ogst
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 71 / Numéro 3 (May–June 2016) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 71 3 (2016) 32 Références
Open Access
Numéro
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 71, Numéro 3, May–June 2016
Numéro d'article 32
Nombre de pages 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2015014
Publié en ligne 20 août 2015
  • Somerton W.H., Söylemezoglu I.M., Dudley R.C. (1975) Effect of stress on permeability of coal, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts 12, 5-6, 129–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Durucan S., Edwards J.S. (1986) The Effect of stress and fracturing on permeability of coal, Mining Science and Technology 3, 205–216. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McKee C.R., Bumb A.C., Koenig R.A. (1987) Stress-dependent permeability and porosity of coal, Proceedings of the 1987 Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, pp. 183–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Seidle J.P., Jeansonne M.W., Erickson D.J. (1992) Application of matchstick geometry to stress dependent permeability in coals, Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Casper, Wyoming, 18-21 May, SPE 24361. [Google Scholar]
  • Connell L.D., Lu M., Pan Z. (2010) An analytical coal permeability model for tri-axial strain and stress conditions, International Journal of Coal Geology 84, 2, 103–114. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Connell L.D., Pan Z., Lu M., Heryanto D., Camilleri M. (2010) Coal permeability and its behavior with gas desorption, pressure and stress, SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Brisbane, Australia, 18-20 Oct., SPE Paper 133915. [Google Scholar]
  • Jasinge D., Ranjith P.G., Choi S.K. (2010) Effects of effective stress changes on permeability of latrobe valley brown coal, Fuel 90, 1292–1300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harpalani S., Zhao X. (1989) An investigation of the effect of gas desorption on coal permeability formation, Proceedings of the 1989 Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, pp. 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Harpalani S., Schraufnagel R.A. (1990) Shrinkage of coal matrix with release of gas and its impact on permeability of coal, Fuel 69, 551–556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Harpalani S., Chen G.L. (1997) Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 15, 4, 303–325. [Google Scholar]
  • Bodden W.P., Ehrlich R. (1998) Permeability of coals and characteristics of desorption tests: Implications for coalbed methane production, International Journal of Coal Geology 35, 333–347. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chikatamarla L., Cui X., Bustin R.M. (2004) Implications of volumetric swelling/shrinkage of coal in sequestration of acid gases, Proceedings of the 2004 Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama. [Google Scholar]
  • Levine J.R. (1996) Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs, in Coalbed Methane and Coal Geology, Gayer R., Harris I. (eds), Geological Society Special Publication, 109, London, pp. 197–212. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Robertson E.P., Christiansen R.L. (2006) A permeability model for coal and other fractured, sorptive-elastic media, SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Canton, Ohio, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Z., Connell L.D. (2007) A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling, International Journal of Coal Geology 69, 243–252. [Google Scholar]
  • Viete D.R., Ranjith P.G. (2007) The mechanical behavior of coal with respect to CO2 sequestration in deep coal seams, Fuel 86, 2667–2671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lin W., Tang G.-Q., Kovscek A.R. (2008) Sorption-induced permeability change of coal during gas-injection processes, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 11. [Google Scholar]
  • Balan H.O., Gumrah F. (2009) Assessment of shrinkage–swelling influences in coal seams using rank-dependent physical coal properties, International Journal of Coal Geology 77, 203–213. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarkson C.R., Pan Z., Palmer I.D., Harpalani S. (2010) Predicting sorption-induced strain and permeability increase with depletion for coalbed-methane reservoirs, SPE Journal 15, 1, 152–159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhu W.C., Liu J., Sheng J.C., Elsworth D. (2007) Analysis of coupled gas flow and deformation process with desorption and Klinkenberg effects in coal seams, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 44, 971–980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gray I. (1987) Reservoir engineering in coal seams, part 1—the physical process of gas storage and movement in coal seams, SPE Reservoir Engineering 2, 1, 28–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sawyer W.K., Zuber M.D., Kuuskraa V.A. (1987) Using reservoir simulation and field data to define mechanisms controlling coalbed methane production, Proceedings of the 1987 Coalbed Methane Symposium, Alabama, 295–307. [Google Scholar]
  • Seidle J.R., Huitt L.G. (1995) Experimental measurement of coal matrix shrinkage due to gas desorption and implications for cleat permeability increases, International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering, Beijing, China. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer I., Mansoori J. (1996) How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds, a new model, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado. [Google Scholar]
