Dossier: Design of Sustainable Processes
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 65, Number 5, September-October 2010
Dossier: Design of Sustainable Processes
Page(s) 689 - 701
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2009079
Published online 28 September 2010
  • Gierman H. (1988) Design of Laboratory Hydrotreating Reactors: Scaling Down of Trickle-flow Reactors, Appl. Catal. 43, 277-286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mears D.E. (1971) The role of axial dispersion in trickle flow laboratory reactors, Chem. Eng. Sci. 26, 1361-1366. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Giese M., Rottschafer K.Vortmeyze D. (1998) Measured and modelled superficial flow profiles in packed beds with liquid flow, AIChE J. 44, 484-490. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berger R.J., Perez-Ramirez J., Kapteijn F.Moulijn J.A. (2002) Catalyst Performance Testing: the Influence of Catalyst Bed Dilution on the Conversion Observed, Chem. Eng. Sci. 90, 173-183. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sie S.T. (1996) Advantages, Possibilities, and Limitations of Small scale testing of catalysts for fixed bed processes, Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole 46, 4, 501-515. [Google Scholar]
  • Herskowitz M., Carbonell R.G.Smith J.M. (1979) Effectiveness Factors and Mass Transfer in Trickle-Bed Reactors, AIChE J. 25, 2, 272-283. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Khadilkar M.R., Wu Y., Al-Dahhan M.H., Dudukovic M.P.Colakyan M. (1996) Comparison of Trickle-Bed and Upflow Reactor Performance at High Pressure: Model Predictions and Experimental Observations, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 10, 2139-2148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Meille V., Pestre N., Fongarland P.de Bellefon C. (2004) Gas/Liquid Mass Transfer in Small Laboratory Batch Reactors: Comparison of Methods, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 43, 924-927. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guo J., Shah D.B.Talu O. (2007) Determination of Effective Diffusivities in Commercial Single Pellets: Effect of Water Loading, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 2, 600-607. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li T., Xu M., Zhu B., Fang D. (2002) Intraparticle diffusion efficiency factor of irregular A301 ammonia synthesis catalyst, J. Chem. Ind. Eng. 53, 12, 1260-1264. [Google Scholar]
  • Scott D.S., Lee W.Papa J. (1974) The measurement of transport coefficients in gas-solid heterogeneous reactions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 29, 11, 2155-2167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma R.K., Cresswell D.L.Newson E.J. (1991) Effective diffusion coefficients and tortuosity factors for commercial catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 30, 7, 1428-1433. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tottrup P.B. (1982) Evaluation of Intrinsic Steam Reforming Kinetic Parameters from Rate Measurements on Full Particle Size, Appl. Catal. 4, 377-389. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li J., Pan Y., Chen M.Zhu B. (1995) Reaction Kinetics for Olefin Hydrogenation over Cobalt-molybdenum Hydrotreating Catalyst and Model Study of Catalyst Properties, Fuel Sci. Technol. Int. 13, 7, 857-879. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee M., Shen S., Chung T.Kuei C. (1984) Flow and Dispersive Behaviors of Cylindrical Pellet String Reactor, AIChE J. 30, 4, 639-641. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kallinikos L.E.Papayannakos N.G. (2007) Operation of a Miniscale String Bed Reactor in Spiral Form at Hydrotreatment Conditions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 5531-5535. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kallinikos L.E.Papayannakos N.G. (2007) Fluid Dynamic Characteristics of a Structured Bed Spiral Mini-Reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 5979-5988. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hipolito A., Rolland M., Boyer C., de Bellefon C. (2009) Single pellet string reactor two-phase flow hydrodynamics: results on a square-channel with spherical particles, GPE-EPIC, Venice (Italy), 2009. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.