massive efforts in development of novel nano-sized, hetero and homogeneous catalysts to activate CO2 [75, 76] in a reasonable, economically and ecologically efficient process for methanol production. Undoubtedly, all these extensive developments are immensely stimulating factors for sustainable development and for improvement of our environment.

Conclusion

Present work comprehensively highlighted recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol. From the research survey, it is inferred that a great number of catalytic studies on methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation have been focused on catalytic activities of Cu-based catalysts, while Fe-based catalysts indicated a contrary tendency. Cu-based catalysts along with various efficient promoters (e.g. Al, Ga, Si, Zr, etc.) are considerably useful. Accurately selected promoters and supports enhance the activity, stability and selectivity of the catalyst. Except promoters and support, higher surface area and smaller particle size of catalyst are considered as one of the most crucial factors for higher methanol yield production from hydrogenation of CO2.

Although several efforts have been made to upgrade and modify the technological progress of methanol synthesis from hydrogenation of CO2, the greatly effective process to enhance the conversion of CO2 is still pursued because of the thermodynamically stable nature of carbon dioxide molecule. Detailed research investigations on the catalyst sensitivities to admixtures, catalysts reaction performance under complex conditions are required. Moreover, the robust mechanism for synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation is not yet completely understood. As well as, as conversion of CO2 into value-added products or chemicals requires energy in the form of hydrogen or heat, alternative energy like biomass, wind, solar, geothermal and nuclear energy, is recommended to be applied instead of fossil fuel during conversion process. Besides, the future scientific undertaking have to focus to develop more highly efficient and “smart” catalysts, mechanisms and integrated process technology to encounter not only economic but also environmental challenges and to promote bio-based “green” economy.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation in the framework of Increase Competitiveness Program of NUST « MISiS » (No. K4-2016-054), implemented by a governmental decree dated 16th March 2013, N 211.

