ogst
Home All issues Volume 74 (2019) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 74 (2019) 20 References
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 74, 2019
Article Number 20
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018103
Published online 05 March 2019
  • Chander A., Kundu A., Bej S.K., Dalai A.K., Vohra D.K. (2001) Hydrodynamic characteristics of co-current up flow and down flow of gas and liquid in affixed bed reactor, Fuel 80, 1043–1053. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Essadki A.H., Gourich B., Vial C.H., Delmas H. (2011) Residence time distribution measurements in an external-loop airlift reactor: Study of the hydrodynamics of the liquid circulation induced by the hydrogen bubbles, Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 14, 3125–3132. [Google Scholar]
  • Fogler H.S. (1999) Elements of chemical reaction engineering, 3rd edn., Prentice-Hall, New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  • Froment G.F., Bischoff K.B., Juray D.W. (2010) Chemical reactor analysis and design, 3rd edn., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim S.D., Kim C.H. (1983) Axial dispersion characteristics of three phase fluidized beds, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 16, 172–178. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kressmann S., Boyer C., Colyar J.J., Schweitzer J.M., Viguiѐ J.C. (2000) Improvements of Ebullated-Bed Technology for upgrading heavy oils, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 55, 397–406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Levenspiel O. (1999) Chemical reaction engineering, 3rd edn., John Wiley & Sons Inc., New Jersey. [Google Scholar]
  • Parisien V., Pjontek D., McKnight C.A., Wiens J., Macchi A. (2017) Impact of catalyst density distribution on the fluid dynamics of an ebullated bed operating at high gas holdup conditions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 170, 491–500. [Google Scholar]
  • Persson J., Somes N.L.G., Wong T.H.F. (1999) Hydraulics efficiency of wetlands and ponds, Water Sci. Technol. 40, 291–300. [Google Scholar]
  • Pjontek D. (2014) Fluid dynamic studies in support of an industrial ebullated bed hydroprocessor, PhD Thesis, The University of Ottawa, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • Pjontek D., Macchi A. (2014) Hydrodynamic comparison of spherical and cylindrical particles in a gas–liquid–solid fluidized bed at elevated pressure and high gas holdup conditions, Powder Technol. 253, 657–676. [Google Scholar]
  • Safoniuk M. (1999) Dimensional Similitude and the hydrodynamics of three-phase fluidized beds, PhD thesis in Chemical and Bio-Resource Engineering, The University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez O., Michaud S., Escudié R., Delgenès J.P., Bernet N. (2005) Liquid mixing and gas–liquid mass transfer in a three-phase inverse turbulent bed reactor, Chem. Eng. J. 114, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Sarathai Y., Koottatep T., Morel A. (2010) Hydraulic characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor as onsite wastewater treatment system, J. Environ. Sci. China 22, 1319–1326. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saroha A.K., Khera R. (2006) Hydrodynamic study of fixed beds with cocurrent upflow and downflow, Chem. Eng. Proc. 45, 455–460. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schweitzer J.M., Kressmann S. (2004) Ebullated bed reactor modeling for residue conversion, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 5637–5645. [Google Scholar]
  • Shah M., Kiss A.A., Zondervan E., van der Schaaf J., de Haan A.B. (2012) Gas holdup, axial dispersion, and mass transfer studies in bubble columns, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 14268–14278. [Google Scholar]
  • Shin I.S., Son S.M., Kang Y., Kang S.H., Kim S.D. (2007) Phase holdup characteristics of viscous three-phase inverse fluidized beds, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 13, 971–978. [Google Scholar]
  • Silva E.L. (2001) Hydrodynamics characteristics and gas-liquid mass transfer in a three phase fluidized bed reactor, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. 23, 503–512. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sivalingam A., Kannadasan T. (2009) Effect of fluid flow rates on hydrodynamic characteristics of co-current three-phase fluidized beds with spherical glass bead particles, Int. J. ChemTech Res. 1, 851–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Terashima M., Goel R., Komatsu K., Yasui H., Takahashi H., Li Y.Y., Noike T. (2009) CFD simulation of mixing in anaerobic digesters, Bioresour. Technol. 100, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar]
  • Thackston E.L., Shields F.D., Schroeder P.R. (1987) Residence time distribution of shallow basins, J. Environ. Eng. 113, 1319–1332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsai D.D.W., Ramaraj R., Chen P.H. (2012) A method of short-circuiting comparison, Water Resour. Manag. 26, 2689–2702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van Gelder K.B., Westerterp K.R. (1990) Residence time distribution and hold-up in a co-current up-flow packed bed reactor at elevated pressure, Chem. Eng. Technol. 13, 27–40. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.