Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 75, 2020
Article Number 71
Number of page(s) 23
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2020065
Published online 19 October 2020
  • Amaya-Gómez R., López J., Pineda H., Urbano-Caguasango D., Pinilla J., Ratkovich N., Muñoz F. (2019) Probabilistic approach of a flow pattern map for horizontal, vertical, and inclined pipes, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74, 67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ansari A.M., Sylvester N.D., Sarica C., Shoham O., Brill J.P. (1994) A comprehensive mechanistic model for upward two phase flow in wellbores, SPE Prod. Facil. 5, 143–152. https://doi.org/10.2523/20630-MS. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bilicki Z., Kestin J. (1987) Transition criteria for two-phase flow patterns in vertical upward flow, Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 13, 3, 283–294. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Blowout accident of TianDong well #5 (1990) Petrochina Southwest Oil and Gas field Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Ebrahimi A., Khamehchi E. (2015) A robust model for computing pressure drop in vertical multiphase flow, J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 26, 1306–1316. [Google Scholar]
  • Elsharkawy A.M. (2004) Efficient methods for calculations of compressibility, density and viscosity of natural gases, Fluid Phase Equilibr. 218, 1, 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Feng J., Fu J., Chen P., Liu Z., Wei H. (2015) Predicting pressure behavior during dynamic kill drilling with a two-phase flow, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 22, 591–597. [Google Scholar]
  • Feng J., Fu J., Chen P., Luo J., Kou B. (2016a) Comparisons of the Driller’s method and the wait and weight method in deepwater well killing operation, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 41, 7, 2699–2706. [Google Scholar]
  • Feng J., Fu J., Luo J., Liu Z., Wei H. (2016b) An advanced Driller’s Method simulator for deepwater well control, J. Loss Prevent. Proc. 39, 131–140. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fu J., Su Y., Jiang W., Li S., Chen Y. (2019) Wellbore annulus water hammer pressure prediction based on transient multi-phase flow characteristics, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74, 84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gao Y., Cui Y., Xu B., Sun B., Zhao X., Li H., Chen L. (2017) Two phase flow heat transfer analysis at different flow patterns in the wellbore, Appl. Therm. Eng. 117, 544–552. [Google Scholar]
  • Guo R., Chen Y., Waltrich P.J., Williams W.C. (2018) An experimental investigation on flow pattern map and drift-flux model for Co-Current upward liquid-gas two-phase flow in narrow annuli, J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 51, 65–72. [Google Scholar]
  • Guo X., Wang Q. (2016) A new prediction model of elemental sulfur solubility in sour gas mixtures, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 31, 98–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Hasan A.R., Kabir C.S. (1988) A study of multiphase flow behavior in vertical wells, Spede. 3, 2, 263–272. https://doi.org/10.2118/15138-PA. [Google Scholar]
  • Hou Z., Yan T., Li Z., Feng J., Sun S., Yuan Y. (2019) Temperature prediction of two phase flow in wellbore using modified heat transfer model: An experimental analysis, Appl Therm. Eng. 149, 54–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelessidis V.C., Dukler A.E. (1989) Modeling flow pattern transitions for upward gas-liquid flow in vertical concentric and eccentric annuli, Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 15, 2, 173–191. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li H.Z., Mouline Y. (1997) Chaotic bubble coalescence in non-newtonian fluids, Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 23, 713–723. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mao L., Zhang Z. (2018) Transient temperature prediction model of horizontal wells during drilling shale gas and geothermal energy, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 169, 610–622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meng Y., Xu C., Na W., Gao L., Hongtao L., Mubai D. (2015) Numerical simulation and experiment of the annular pressure variation caused by gas kick/injection in wells, J Nat Gas Sci Eng. 22, 646–655. [Google Scholar]
  • Nickens H.V. (1987) A dynamic computer model of kick Well, SPE Drill. Eng. 2, 2, 158–173. https://doi.org/10.2118/14183-PA. [Google Scholar]