References

  • Friedlingstein P., Andrew R.M., Rogelj J., Peters G.P., Ganadell J.G., Knutti R., Luderer G., Raupach M.R., Schaeffer M., van Vuuren D.P., Le Quere C. (2014) Persistent growth of CO2 emissions and implications for reaching climate targets, J. Nat. Geosci. 7, 709–715. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Metz B., Davidson O.R., Bosch P.R., Meyer L.A. (eds.) (2007) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. (In the text)
  • Hu B., Guild C., Suib S.L. (2013) Thermal, electrochemical, and photochemical conversion of CO2 to fuels and value-added products, J. CO2 Util. 1, 18–27. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Bachu S. (2008) CO2 storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment, J. Progr. Energy Combust. Sci. 34, 254–273. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Song C. (2006) Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing, J. Catal. Today 115, 2–32. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Duong X., Li F., Zhao N., Xiao F., Wang J., Tan Y. (2016) CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts prepared by precipitation-reduction method, J. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 191, 8–17. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Angelo L., Kobl K., Tejada L.M.M., Zimmermann Y., Parkhomenko K., Roger A.C. (2015) Study of CuZnMOx oxides (M = Al, Zr, Ce, CeZr) for the catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 into methanol, J. C. R. Chimie 18, 250–260. [CrossRef]
  • Zhou X., Su T., Jiang Y., Qin Z., Ji H., Guo Z. (2016) CuO–Fe2O3–CeO2/HZSM-5 bifunctional catalyst hydrogenated CO2 for enhanced dimethyl ether synthesis, J. Chem. Eng. Sci. 153, 10–20. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Aresta M., Dibenedetto A., Angelini A. (2013) The changing paradigm in CO2 utilization, J. CO2 Util. 3–4, 65–73. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Olah G.A., Prakash G.K.S., Goeppert A. (2011) Anthropogenic chemical carbon cycle for a sustainable future, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 12881–12898. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Bansode A., Tidona B., von Rohr P.R., Urakawa A. (2013) Impact of K and Ba promoters on CO2 hydrogenation over CU/Al2O3 catalysts at high pressure, J. Catal. Sci. Technol. 3, 767–778. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Inui T., Takeguchi T. (1991) Effective conversion of carbon dioxide and hydrogen to hydrocarbons, J. Catal. Today 10, 95–106. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Li Y., Ma R., He L., Diao Z. (2014) Homogeneous hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to methanol, J. Catal. Sci. Technol. 4, 1498–1512. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Dai W.L., Luo S.L., Yin S.F., Au C.T. (2009) The direct transformation of carbon dioxide to organic carbonates over heterogeneous catalysts, J. Appl. Catal. A 366, 2–12. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Mikkelsen M., Jorgensen M., Krebs F.C. (2010) The teraton challenge. A review of fixation and transformation of carbon dioxide, J. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 43–81. [CrossRef]
  • Centi G., Perathoner S.J. (2009) Opportunities and prospects in the chemical recycling of carbon dioxide to fuels, J. Catal. Today 148, 191–205. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Zhang S., Chen Y., Li F., Lu X., Dai W., Mori R.J. (2006) Fixation and conversion of CO2 using ionic liquids, J. Catal. Today 115, 61–69. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Liu X., Lu G.Q., Yan Z., Beltramini J. (2003) Recent advances in catalysts for methanol synthesis via hydrogenation of CO and CO2, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 6518–6530. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Schild C., Wokaun A. (1990) On the mechanism of CO and CO2 hydrogenation reactions on zirconia-supported catalysts: a diffuse reflectance FTIR study: Part II. Surface species on copper/zirconia catalysts: implications for methanol synthesis selectivity, J. Mol. Catal. 63, 243–254. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Borodko Y., Somorjai G.A. (1999) Catalytic hydrogenation of carbon oxides – a 10-year perspective, J. Appl. Catal. A 186, 355–362. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Fisher I.A., Bell A.T. (1997) In-situ infrared study of methanol synthesis from H2/CO2 over Cu/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2/SiO2, J. Catal. 