ogst
Home All issues Volume 70 / No 3 (May–June 2015) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 70 3 (2015) 429-436 References
IFP Energies nouvelles International Conference: NEXTLAB 2014 – Advances in Innovative Experimental Methodology or Simulation Tools used to Create, Test, Control and Analyse Systems, Materials and Molecules
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 70, Number 3, May–June 2015
IFP Energies nouvelles International Conference: NEXTLAB 2014 – Advances in Innovative Experimental Methodology or Simulation Tools used to Create, Test, Control and Analyse Systems, Materials and Molecules
Page(s) 429 - 436
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2014056
Published online 19 March 2015
  • Iglesias-Juez A., Beale A.M., O’Brien M.G., Newton M.A., Bras W., Weckhuysen B.M. (2009) Multi-Technique In situ Approach Towards the Study of Catalytic Solids at Work Using Synchrotron Radiation, Synchrotron Radiation News 22, 1, 22–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bell A.T. (2003) The Impact of Nanoscience on Heterogeneous Catalysis, Science 299, 5613, 1688–1691. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y., Somorjai G.A. (2010) Nanoscale Advances in Catalysis and Energy Applications, Nano Letters 10, 7, 2289–2295. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zäch M., Hägglund C., Chakarov D., Kasemo B.B. (2006) Nanoscience and nanotechnology for advanced energy systems, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 10, 3-4, 132–143. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hargreaves J.S.J. (2005) Powder X-ray diffraction and heterogeneous catalysis, Crystallography Reviews 11, 1, 21–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rodriguez J.A., Hanson J.C., Wen W., Wang X., Brito J.L., Martínez-Arias A., Fernández-García M. (2009) In-situ characterization of water-gas shift catalysts using time-resolved X-ray diffraction, Catalysis Today 145, 3-4, 188–194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • du Plessis H.E., Forbes R.P., Barnard W., Erasmus W.J, Steuwer A. (2013) In situ reduction study of cobalt model Fischer-Tropsch synthesis catalysts, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 11640–11645. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wragg D.S., Akporiaye D., Fjellvåg H. (2011) Direct observation of catalyst behaviour under real working conditions with X-ray diffraction: Comparing SAPO-18 and SAPO-34 methanol to olefin catalysts, Journal of Catalysis 279, 2, 397–402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newton M.A., Di Michiel M., Kubacka A, Fernández-García M. (2010) Combining Time-Resolved Hard X-ray Diffraction and Diffuse Reflectance Infrared Spectroscopy To Illuminate CO Dissociation and Transient Carbon Storage by Supported Pd Nanoparticles during CO/NO Cycling, Journal of the American Chemical Society 132, 13, 4540–4541. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hendriksen B.L.M., Ackermann M.D., van Rijn R., Stoltz D., Popa I., Balmes O., Resta A., Wermeille D., Felici R., Ferrer S., Frenken J.W.M. (2010) The role of steps in surface catalysis and reaction oscillations, Nat. Chem. 2, 9, 730–734. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Farkas A., Zalewska-Wierzbicka K., Bachmann C., Goritzka J., Langsdorf D., Balmes O., Janek J., Over H. (2013) High Pressure Carbon Monoxide Oxidation over Platinum (111), The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 117, 19, 9932–9942. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Balmes O., van Rijn R., Wermeille D., Resta A., Petit L., Isern H., Dufrane T., Felici R. (2009) The ID03 surface diffraction beamline for in-situ and real-time X-ray investigations of catalytic reactions at surfaces, Catalysis Today 145, 3-4, 220–226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacques S.D.M., Di Marco M., Beale A.M., Sochi T., O’Brien M.G., Espinosa-Alonso L., Weckhuysen B.M., Barnes P. (2011) Dynamic X-Ray Diffraction Computed Tomography Reveals Real-Time Insight into Catalyst Active Phase Evolution, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 50, 43, 10148–10152. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • O’Brien M.G., Jacques S.D.M., Di Michiel M., Barnes P., Weckhuysen B.M., Beale A.M. (2012) Active phase evolution in single Ni/Al2 O3 methanation catalyst bodies studied in real time using combined μ-XRD-CT and μ-absorption-CT, Chem. Sci. 3, 509–523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beale A.M., Gibson E.K., O’Brian M.G., Jacques S.D., Cernik R.J., Di Michiel M., Cobden P.D., Pirgon-Galin Ö., van de Water L., Watson M.J., Weckhuysen B.M. (2014) Chemical imaging of the sulfur-induced deactivation of Cu/ZnO catalyst bodies, Journal of Catalysis 314, 94–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Billinge S.J. (2008) Nanoscale structural order from the atomic pair distribution function (PDF): There’s plenty of room in the middle, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 181, 7, 1695–1700. