Open Access
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 73, 2018
Article Number 12
Number of page(s) 9
Published online 01 May 2018
  • Albinali A., Holy R., Sarak H., Ozkan E. (2016) Modeling of 1D anomalous diffusion in fractured nanoporous media, Oil Gas Sci.Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 71, 4, 56. [Google Scholar]
  • Alharthy N.S., Al Kobaisi M., Kazemi H., Graves R.M. (2012) Physics and modeling of gas flow in shale reservoirs, SPE Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 11-14 November. [Google Scholar]
  • Beskok A., Karniadakis G.E. (1999) Report: A model for flows in channels, pipes, and ducts at micro and nano scales, Microscale Thermophys. Eng. 3, 1, 43–77. [Google Scholar]
  • Cao C., Li T., Shi J., Zhang L., Fu S.X., Wang B.T. (2016) A new approach for measuring the permeability of shale featuring adsorption and ultra-low permeability, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 30, 548–556. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chareonsuppanimit P., Mohammad S.A., Robinson R.L., Khaled J., Gasem K.A.M. (2012) High-pressure adsorption of gases on shales: Measurements and modeling, Int. J. Coal Geol. 95, 2, 34–46. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Civan F. (2010) Effective correlation of apparent gas permeability in tight porous media, Transp. porous media 82, 2, 375–384. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Civan F., Rai C.S., Sondergeld C.H. (2011) Shale-gas permeability and diffusivity inferred by improved formulation of relevant retention and transport mechanisms, Transp. porous media 86, 3, 925–944. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Civan F., Rai C.S., Sondergeld C.H. (2012) Determining shale permeability to gas by simultaneous analysis of various pressure tests, SPE J. 17, 3, 717–726. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Curtis J.B. (2002) Fractured shale-gas systems, AAPG Bull. 86, 11, 1921–1938. [Google Scholar]
  • Deng J., Zhu W., Ma Q. (2014) A new seepage model for shale gas reservoir and productivity analysis of fractured well, Fuel 124, 15, 232–240. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • de Swaan A. (2014) Pressure transients in a fractal-cluster model of porous media, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 71 1, 9. [Google Scholar]
  • Fathi E., Tinni A., Akkutlu I.Y. (2012) Shale gas correction to Klinkenberg slip theory, SPE Americas Unconventional Resources Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 5–7 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Freeman C.M., Moridis G.J., Blasingame T.A. (2011) A numerical study of microscale flow behavior in tight gas and shale gas reservoir systems, Transp. porous med. 90, 1, 253–268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guo W., Xiong W., Gao S.S., Hu Z.M., Liu H.L., Yu R.Z. (2013) Impact of temperature on the isothermal adsorption/desorption characteristics of shale gas, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 40, 4, 481–485. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Javadpour F. (2009) Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone), J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 48, 8, 16–21. [Google Scholar]
  • Javadpour F., Fisher D., Unsworth M. (2007) Nanoscale gas flow in shale gas sediments, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 46, 10, 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Liu J., Chen Z., Elsworth D., Qu H., Chen D. (2011) Interactions of multiple processes during CBM extraction: A critical review, Int. J. Coal Geol. 87, 3, 175–189. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Loucks R.G., Reed R.M., Ruppel S.C., Jarvie D.M. (2009) Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett Shale, J. Sediment. Res. 79, 12, 848–861. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lu X.C., Li F.C., Watson A.T. (1995) Adsorption measurements in Devonian shales, Fuel 74, 4, 599–603. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ozkan E., Raghavan R.S., Apaydin O.G. (2010) Modeling of fluid transfer from shale matrix to fracture network, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Florence, Italy, 19–22 September. [Google Scholar]
  • Pan Z., Ma Y., Connell L.D., Down D.I., Camilleri M. (2015) Measuring anisotropic permeability using a cubic shale sample in a triaxial cell, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 26, 336–344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Passey Q.R., Bohacs K., Esch W.L., Klimentidis P., Sinha S. (2010) From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir-geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs, SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition in China, Beijing, China, 8–10 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Romero-Sarmiento M.F., Pillot D., Letort G., Lamoureux-Var V., Beaumont V., Huc, A.Y., Garcia B. (2015) New rock-eval method for characterization of unconventional shale resource systems, Oil Gas Sci.Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 71, 37. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shabro V., Torres-Verdin C., Sepehrnoori K. (2012) Forecasting gas production in organic shale with the combined numerical simulation of gas diffusion in kerogen, Langmuir desorption from kerogen surfaces, and advection in nanopores, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 8–10 October. [Google Scholar]
  • Swami V., Clarkson C.R., Settari A. (2012) Non-Darcy flow in shale nanopores: do we have a final answer? SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 30 October–1 November. [Google Scholar]
  • Villazon M., German G., Civan F., Devegowda D. (2011) Parametric investigation of shale gas production considering nano-scale pore size distribution, formation factor, and non-Darcy flow mechanisms, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 October–2 November. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.