ogst
Home All issues Volume 73 (2018) Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 73 (2018) 69 References
Open Access
Issue
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 73, 2018
Article Number 69
Number of page(s) 10
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018072
Published online 05 December 2018
  • Liu X., Liu C., Yang Y. (2017) Dynamic behavior of the polished rod for the coalbed methane pumping installations, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 72, 16. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Falcimaigne J., Brac J., Charron Y., Pagnier P., Vilagines R. (2002) Multiphase pumping: achievements and perspectives, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 57, 1, 99–107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Omrani A., Franchek M., Ebrahimi B., Mutlu M., Grigoriadis K. (2017) Low-dimensional modeling of a pumping unit to cope with multiphase, J. Dyn. Syst. Mea. Control. 139, 4, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • Pirouzpanah S., Gudigopuram S., Morrison G. (2016) Two-phase flow characterization in a split vane impeller Electrical Submersible Pump, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 148, 82–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Minemura K., Murakami M. (1980) A theoretical study on air bubble motion in a centrifugal pump impeller, J. Fluid. Eng. - ASME 102, 446–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Minemura K., Murakami M. (1993) Three-dimensional calculation of air-water twophase flow in centrifugal pump impeller based on a bubbly flow model, J. Fluid. Eng. - ASME 115, 766–771. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Minemura K., Murakami M. (1974) Effects of entrained air on the performance of a centrifugal pump, Bull. Japan Soc. Mech. Eng. 112, 1286–1295. [Google Scholar]
  • Caridad J., Asuaje M., Kenyery F., Tremante A., Aguillon O. (2008) Characterization of a centrifugal pump impeller under two-phase flow conditions, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 63, 18–22. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J.S., Tan L. (2018) Energy performance and pressure fluctuation of a multiphase pump with different gas volume fractions, Energies 11, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Tremante A., Moreno N., Rey R. (2002) Numerical turbulent simulation of the two-phase flow (liquid/gas) through a cascade of an axial pump, J. Fluid. Eng. - ASME 124, 371–376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ishii M., Zuber N. (1979) Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows, AIChE J. 25, 843–855. [Google Scholar]
  • Ion I., Mostafa F., Faïcal L. (2003) Hydrodynamic model for horizontal two-phase flow through porous media, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 81, 957–962. [Google Scholar]
  • Laurien E., Niemann J. (2004) Determination of the virtual mass coefficient for dense bubbly flows by direct numerical simulation, 5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, Yokohama, Japan, June. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu Z.Y., Zhu B.S., Cao S.L. (2015) Interphase force analysis for air-water bubbly flow in a multiphase rotodynamic pump, Eng. Comput. 32, 2166–2180. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang W.W., Yu Z.Y., Zahid M.N., Li Y.J. (2018) Study of the gas distribution in a multiphase rotodynamic pump based on interphase force analysis, Energies 11, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee D., Best F.R., McGraw N. (1987) Microgravity two-phase flow regime modeling, Proceedings of the Nuclear Society Winter Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, USA, November. [Google Scholar]
  • Benhmidene A., Chaouachi B., Bourouis M., Gabsi S. (2011) Numerical prediction of flow patterns in bubble pumps, J. Fluid. Eng. - ASME 133, 1–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Situ R., Hibiki T., Brown R.J. (2011) Flow regime transition criteria for two-phase flow at reduced gravity conditions, Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 37, 1165–1177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang W.W., Yu Z.Y., Zhu B.S. (2017) Numerical study of pressure fluctuation in a gas-liquid two-phase mixed-flow pump, Energies 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Tan L., Zhu B.S., Cao S.L., Wang Y.C., Wang B.B. (2013) Numerical simulation of unsteady cavitation flow in a centrifugal pump at off-design conditions, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 228, 1994–2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Tan L., Zhu B.S., Cao S.L., Wang Y.M. (2013) Cavitation flow simulation for a centrifugal pump at a low flow rate, Chin. Sci. Bull. 58, 949–952. [Google Scholar]
  • Such J.W., Kim J.W., Choi Y.S., Kim J.H., Joo W.G., Lee K.Y. (2017) Multi-objective optimization of the hydrodynamic performance of the second stage of a multi-phase pump, Energies 10, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang W.W., Yu Z.Y., Zahid M.N., Li Y.J. (2018) Study of the gas distribution in a multiphase rotodynamic pump based on interphase force analysis, Energies 11, 5, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu D.Y. (1993) Fluid Dynamics of two-phase systems, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, pp. 26–31. [Google Scholar]
  • Yu Z.Y., Zhu B.S., Cao S.L., Liu Y. (2015) Effect of virtual mass force on the mixed transport process in a multiphase rotodynamic pump, Adv. Mech. Eng. 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  • Johnson R.W. (1998) The handbook of fluid dynamics, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 21–22. [Google Scholar]
  • Schiller L., Naumann A. (1993) Fundamental calculations in gravitational processing, Z. Ver. Dtsch. Ing. 77, 318–320. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J.Y., Li Y.J., Cai S.J., Zhu H.W., Zhang Y.X. (2016) Investigation of gas-liquid two-phase flow in a three-stage rotodynamic multiphase pump via numerical simulation and visualization experiment, Adv. Mech. Eng. 8, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  • Tabib M.V., Schwarz P. (2011) Quantifying sub-grid scale (SGS) turbulent dispersion force and its effect using one-equation SGS large eddy simulation (LES) model in a gas-liquid and a liquid-liquid system, Chem. Eng. Sci. 66, 3071–3086. [Google Scholar]
  • Mohajerani M., Mehrvar M., Eincmozaffari F. (2012) CFD analysis of two-phase turbulent flow in internal airlift reactors, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 60, 1611–1630. [Google Scholar]
  • Pourtousi M., Sahu J.N., Ganesan P. (2014) Effect of interfacial forces and turbulence models on predicting flow pattern inside the bubble column, Chem. Eng. Process: Process Intensification 75, 38–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.