172, 222–237. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Koeppel R.A., Baiker A. (1992) Copper/zirconia catalysts for the synthesis of methanol from carbon dioxide: influence of preparation variables on structural and catalytic properties of catalysts, J. Appl. Catal. A 84, 77–102. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Jansen W.P.A., Beckers J., Heuvel J.C., Denier A.W., Bliek A., Brongersma H.H. (2002) Dynamic behavior of the surface structure of Cu/ZnO/SiO2 catalysts, J. Catal. 210, 229–236. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Liu X.M., Lu G.Q., Yan Z.F. (2005) Nanocrystalline zirconia as catalyst support in methanol synthesis, J. Appl. Catal. A 279, 241–245. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Liu S.H., Wang H.P., Wang H.C., Yang Y.W. (2005) In situ EXAFS studies of copper on ZrO2 during catalytic hydrogenation of CO2, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 144–147, 373–376. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Tang Q.L., Hong Q.J., Liu Z.P. (2009) CO2 fixation into methanol at Cu/ZrO2 interface from first principles kinetic Monte Carlo, J. Catal. 263, 114–122. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Lei H., Hou Z., Xie J. (2016) Hydrogenation of CO2 to CH3OH over CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts prepared via a solvent-free routine, J. Fuel 164, 191–198. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Dong X., Li F., Zhao N., Xiao F., Wang J., Tan Y. (2016) CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts prepared by precipitation-reduction method, J. Appl. Catal. B 191, 8–17. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Zhou X., Su T., Jiang Y., Qin Z., Ji H. (2016) CU–Fe2O3–CeO2/HZSM-5 bifunctional catalyst hydrogenated CO2 for enhanced dimethyl ether synthesis, J. Chem. Eng. Sci. 153, 10–20. [CrossRef]
  • Silva R.J., Pimentel A.F., Monteiro R.S., Mota J.A. (2016) Synthesis of methanol and dimethyl ether from the CO2 hydrogenation over Cu–ZnO supported on Al2O3 and Nb2O5, J. CO2 Util. 15, 83–88. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Weigel J., Koeppel R.A., Baiker A., Wokaun A. (1996) Surface Species in CO and CO2 hydrogenation over copper/zirconia: on the methanol synthesis mechanism, J. Langmuir 12, 5319–5329. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Fujita S.I., Usui M., Takezawa N. (1992) Mechanism of the reverse water gas shift reaction over Cu/ZnO catalyst, J. Catal. 134, 220–225. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Gines M.J.L., Marchi A.J., Apesteguia C.R. (1997) Kinetic study of the reverse water-gas shift reaction over CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts, J. Appl. Catal. A 154, 155–171. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Chiavassa D.L., Collins S.E., Bonivardi A.L., Baltanas M.A. (2009) Methanol synthesis from CO2/H2 using Ga2O3-Pd/silica catalysts: kinetic modeling, J. Chem. Eng. 150, 204–212. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Lim H.W., Park M.J., Kang S.H., Chae H.J., Bae J.W., Jun K.W. (2009) Modeling of the kinetics for methanol synthesis using Cu/ZnO/Al2O3/ZrO2 catalyst: influence of carbon dioxide during hydrogenation, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 10448–10455. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Chen C.S., Cheng W.H., Lin S.S. (2000) Mechanism of CO formation in reverse water-gas shift reaction over Cu/Al2O3 catalyst, J. Catal. Lett. 68, 45–48. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Chen C.S., Cheng W.H., Lin S.S. (2002) Study of reverse water gas shift reaction by TPD, TPR and CO2 hydrogenation over potassium-promoted Cu/SiO2 catalyst, J. Appl. Catal. A 238, 55–67. [CrossRef]
  • Chen C.S., Cheng W.H., Lin S.S. (2004) Study of iron-promoted Cu/SiO2 catalyst on high temperature reverse water gas shift reaction, J. Appl. Catal. A 257, 97–106. [CrossRef]
  • Chen C.S., Wu J.H., Lai T.W. (2010) Carbon dioxide hydrogenation on Cu nanoparticles, J. Phys. Chem. 114, 15021–12028.