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chupas P.J., Chapman K.W., Chen H., Grey C.P. (2009) Application of high-energy X-rays and Pair-Distribution-Function analysis to nano-scale structural studies in catalysis, Catalysis Today 145, 3-4, 213–219. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Newton M.A., Chapman K.W., Thompsett D., Chupas P.J. (2012) Chasing Changing Nanoparticles with Time-Resolved Pair Distribution Function Methods, Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, 11, 5036–5039. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Du P., Kokhan O., Chapman K.W., Chupas P.J., Tiede D.M. (2012) Elucidating the Domain Structure of the Cobalt Oxide Water Splitting Catalyst by X-ray Pair Distribution Function Analysis, Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, 27, 11096–11099. PMID: 22720737. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacques S.D.M., Di Michiel M., Kimber S.A.J., Yang X., Cernik R.J., Beale A.M., Billinge S.J.L. (2013) Pair distribution function computed tomography, Nature Communications 4, 2536. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bordiga S., Groppo E., Agostini G., van Bokhoven J.A., Lamberti C. (2013) Reactivity of Surface Species in Heterogeneous Catalysts Probed by In situ X-ray Absorption Techniques, Chemical Reviews 113, 3, 1736–1850. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Grunwaldt J.-D., Caravati M., Hannemann S., Baiker A. (2004) X-ray absorption spectroscopy under reaction conditions: suitability of different reaction cells for combined catalyst characterization, time-resolved studies, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 6, 3037–3047. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagai Y., Dohmae K., Ikeda Y., Takagi N., Tanabe T., Hara N., Guilera G., Pascarelli S., Newton M.A., Kuno O., Jiang H., Shinjoh H., Matsumoto S. (2008) In situ Redispersion of Platinum Autoexhaust Catalysts: An On-Line Approach to Increasing Catalyst Lifetimes? Angewandte Chemie 120, 48, 9443–9446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cafun J.-D., Kvashnina K.O., Casals E., Puntes V.F., Glatzel P. (2013) Absence of Ce3+ Sites in Chemically Active Colloidal Ceria Nanoparticles, ACS Nano 7, 12, 10726–10732. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Harris W.M., Lombardo J.J., Nelson G.J., Lai B., Wang S., Vila-Comamala J., Liu M., Liu M., Chiu W.K.S. (2014) Three-Dimensional Microstructural Imaging of Sulfur Poisoning-Induced Degradation in a Ni-YSZ Anode of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells, Sci. Rep. 4, 5246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jonesa K., Fengb H., Lanzirottic A., Mahajan D. (2005) Mapping metal catalysts using synchrotron computed microtomography (CMT) and micro-X-ray fluorescence (XRF), Topics in Catalysis 32, 3-4, 263–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hill A.H. (2013) A new gas system for automated in situ powder diffraction studies at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Journal of Applied Crystallography 46, 2, 570–572. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Andrieux J., Chabert C., Mauro A., Vitoux H., Gorges B., Buslaps T., Honkimäki V. (2014) A high-pressure and high-temperature gas-loading system for the study of conventional to real industrial sized samples in catalysed gas/solid and liquid/solid reactions, Journal of Applied Crystallography 47, 1, 245–255. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van Beek W., Safonova O.V., Wiker G., Emerich H. (2011) SNBL, a dedicated beamline for combined in situ X-ray diffraction, X-ray absorption and Raman scattering experiments, Phase Transitions 84, 8, 726–732. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell E.P., Boller E., Gordon E.J., Leonard G.A., Monaco S. (2011) The Industrial Research Program at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility: The Past, the Present, and Challenges for the Future, Synchrotron Radiation News 24, 6, 18–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suzuki, M. (2014) Recent Trends in Industrial Applications, Synchrotron Radiation News 27, 3, 2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ackland R.G., Garrod R.I., Richardson J.F. (1950) Summarized Proceedings of Conference on “X-Rays in Industry” - Melbourne, Australia, November, 1949, British J. Appl. Phys. 1, 9, 217–224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.