ogst
Home All issues Volume 69 / No 7 (December 2014) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 69 7 (2014) 1191-1199 References
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 69, Number 7, December 2014
Page(s) 1191 - 1199
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2014011
Published online 03 June 2014
  • Bear J. (1972) Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media, Dover Publications, Inc., New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown G.P., Dinardo A., Cheng G.K., Sherwood T.K. (1946) The Flow of Gases in Pipes at Low Pressures, Journal of Applied Physics 17, 10, 802–813. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarkson C.R., Nobakht M., Kaviani D., Ertekin T. (2012) Production Analysis of Tight Gas and Shale Gas Reservoirs Using the Dynamic-Slippage Concept, SPE Journal 17, 1, 230–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Curtis J.B. (2002) Fractured shale-gas system, AAPG Bulletin 86, 11, 1921–1938. [Google Scholar]
  • Ertekin T., King G.A., Schwerer F.C. (1986) Dynamic Gas Slippage: A Unique Dual-Mechanism Approach to the Flow of Gas in Tight Formations, SPE Formation Evaluation 1, 1, 43–52. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartman R.C., Ambrose.R.J., Akkutlu I.Y., Clarkson C.R..(2011) Shale Gas-in-Place Calculations Part II - Multicomponent Gas Adsorption Effects, North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Texas, USA, 14-16 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Javadpour F. (2009) Nanopores and Apparent Permeability of Gas Flow in Mudrocks (Shales and Siltstone), Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology 48, 8, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Kanellopoulos N.K. (1985) Capillary models for porous media: Newtonian and non-Newtonian flow, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 108, 1, 11–17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kerkhof P.J.A.M., Geboers M.A.M. (2005) Analysis and extension of the theory of multi-component fluid diffusion, Chemical Engineering Science 60, 12, 3129–3167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Letham E.A. (2011) Matrix Permeability Measurements of Gas Shales: Gas Slippage and Adsorption as Sources of Systematic Error, Bachelor Thesis, The University of British Columbia. [Google Scholar]
  • Loucks R.G., Reed R.M., Ruppel S.C., Hammes U. (2012) Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores, AAPG Bulletin 96, 6, 1071–1098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Malek K., Coppens M.O. (2003) Knudsen self- and Fickian Diffusion in Rough Nanoporous Media, Journal of Chemical Physics 119, 5, 2801–2811. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Markovic A., Stoltenberg D., Enke D., Schlnder E.U., Seidel-Morgenstern A. (2009) Gas permeation through porous glass membranes Part I. Mesoporous glasses-Effect of pore diameter and surface properties, Journal of Membrane Science 336, 1–2, 17–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Muskat M., (1946) The Flow of Homogeneous Fluids through Porous Media, Edwards J.W., Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan. [Google Scholar]
  • Ozkan E., Raghavan R., Apaydin O.G. (2010) Modeling of Fluid Transfer From Shale Matrix to Fracture Network, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19-22 Sept. [Google Scholar]
  • Scheidegger A.E. (1957) The physics of flow through porous media, University of Toronto Press, Toronto. [Google Scholar]
  • Shabro V., Torres-Verdin C., Javadpour F. (2011) Numerical Simulation of Shale-Gas Production: from Pore-Scale Modeling of Slip-Flow, Knudsen Diffusion, and Langmuir Desorption to Reservoir Modeling of Compressible Fluid, North American Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Texas, USA, 14-16 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Swami V. (2012) Shale Gas Reservoir Modeling: From Nanopores to Laboratory, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Texas, USA, 8-10 Oct. [Google Scholar]
  • Swami V., Settari A.T. (2012) A Pore Scale Gas Flow Model for Shale Gas Reservoir, SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pennsylvania, USA, 5-7 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Yao T.Y., Huang Y.Z., Li J.S. (2012) Flow Regim for Shale Gas in Extra Low Permeability Porous Media, Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 44, 6, 990–995. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.