  • Chen C., Ruan C., Zhan Y., Lin X., Zheng Q., Wei K. (2014) The significant role of oxygen vacancy in Cu/ZrO2 catalyst for enhancing water-gas-shift performance, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 39, 317–324. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Sloczynski J., Grabowski R., Kozlowska A., Olszewski P., lachowska M., Skrzypek J., Stoch J. (2003) Effect of Mg and Mn oxide additions on structural and adsorptive properties of Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts for the methanol synthesis from CO2, J. Appl. Catal. A 249, 129–138. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Nam S.S., Kim H., Kisham G., Choi M.J., Lee K.W. (1999) Catalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons over iron supported on alkali ion-exchanged Y-zeolite catalysts, J. Appl. Catal. A 179, 155–163. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Bakavoli M., Zamani Y., Akbarzadeh M. (2014) Study on the carbon dioxide hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over nanoparticles iron-based catalyst, J. Petrol. Coal. 56, 480–486.
  • Kiatphuengporn S., Jantaratana P., Limtrakul J., Chareonpanich M. (2016) Magnetic field-enhanced catalytic CO2 hydrogenation and selective conversion to light hydrocarbons over Fe/MCM-41 catalysts, J. Chem. Eng. 306, 866–875. [CrossRef]
  • Visconti C.C., Martinelli M., Falbo L., Fratalocchi L., Lietti L. (2016) CO2 hydrogenation to hydrocarbons over Co and Fe-based Fischer–Tropsch catalysts, J. Catal. Today 277, 161–170. [CrossRef]
  • Fischer N., Henkel R., Hettel B., Iglesias M., Schaub G., Claeys M. (2016) Hydrocarbons via CO2 hydrogenation over iron catalysts: the effect of potassium on structure and performance, J. Catal. Lett. 146, 509–517. [CrossRef]
  • Visconti C.G., Martinelli M., Falbo L., Molina A.I., Lietti L., Forzatti P., Iaquaniello G., Palo E., Picutti B., Brignoli F. (2016) CO2 hydrogenation to lower olefins on a high surface area K-promoted bulk Fe-catalyst, J. Appl. Catal. B 200, 530–542. [CrossRef]
  • Hu S., Liu M., Ding F., Song Ch., Zhang G., Guo X. (2016) Hydrothermally stable MOFs for CO2 hydrogenation over iron-based catalyst top light olefins, J. CO2 Util. 15, 89–95. [CrossRef]
  • Kangvansura P., Chew L.M., Saengsui W., Santawaja P., Pooarporn Y., Muhler M., Schulz H., Worayingyong A. (2016) Product distribution of CO2 hydrogenation by K- and Mn-promoted Fe catalysts supported on N-functionalized carbon nanotubes, J. Catal. Today 275, 59–65. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Zhang L.X., Zhang Y.C., Chen S.Y. (2011) Effect of promoter TiO2 on the performance of CuO–ZnO–Al2O3 catalyst for CO2 catalytic hydrogenation to methanol, J. Fuel Chem. Technol. 39, 912–917. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Huang Ch., Chen Sh., Fei X., Liu D., Zhang Y. (2015) Catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 to methanol: study of synergistic effect on adsorption properties of CO2 and H2 in CuO/ZnO/ZrO2 system, J. Catal. 5, 1846–1861. [CrossRef]
  • Liaw B.J., Chen Y.Z. (2001) Liquid-phase synthesis of methanol from CO2/H2 over ultrafine CuB catalysts, J. Appl. Catal. A 206, 245–256. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Prasad P.S.S., Bae J.W., Jun K.W., Lee K.W. (2008) Fischer–Tropsch synthesis by carbon dioxide hydrogenation on Fe-based catalysts, Catal. Surv. Asia 12, 170–183. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Deerattrakul V., Dittanet P., Sawangphruk M., Kongkachuichay P. (2016) CO2 hydrogenation to methanol using Cu–Zn catalyst supported on reduced grapheme oxide nanosheets, J. CO2 Util. 16, 104–113. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Cai W., Piscina P.R., Toyir J., Homs N. (2015) CO2 hydrogenation to methanol over CuZnGa catalysts prepared using microwave-assisted methods, J. Catal. Today 242, 193–199. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Ren H., Xu Ch.H., Zhao H.Y., Wang Y.X., Liu J., Liu J.Y. (2015) Methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation over Cu/γ-Al2O3 catalysts modified by ZnO, ZrO2 and MgO, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 261–267. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Jeong H., Cho C.H., Kim T.H. (2012) Effect of Zr and pH in the preparation of Cu/ZnO catalysts for the methanol synthesis by CO2 hydrogenation, React. Kinet. Mech. Catal. 106, 435–443. [CrossRef]
