Numerical methods and HPC
Open Access
Issue
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 73, 2018
Numerical methods and HPC
Article Number 74
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018048
Published online 10 December 2018
  • Barry K.M., Cavers D.A., Kneale C.W. (1975) Recommended standards for digital tape formats, Geophysics 40, 2, 344–352. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bautista-Gomez L., Tsuboi S., Tsuboi S., Komatitsch D., Cappello F., Maruyama N., Matsuoka S. (2011, Nov) FTI: high performance fault tolerance interface for hybrid systems. High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC), 2011 International Conference for, IEEE 1-12. [Google Scholar]
  • Bent J., Gibson G., Grider G., McClelland B., Nowoczynski P., Nunez J., Polte M., Wingate M. (2009) PLFS: a checkpoint file system for parallel applications. Proceedings of the Conference on High Performance Computing Networking, Storage and Analysis (SC ‘09),ACM. [Google Scholar]
  • Carns P., Latham R., Ross R., Iskra K., Lang S., Riley K. (2009) 24/7 characterization of petascale I/O workloads, In Cluster Computing and Workshops, 2009. CLUSTER’09, IEEE International Conference, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • Carns P., Harms K., Allcock W., Bacon C., Lang S., Latham R., Ross R. (2011) Understanding and improving computational science storage access through continuous characterization, ACM TOS 7, 3, 8. [Google Scholar]
  • Ching A., Coloma K., Liao W.K., Choudhary A.N., Li J. (2007) High-performance techniques for parallel I/O, Handbook of Parallel Computing. [Google Scholar]
  • Folk M., Heber G., Koziol Q., Pourmal E., Robinson D. (2011) An overview of the HDF5 technology suite and its applications, Proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT 2011 Workshop on Array Databases, ACM, pp. 36–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hustoft S., Mienert J., Bünz S., Nouzé H. (2007) High-resolution 3D-seismic data indicate focussed fluid migration pathways above polygonal fault systems of the mid-Norwegian margin, Mar. Geol. 245, 1–4, 89–106. [Google Scholar]
  • Krischer L., Smith J., Lei W., Lefebvre M., Ruan Y., de Andrade E.S., Podhorszki N., Bozdağ E., Tromp J. (2016) An adaptable seismic data format, Geophy. Sup. to the MNRAS 207, 2, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar]
  • Lin F.C., Li D., Clayton R.W., Hollis D. (2013) High-resolution 3D shallow crustal structure in Long Beach, California: Application of ambient noise tomography on a dense seismic array Noise tomography with a dense array, Geophysics 78, 4, Q45–Q56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu N., Cope J., Carns P., Carothers C., Ross R., Grider G., Crume A., Maltzahn C. (2012, April) On the role of burst buffers in leadership-class storage systems, MSST, 2012 IEEE 28th Symposium, IEEE, pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  • Miller R., Boxer L. (2012) Algorithms sequential & parallel: A unified approach, Cengage Learning. [Google Scholar]
  • O’Brien G., Delaney S., Igoe M., Doherty J. (2017) Kirchhoff migration with a time-shift extended imaging condition: A synthetic example. 2017 SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists. [Google Scholar]
  • Roussel C., Keller K., Gaalich M., Gomez L.B., Bigot J. (2017) PDI, an approach to decouple I/O concerns from high-performance simulation codes. [Google Scholar]
  • Stanghellini G., Carrara G. (2017) Segy-change: The swiss army knife for the SEG-Y files, SoftwareX 6, 42–47. [Google Scholar]
  • Vishwanath V., Hereld M., Papka M.E. (2011) Toward simulation-time data analysis and I/O acceleration on leadership-class systems, Large Data Analysis and Visualization (LDAV), 2011 IEEE Symposium on 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Virtual Institute for I/O (2018, 24 May). IO500. Retrieved from https://www.vi4io.org/io500/start [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.