  • Palmer I., Mansoori J. (1998) Permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds, a new model, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 1, 6, 539–544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi J.Q., Durucan S. (2004) Drawdown induced changes in permeability of coalbeds: a new interpretation of the reservoir response to primary recovery, Transport in Porous Media 56, 1–16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shi J.Q., Durucan S. (2004) A numerical simulation study of the Allison Unit CO2 – ECBM pilot: the effect of matrix shrinkage and swelling on ECBM production and CO2 injectivity, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Sept. 5-9, Vancouver, Canada 1, 431–442. [Google Scholar]
  • Shi J.Q., Durucan S. (2005) A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane recovery, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 8, 4, 291–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao Y., Hu Y., Wei J., Yang D. (2003) The experimental approach to effective stress law of coal mass by effect of methane, Transport in Porous Media 53, 3, 235–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cui X., Bustin R.M. (2005) Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams, AAPG Bulletin 89, 9, 1181–1202. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cui X., Bustin R.M., Chikatamarla L. (2007) Adsorption-induced coal swelling and stress, implications for methane production and acid gas sequestration into coal seams, Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth 112, B10202. [Google Scholar]
  • Gu F., Chalaturnyk R.J. (2006) Numerical simulation of stress and strain due to gas sorption/desorption and their effects on in situ permeability of coalbeds, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 45, 10, 52–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Gu F., Chalaturnyk R.J. (2010) Permeability and porosity models considering anisotropy and discontinuity of coalbeds and application in coupled simulation, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 74, 3-4, 113–131. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Connell L.D. (2009) Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during gas production from coal seams, International Journal of Coal Geology 79, 1-2, 18–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Connell L.D., Detournay C. (2009) Coupled flow and geomechanical processes during enhanced coal seam methane recovery through CO2 sequestration, International Journal of Coal Geology 77, 1-2, 222–233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang G.X., Massarotto P., Rudolph V. (2009) An improved permeability model of coal for coalbed methane recovery and CO2 geosequestration, International Journal of Coal Geology 77, 1-2, 127–136. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu H.H., Rutqvist J. (2010) A new coal-permeability model, internal swelling stress and fracture-matrix interaction, Transport in Porous Media 82, 1, 157–171. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu J., Chen Z., Elsworth D., Miao X.X., Mao X.B. (2010) Linking gas-sorption induced changes in coal permeability to directional strains through a modulus reduction ratio, International Journal of Coal Geology 83, 1, 21–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu S., Harpalani S., Mallikarjun P. (2012) Laboratory measurement and modeling of coal permeability with continued methane production: Part 2 – Modeling results, Fuel 94, 117–124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu Y., Liu J., Elsworth D., Miao X.X., Mao X.B. (2010) Development of anisotropic permeability during coalbed methane production, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 2, 4, 197–210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wei Z., Zhang D. (2010) Coupled fluid-flow and geomechanics for triple-porosity/dual- permeability modeling of coalbed methane recovery, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 47, 8, 1242–1253. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Izadi G., Wang S., Elsworth D., Liu J., Wu Y., Pone D. (2011) Permeability evolution of fluid-infiltrated coal containing discrete fractures, International Journal of Coal Geology 85, 202–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma Q., Harpalani S., Liu S. (2011) A simplified permeability model for coalbed methane reservoirs based on matchstick strain and constant volume theory, International Journal of Coal Geology 85, 1, 43–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Z., Connell L.D. (2011) Modelling of anisotropic coal swelling and its impact on permeability behaviour for primary and enhanced coalbed methane recovery, International Journal of Coal Geology 85, 257–267. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rice D.D. (1993) Composition and origins of coalbed gas, AAPG 38, 159–184. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott A.R. (1993) Composition and origin of coalbed gases from selected basins in the United States, Proceedings of the 1993 Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, pp. 207–222. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott A.R., Kaiser W.R., Ayers W.B. Jr (1994) Thermogenic and secondary biogenic gases, San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico—implications for coalbed gas producibility, AAPG Bulletin 78, 1186–1209. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott A.R. (2002) Hydrogeologic factors affecting gas content distribution in coal beds, International Journal of Coal Geology 50, 363–387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Diamond W.P., Schatzel S.J. (1998) Measuring the gas content of coal: a review, International Journal of Coal Geology 35, 311–331. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stricker G.D., Flores R.M. (2002) Coalbed methane content in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming: saturation by coal rank and depth, 2002 International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Sept. 23-27. [Google Scholar]