  • Liu Ch., Guo X., Guo Q., Mao D., Yu J., Lu G. (2016) Methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation over copper supported on MgO-modified TiO2, J. Mol. Catal. A 425, 86–93. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Guo X., Mao D., Lu G., Wang S., Wu G. (2010) Glycine-nitrate combustion synthesis of CuO–ZnO–ZrO2 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation, J. Catal. 271, 178–185. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Dorner R.W., Hardy D.R., Williams F.W., Willauer H.D. (2010) Effects of ceria-doping on a CO2 hydrogenation iron-manganese catalyst, J. Catal. Commun. 11, 816–819. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Ning W., Koizumi N., Yamada M. (2009) Researching Fe catalyst suitable for CO2-containing syngas for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, J. Energy Fuels 23, 4696–4700. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Ni X., Tan Y., Han Y., Tsubaki N. (2007) Synthesis of isoalkanes over Fe–Zn–Zr/HY composite catalyst through carbon dioxide hydrogenation, J. Catal. Commun. 8, 1711–1714. [CrossRef]
  • Lee S. Ch., Jang J.H., Lee B.Y., Kim J.S., Kang M., Lee S.B., Choi M.J., Choung S.J. (2004) Promotion of hydrocarbon selectivity in CO2 hydrogenation by Ru component, J. Mol. Catal. A 210, 131–141. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Riedel T., Claeys M., Schulz H., Schaub G., Nam S.S., Jun K.W., Choi M.J., Kishan G., Lee K.W. (1999) Comparative study of Fischer–Tropsch synthesis with H2/CO and H2/CO2 syngas using Fe- and Co-based catalysts, J. Appl. Catal. A 186, 201–213. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Zhao G., Zhang Ch., Qin Sh., Xiang H., Li Y. (2008) Effect of interaction between potassium and structural promoters on Fischer–Tropsch performance in iron-based catalysts, J. Mol. Catal. 286, 137–142. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Dubois J.L., Sayama K., Arakawa H. (1992) CO2 hydrogenation over carbide catalysts, J. Chem. Lett. 21, 5–8. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Toyir J., de la Piscina P.R., Fierro J.L.G., Homs N. (2001) Highly effective conversion of CO2 to methanol over supported and promoted copper-based catalysts: influence of support and promoter, J. Appl. Catal. B 29, 207–215. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Siwawut J., Namkhang P., Kongkachuichay P. (2015) Co-metal catalysts on SiO2-TiO2 for methanol production from CO2-effect of preparation methods, J. Chem. Eng. Technol. 38, 2153–2160. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Kiatphuengporn S., Chareonpanich M., Limtrakul J. (2014) Effect of unimodal and bimodal MCM-41 mesoporous silica supports on activity of Fe–Cu catalysts for CO2 hydrogenation, J. Chem. Eng. 240, 527–553. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Xiao J., Mao D., Guo X., Yu J. (2015) Effect of TiO2, ZrO2, and TiO2–ZrO2 on the performance of CuO–ZnO catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methanol, J. Appl. Surf. Sci. 338, 146–153. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Saito M. (1998) R&D activities in Japan on methanol synthesis from CO2 and H2, J. Catal. Surv. Jpn. 2, 175. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Tremblay J.F. (2008) CO2 as feedstock. Mitsui will make methanol from the greenhouse gas, J. Chem. Eng. News 86, 13. (In the text)
  • Goehna H., Koenig P. (1994) Producing methanol from CO2, J. Chem. Technol. 6, 36. (In the text)
  • Shulenberger A.M., Jonsson F.R., Ingolfsson O., Tran K.C. (2007) Process for producing liquid fuel from carbon dioxide and water, US Patent Appl. 0244208A1. (In the text)
  • Bogdan V.I., Kustov L.M. (2015) Reduction of carbon dioxide with hydrogen on a Cu–ZnO mixed catalyst under supercritical conditions, J. Mendeleev. Commun. 25, 446–448. [CrossRef] (In the text)
  • Tursunov O., Kustov L., Tilyabaev Z. (2017) Methanol synthesis from the catalytic hydrogenation of CO2 over CuO-ZnO supported on aluminum and silicon oxides, J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 78, 416–422. [CrossRef] (In the text)

All Tables

Table 1

Summary of the effect of operating parameters on H2/CO2 to methanol.

All Figures

thumbnail Figure 1

Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel combustion and cement production by 2014 (black dotes) and estimates to 2019 (red dots) [1].

In the text
thumbnail Figure 2

XRD patterns of (a) GO, (b) rGO, (c) calcined rGO, (d) 5% CuZn/rGO, (e) 10% CuZn/rGO, (f) 20% CuZn/rGO and (g) 30% CuZn/rGO [54].

In the text
thumbnail Figure 3

The relationship between CH3OH selectivity and the number of basic sites over Cu/ZnO/ZrO2 catalysts [28].

In the text
thumbnail Figure 4

The relationship between methanol yield and the exposed Cu surface area (reaction conditions: H2/CO2 = 3, T = 240 °C, P = 3.0 MPa, GHSV = 3600 h−1) [27].

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.