Open Access
Numéro
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 75, 2020
Numéro d'article 74
Nombre de pages 16
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2020071
Publié en ligne 20 octobre 2020
  • Grand View Research (2019) Refinery Catalysts Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Material (Zeolites, Chemical Compounds), By Application (FCC, Hydrocracking, Catalytic Hydrotreating), By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2019–2025, 172 p. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA (2018) The Future of Petrochemicals, International Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
  • Hakeem A. (2019) High Throughput catalyst testing to enhance refinery operations, in: SPE Kuwait Oil & Gas Show and Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 8 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Wehinger G.D., Kreitz B., Nagy A.J., Turek T. (2020) Characterization of a modular Temkin reactor with experiments and computational fluid dynamics simulations, Chem. Eng. J. 389, 124342. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124342 [Google Scholar]
  • Figueiredo J.L. (1982) Progress in catalyst deactivation, Springer, Dordrecht. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mederos F.S., Ancheyta J., Chen J. (2009) Review on criteria to ensure ideal behaviors in trickle-bed reactors, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 355, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  • Sie S.T. (1996) Miniaturization of hydroprocessing catalyst testing systems: Theory and practice, AIChE J. 42, 12, 3498–3507. [Google Scholar]
  • Mears D.E. (1971) The role of axial dispersion in trickle-flow laboratory reactors, Chem. Eng. Sc. 26, 1361–1366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gierman H. (1988) Design of laboratory hydrotreating reactors: Scaling down of trickle-flow reactors, Appl. Catal. 43, 277–286. [Google Scholar]
  • Thiele E.W. (1939) Relation between catalytic activity and size of particle, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 31, 916–920. [Google Scholar]
  • Mears D.E. (1971) Tests for transport limitations in experimental catalytic reactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 10, 4, 541–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rolland M., Fonte C. (2015) Incertitude induced by testing a small number of catalytic pellets in fixed beds, Chem. Eng. Sci. 138, 698–705. [Google Scholar]
  • Raynal L., Augier F., Bazer-Bachi F., Haroun Y., Pereira da Fonte C. (2016) CFD applied to process development in the oil and gas industry – a review, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 71, 42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dixon A.G., Nijemeisland M. (2001) CFD as a design tool for fixed-bed reactors, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 40, 23, 5246–5254. [Google Scholar]
  • Dorai F., Teixeira C.M., Rolland M., Climent E., Marcoux M., Wachs A. (2015) Fully resolved simulations of the flow through a packed bed of cylinders: Effect of size distribution, Chem. Eng. Sci. 129, 180–192. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger R.J., Perez-Ramirez J., Kapteijn F., Moulijn J.A. (2002) Catalyst performance testing. Radial and axial dispersion related to dilution in fixed-bed laboratory reactors, Appl. Catal. A Gen. 227, 321–333. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger R.J., Perez-Ramirez J., Kapteijn F., Moulijn J.A. (2002) Catalyst performance testing: the influence of catalyst bed dilution on the conversion observed, Chem. Eng. J. 90, 173–183. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger R.J., Perez-Ramirez J., Kapteijn F., Moulijn J.A. (2002) Catalyst performance testing: bed dilution revisited, Chem. Eng. Sci. 57, 4921–4932. [Google Scholar]
  • Taniewski M., Lachowicz A., Skutil K., Czechowicz D. (1996) The effect of dilution of the catalyst bed on its heat-transfer characteristics in oxidative coupling of methane, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 18, 4271–4278. [Google Scholar]
  • Rolland M. (2014) Des limites à la reduction d’échelle en réacteur de test catalytique en lit fixe ? PhD thesis, Université Claude Bernard – Lyon I, Lyon, 214 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Khadilkar M.R., Wu Y.X., Al-Dahhan M.H., Duduković M.P., Colakyan M. (1996) Comparison of trickle-bed and upflow reactor performance at high pressure: Model predictions and experimental observations, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 10, 2139–2148. [Google Scholar]
  • Goto S., Levec J., Smith J.M. (1975) Mass transfer in packed beds with two-phase flow, Ind. Eng. Chem. Process. Des. Dev. 14, 4, 473–478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saada N.Y. (1972) Assessment of interfacial area in co-current two-phase flow in packed beds, Chim. Ind. Génie chimique 105, 1415. [Google Scholar]
  • Larachi F., Belfares L., Iliuta I., Grandjean B.P.A. (2003) Heat and mass transfer in cocurrent gas-liquid packed beds. Analysis, recommendations and new correlations, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42, 222–242. [Google Scholar]
  • Belfares L., Cassanello M.C., Grandjean B.P.A., Larachi F. (2001) Liquid back-mixing in packed-bubble column reactors: a state-of-the-art correlation, Catal. Today 64, 321–332. [Google Scholar]
  • Bensetiti Z., Larachi F., Grandjean B.P.A. (1997) Liquid saturation in cocurrent upflow fixed-bed reactors: a state-of-the-art correlation, Chem. Eng. Sci. 52, 4239–4247. [Google Scholar]
  • Poling B.E., Prausnitz J.M., O’Connell J.P. (2000) The properties of Gases and Liquids, 5th edn., McGraw-Hill Professional. [Google Scholar]
  • Toppinen S., Salmi T., Rantakylae T.K., Aittamaa J. (1996) Kinetics of the Liquid-Phase Hydrogenation of Benzene and Some Monosubstituted Alkylbenzenes over a Nickel Catalyst, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 1824–1833. [Google Scholar]
  • Ranz W.E., Marshall W.R. (1952) Evaporation from Drops, Chem. Eng. Prog. 48, 141–146, 173–180. [Google Scholar]
  • Moulijn J.A., Makkee M., Berger R.J. (2016) Catalyst testing in multiphase micro-packed-bed reactors; criterion for radial mass transport, Catal. Today 259, 354–359. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.