  • Lamarre R. (2006) Under-saturation in coals: How does it happen and why is it important: Search and Discovery Article 40195, Available at: http://www.searchanddiscovery.net/documents/2006/06034/amarre/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Bustin A.M.M., Bustin R.M. (2008) Coal reservoir saturation: impact of temperature and pressure, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin 92, 77–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gentzis T., Goodarzi F., Cheung F.K., Laggoun-Défargec F. (2008) Coalbed methane producibility from the Mannville coals in Alberta, Canada: A comparison of two areas, International Journal of Coal Geology 74, 237–249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mares T.E., Moore T.A., Moore C.R. (2009) Uncertainty of gas saturation estimates in a subbituminous coal seam, International Journal of Coal Geology 77, 320–327. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yao Y.B., Liu D.M., Tang D.Z., Huang W.H. (2009) Preliminary evaluation of the coalbed methane production potential and its geological controls in the Weibei Coalfield, Southeastern Ordos Basin, China, International Journal of Coal Geology 78, 1, 1–15. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yao Y.B., Liu D.M., Qiu Y.K. (2013) Variable gas content, saturation, and accumulation characteristics of Weibei coalbed methane pilot-production field in the southeastern Ordos Basin, China, AAPG Bulletin 97, 8, 1371–1393. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pashin J.C. (2010) Variable gas saturation in coalbed methane reservoirs of the Black Warrior Basin: Implications for exploration and production, International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 135–146. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wong S., Macdonald D., Andrei S., Guntera W.D., Denga X., Lawc D., Yed J., Fengd S., Fand Z., Hoe P. (2010) Conceptual economics of full scale enhanced coalbed methane production and CO2 storage in anthracitic coals at South Qinshui basin, Shanxi, China, International Journal of Coal Geology 82, 280–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ayers W.B. (2002) Coalbed gas systems, resources, and production and a review of contrasting cases from the San Juan and Powder River Basins, AAPG Bulletin 86, 1853–1890. [Google Scholar]
  • Hamelinck C., Faaij A., Turkenburg W., van Bergen F., Pagnier H.J.M., Barzandji O.H.M., Wolf K.-H.A.A., Ruijg G.J. (2002) CO2 enhanced coalbed methane production in the Netherlands, Energy 27, 7, 647–674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Langmuir I. (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum, Journal of the American Chemical Society 40, 1361. [Google Scholar]
  • Dubinin M.M., Astakhov V.A. (1971) Description of adsorption equilibria of vapors on zeolites over wide ranges of temperature and pressure, Advances in Chemistry 102, 69–85, American Chemical Society Publications, Washington, DC. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DeGance A.E. (1992) Multicomponent high-pressure adsorption equilibria on carbon substrates: theory and data, Fluid Phase Equilibria 78, 99–137. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhou C., Hall F., Gasem K.A.M., Robinson R.L. Jr. (1994) Predicting gas adsorption using two-dimensional equations of state, I&EC Research 33, 1280–1289. [Google Scholar]
  • Clarkson C.R., Bustin R.M. (2000) Binary gas adsorption/desorption isotherms: Effect of moisture and coal composition upon carbon dioxide selectivity over methane, International Journal of Coal Geology 42, 241–271. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fitzgerald J.E., Pan Z., Sudibandriyo M., Robinson R.L. Jr, Gasem K.A.M. (2005) Adsorption of methane, nitrogen, carbon dioxide and their mixtures on wet Tiffany coal, Fuel 84, 2351–2363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Z.J., Connell L.D. (2009) Comparison of adsorption models in reservoir simulation of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and CO2 sequestration in coal, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 77–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gas Research Institute (GRI) (2002) A Guide to Coalbed Methane Reservoir Engineering, Report GRI-94/ 0397. [Google Scholar]
  • Mavor M.J., Gunter W.D. (2004) Secondary porosity and permeability of coal: gas composition and pressure, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, Texas, USA, 26-29 Sept. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones S.C. (1972) A rapid accurate unsteady-state klinkenberg permeameter, SPE Formation Evaluation 12, 5, 383–397. [Google Scholar]
  • Zahner B. (1997) Application of material balance to determine ultimate recovery of a San Juan Fruitland coal wel, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 5-8 Oct., San Antonio, Texas, SPE 38858. [Google Scholar]
  • Mavor M.J., Vaughn J.E. (1998) Increasing coal absolute permeability in the San Juan basin Fruitland formation, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 1, 3, 201–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanikawa W., Shimamoto T. (2006) Klinkenberg effect for gas permeability and its comparison to water permeability for porous sedimentary rocks, Hydrology & Earth System Sciences Discussions 3, 4, 1315–1338. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Klinkenberg L.J. (1941) The permeability of porous media to liquids and gases, Drilling and production Practice, American Petroleum Inst., pp. 200–213. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.