ogst
Home All issues Volume 76 (2021) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 76 (2021) 20 References
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 76, 2021
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 12
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2020099
Published online 10 March 2021
  • Barenblatt G.I., Zheltov I.P., Kochina I.N. (1960) Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks [strata], J. Appl. Math. Mech. 24, 5, 1286–1303. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chang M.M. (1993) Deriving the shape factor of a fractured rock matrix (No. NIPER-696), National Institute for Petroleum and Energy Research, Bartlesville, OK, USA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cheng Y. (2012) Impact of water dynamics in fractures on the performance of hydraulically fractured wells in gas-shale reservoirs, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 51, 2, 143–151. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cipolla C.L., Lolon E.P., Erdle J.C., Rubin B. (2010) Reservoir modeling in shale-gas reservoirs, SPE Reserv. Eva. Eng. 13, 4, 638–653. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cipolla C.L., Lolon E.P., Erdle J.C., Tathed V. (2009) Modeling well performance in shale-gas reservoirs, in: SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization & Simulation Conference, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, pp. cp-170. [Google Scholar]
  • Coats K.H. (1989) Implicit compositional simulation of single-porosity and dual-porosity reservoirs, in: SPE Symposium on Reservoir Simulation, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Delorme M., Bossie-Codreanu D., Ben-Gharbia I., Khebzegga O., Khebzegga N., Ricois O.M. (2016) Unconventional production forecast needs integration of field hydraulic stimulation data through fracture model calibration and optimized numerical scheme, in: SPE Argentina Exploration and Production of Unconventional Resources Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Ding D.Y., Wu Y.S., Farah N., Wang C., Bourbiaux B. (2014) Numerical simulation of low permeability unconventional gas reservoirs, in: SPE/EAGE European Unconventional Resources Conference and Exhibition, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Vol. 2014, No. 1cp-399. [Google Scholar]
  • Farah N. (2016) Flow modelling in low permeability unconventional reservoirs, Doctoral dissertation, Paris 6. [Google Scholar]
  • Farah N., Delorme M. (2020) Unified fracture network model (UFNM) for unconventional reservoirs simulation, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 195, 107874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107874. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Farah N., Delorme M., Ding D.Y., Wu Y.S., Bossie Codreanu D. (2018) Flow modeling of unconventional shale reservoirs using a DFM-MINC proximity function, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.014. [Google Scholar]
  • Farah N., Ding D.Y., Wu Y.S. (2015) Simulation of the impact of fracturing fluid induced formation damage in shale gas reservoirs, in: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Freeman C., Moridis G.J., Ilk D., Blasingame T. (2010) A numerical study of transport and storage effects for tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems, in: International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Hajibeygi H., Karvounis D., Jenny P. (2011) A hierarchical fracture model for the iterative multiscale finite volume method, J. Comput. Phys. 230, 24, 8729–8743. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang J., Shao Y., Younis R.M. (2014) Development of a multi-continuum multi-component model for enhanced gas recovery and CO2 storage in fractured shale gas reservoirs, in: SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, Society of Petroleum Engineers. Ji, L., Settari, A. [Google Scholar]
  • Karimi-Fard M., Gong B., Durlofsky L.J. (2006) Generation of coarse-scale continuum flow models from detailed fracture characterizations, Water Res. Res. 42, 10. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kazemi H. (1969) Pressure transient analysis of naturally fractured reservoirs with uniform fracture distribution, SPE J. 9, 4, 451–462. [Google Scholar]
  • Kazemi H., Merrill L.S. Jr, Porterfield K.L., Zeman P.R. (1976) Numerical simulation of water-oil flow in naturally fractured reservoirs, SPE J. 16, 6, 317–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Khvoenkova N., Delorme M. (2011) An optimal method to model transient flows in 3D discrete fracture network, in: IAMG Conference, Vol. 2011, pp. 1238–1249. [Google Scholar]
  • Li J., Du C., Zhang X. (2011) Critical evaluations of shale gas reservoir simulation approaches: single porosity and dual porosity modeling, in: SPE Middle East Unconventional Gas Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Li X., Zhang D., Li S. (2015) A multi-continuum multiple flow mechanism simulator for unconventional oil and gas recovery, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26, 652–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.07.005. [Google Scholar]
  • Lim K.T., Aziz K. (1995) Matrix-fracture transfer shape factors for dual-porosity simulators, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 13, 3–4, 169–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moridis G.J., Blasingame T.A., Freeman C.M. (2010) Analysis of mechanisms of flow in fractured tight-gas and shale-gas reservoirs, in: SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Noetinger B. (2015) A quasi steady state method for solving transient Darcy flow in complex 3D fractured networks accounting for matrix to fracture flow, J. Comput. Phys. 283, 205–223. [Google Scholar]
  • Pruess K., Karasaki K. (1982) Proximity functions for modeling fluid and heat flow in reservoirs with stochastic fracture distributions. [Google Scholar]
  • Pruess K., Narasimhan T.N. (1982) A practical method for modeling fluid and heat flow in fractured porous media. [Google Scholar]
  • Raterman K.T., Liu Y., Warren L. (2019) Analysis of a drained rock volume: an eagle ford example, in: Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTeC), Denver, Colorado, 22–24 July 2019, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp. 4106–4125. [Google Scholar]
  • Quintard M., Whitaker S. (1996) Transport in chemically and mechanically heterogeneous porous media. I: Theoretical development of region-averaged equations for slightly compressible single-phase flow, Adv. Water Res. 19, 1, 29–47. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Ricois O.M., Gratien J., BossieCodreanu D., Khvoenkova N., Delorme M. (2016) Advantages of an unstructured unconventional fractured media model integrated within a multiphysics computational platform, International Petroleum Technology Conference. [Google Scholar]
  • Rubin B. (2010) Accurate simulation of non-Darcy flow in stimulated fractured shale reservoirs, in SPE Western Regional Meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Tatomir A.B., Szymkiewicz A., Class H., Helmig R. (2011) Modeling two phase flow in large scale fractured porous media with an extended multiple interacting continua method, Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 77, 2, 81. [Google Scholar]
  • Van Heel A.P., Boerrigter P.M. (2006) On the shape-factor in fractured reservoir simulation, in: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Warren J.E., Root P.J. (1963) The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs, SPE J. 3, 3, 245–255. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu Y.S., Pruess K. (1988) A multiple-porosity method for simulation of naturally fractured petroleum reservoirs, SPE Reserv. Eng. 3, 1, 327–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wu Y.S., Wang C., Li J., Fakcharoenphol P. (2012) Transient gas flow in unconventional gas reservoir, in: SPE Europec/EAGE Annual Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers. [Google Scholar]
  • Wu Y.S., Liu H.H., Bodvarsson G.S. (2004) A triple-continuum approach for modeling flow and transport processes in fractured rock, J. Contam. Hydrol. 73, 1–4, 145–179. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.