  • Osman E.S.A. (2004) Artificial neural network models for identifying flow regimes and predicting liquid holdup in horizontal multiphase flow, SPE Prod. Facil. 19, 1, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.2118/68219-MS. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rader D.W., Bourgoyne A.T., Ward R.H. (1975, May 1) Factors affecting bubble-rise velocity of gas kicks, Society of Petroleum Engineers. https://doi.org/10.2118/4647-PA. [Google Scholar]
  • Raghavan R. (1989) Well-test analysis for multiphase flow, SPE Form. Eval. 4, 4, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.2118/14098-PA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi H., Li G., Huang Z., Shi S. (2014) Properties and testing of a hydraulic pulse jet and its application in offshore drilling, Petrol. Sci. 11, 3, 401–407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun B., Gong P.B., Wang Z.Y. (2013) Simulation of gas kick with high H2S content in deep well, J. Hydrodyn. 25, 2, 264–273. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun B.J., Sun X.H., Wang Z.Y., Chen Y.H. (2017) Effects of phase transition on gas kick migration in deepwater horizontal drilling, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 46, 710–729. [Google Scholar]
  • Sun B.J., Guo Y.H., Sun W.T., Gao Y., Hao L., Wang Z., Zhang H. (2018) Multiphase flow behavior for acid-gas mixture and drilling fluid flow in vertical wellbore, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 165, 388–396. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vesovic V., Assael M.J., Gallis Z.A. (1998) Prediction of the viscosity of supercritical fluid mixtures, Int. J. Thermophys. 19, 5, 1297–1313. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang N., Sun B., Wang Z., Wang J., Yang C. (2016) Numerical simulation of two phase flow in wellbores by means of drift flux model and pressure based method, J. Nat. Gas. Sci. Eng. 36, 811–823. [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Z.Y., Sun B.J. (2014) Deepwater gas kick simulation with consideration of the gas hydrate phase transition, J. Hydrodyn. 26, 1, 94–103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Z., Sun B. (2009) Annular multiphase flow behavior during deep water drilling and the effect of hydrate phase transition, Petrol. Sci. 6, 1, 57–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wei N., Xu C.Y., Meng Y.F., Li G. (2018) Numerical simulation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in wellbore based on drift flux model, Appl. Math. Comput. 338, 175–191. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu Z.M., Song X.Z., Li G.S., Wu K., Pang Z., Zhu Z. (2018) Development of a transient non-isothermal two-phase flow model for gas kick simulation in HTHP deep well drilling, Appl. Therm. Eng. 141, 1055–1069. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu Z.M., Song X.Z., Li G.S., Zhu Z., Zhu B. (2019) Gas kick simulation in oil-based drilling fluids with the gas solubility effect during high-temperature and high-pressure well drilling, Appl. Therm. Eng. 149, 1080–1097. [Google Scholar]
  • Xie J., Zhang X., Tang Y., Wang Y., Shao Q., Yu B. (2014) Transient simulation of the blowing-out process of the air pockets in vertical wellbore, Appl. Therm. Eng. 72, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  • Yin H., Liu P., Li Q., Wang Q., Gao D. (2015) A new approach to risk control of gas kick in high-pressure sour gas wells, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
  • Yin B., Gang L., Li X. (2017) Multiphase transient flow model in wellbore annuli during gas kick in deepwater drilling based on oil-based mud, Appl. Math. Model. 51, 159–198. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang X., Li Q., Zheng L., Li X., Xu L. (2020) Numerical simulation and feasibility assessment of acid gas injection in a carbonate formation of the Tarim Basin, China. Oil Gas, Sci. Technol. 75, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J., Li X., Tang X., Luo W. (2019) Establishment and analysis of temperature field of riserless mud recovery system, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74, 19, 1–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu G., Zhang S., Huang H., Liang Y., Meng S., Li Y. (2011) Gas genetic type and origin of hydrogen sulfide in the Zhongba gas field of the western Sichuan Basin, China, Appl. Geochem. 26, 7, 1261–1273. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.