Open Access
Numéro
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 74, 2019
Numéro d'article 32
Nombre de pages 22
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018106
Publié en ligne 25 mars 2019
  • Genter A., Evans K., Cuenot N., Fritsch D., Sanjuan B. (2010) Contribution of the exploration of deep crystalline fractured reservoir of Soultz to the knowledge of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS), C. R. Geosci. 342, 7–8, 502–516. doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2010.01.006. [Google Scholar]
  • Ungemach P., Antics M., Lalos P., Borozdina O., Foulquier L., Papachristou M. (2011) Geomodelling and well architecture, key issues to sustainable reservoir development, Proceedings, Thirty-Sixth Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, January 31–February 2, Stanford University, Stanford, California. SGP-TR-191. [Google Scholar]
  • Saleh A., El Fiki A., Rodriguez J.M., Laroche S., Castor K.Y., Marin D., Bianchi T., Bertrand P., Herrmann P. (2017) A step change in seismic imaging quality in Western Desert of Egypt – An acquisition case study, 79th EAGE Conference & Exhibition, 12–15 June 2017, Paris, France. [Google Scholar]
  • Schmelzbach C., Greenhalgh S., Reiser F., Girard J.F, Bretaudeau F., Capar L., Bitri A. (2016) Advanced seismic processing/imaging techniques and their potential for geothermal exploration, Interpretation 4, 4, SR1–SR18. doi: 10.1190/INT-2016-0017.1. www.researchgate.net. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mougenot D., Layotte P. (1996) Imagerie sismique d’un réservoir carbonaté: le Dogger du Bassin Parisien, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 51, 4, 451–496. [Google Scholar]
  • Mougenot D. (1999) Seismic imaging of a carbonate reservoir: the Dogger of the Villeperdue oil field, Paris Basin, France, Pet. Geosci. 5, 75–82. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brosse E., Badinier G., Blanchard F., Caspard E., Collin P.Y., Delmas J., Dezayes C., Dreux R., Dufournet A., Durst P., Fillacier S., Garcia D., Grataloup S., Hanot F., Hasanov V., Houel P., Kervévan C., Lansiart M., Lescanne M., Menjoz A., Monnet M., Mougin P., Nedelec B., Poutrel A., Rachez X., Renoux P., Rigollet C., Ruffier-Meray V., Saysset S., Thinon I., Thoraval A., Vidal-Gilbert S. (2010) Selection and characterization of geological sites able to host a pilot-scale CO2 storage in the Paris Basin (GéoCarbone-PICOREF), Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 65, 3, 375–403. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Delmas J., Brosse E., Houel P. (2010) Petrophysical properties of the middle Jurassic carbonates in the PICOREF sector (South Champagne, Paris Basin, France), Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 65, 3, 405–434. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Denis M., Brem V., Pradalie F., Moinet F., Retailleau M., Langlois J., Bai B., Taylor R., Chamberlain V., Frith I. (2013) Can land broadband seismic be as good as marine broadband? The Leading Edge 32, 1382–1388. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michel L., Lafet Y., Sablon R., Russier D., Hanumantha R. (2012) Variable-depth streamer – Benefits for rock property inversion, 74th Conference and Exhibition, 4–7 June, Copenhagen, Denmark, EAGE. [Google Scholar]
  • Seeni S., Zaki H., Setiyono K., Snow J., Leveque A., Guerroudj M., Sampanthan S. (2011) Ultra high-density full wide-azimuth processing using digital array forming, 73rd Conference and Exhibition, 23 May, Dukhan Field, Qatar, EAGE. Extended Abstracts, F006. [Google Scholar]
  • Stewart R., Gaiser E., Brown R., Lawton C. (2003) Converted-wave seismic exploration: Applications, Geophysics 68, 1, 40–57. doi: 10.1190/1.1543193. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chopra S., Marfurt K.J. (2005) Seismic attributes – A historical perspective, Geophysics 70, 5, 3SO–28SO. doi: 10.1190/1.2098670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chopra S., Marfurt K.J. (2007) Seismic attributes for prospect identification and reservoir characterization, Society of Exploration Geophysicists and European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers, p. 481. [Google Scholar]
  • Brown A.R. (1996) Seismic attributes and their classification, The Leading Edge, 15, 10, 1090–1090. doi: 10.1190/1.1437208. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coleou T., Allo F., Colnard O., Machecler I., Dillon L., Schwedersky G., Nunes C., De Abreu E., Colpaert A., van Wijngaarden A.J. (2012) Petrophysical seismic inversion over an offshore carbonate field, 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2012, 4–7 June 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  • Bouchot V., Bader A.G., Bialkowski A., Bonte D., Bourgine B., Caritg S., Castillo C., Dezayes C., Gabalda S., Guillou-Frottier L., Haffen S., Hamm V., Kervevan C., Lopez S., Peter-Borie M. (2012) CLASTIQ-2 – Programme de recherche sur les ressources géothermales des réservoirs clastiques en France (Bassin de Paris et fossé Rhénan). Rapport final BRGM/RP-61472-FR. [Google Scholar]
  • Ortiz-Karpf A. (2016) Bathymetric and substrate controls on submarine mass-transport emplacement processes and channel-levee complex evolution, PhD Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, p. 237. [Google Scholar]
  • Scholten-Vissinga M. (2014) QI workflow to identify sweet spots in the tight Amin Gas Play in North Oman, Second EAGE Workshop on Rock Physics – Rock Physics: Integration & Beyond, 12–14 January 2014, Muscat, Oman. [Google Scholar]
  • Baptiste J. (2016) Cartographie structurale et lithologique du substratum du Bassin parisien et sa place dans la chaîne varisque de l’Europe de l’Ouest - Approches combinées: géophysiques, pétrophysiques, géochronologiques et modélisations 2D, Thèse de Doctorat, Univ. d’Orléans, p. 374. [Google Scholar]
  • Oliver G., Spence G., Davis A., Stolyarov S., Gadzhimirzaev D., Ackley B., Lipp C. (2016) Advanced cuttings analysis provides improved completion design, efficiency and well production, First Break 34, 69–76. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.