Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 71, Number 5, September–October 2016
Article Number 60
Number of page(s) 15
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2016015
Published online 13 September 2016
  • Renard Ph., De Marsily G. (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: A review, Adv. Water Resour. 20, 5-6, 253–278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sablok C., Aziz K. (2005) Upscaling and discretization errors in reservoir simulation, SPE Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, SPE 93372, 31 January-2 February. [Google Scholar]
  • Preux C. (2011) Study of evaluation criteria for reservoir upscaling, 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC, Vienna, Austria, 23-26 May. [Google Scholar]
  • Preux C. (2012) Coarsening criteria for reservoir upscaling, 74th EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2012, Copenhaguen, Denmark, 4-7 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Preux C. (2014) About the use of quality indicators to reduce information loss when performing upscaling, Oil Gas Sci Technol. 71, 7. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Qi D., Hesketh T. (2004) Quantitative evaluation of information loss in reservoir upscaling, Pet. Sci. Technol. 22, 11, 1625–1640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Renard Ph., Allard D. (2013) Connectivity metrics for subsurface flow and transport, Adv. Water Resour. 51, 168–196. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ates H., Bahar A., El-Abd S., Charfeddine M., Kelkar M., Datta-Gupta A. (2003) Ranking and upscaling of geostatistical reservoir models using streamline simulation: A field case study, Society of Petroleum Engineers Middle East Oil Show, Bahrain, 9-12 June, SPE-81497-MS. [Google Scholar]
  • Maschio C., Schiozer D.J. (2003) A new upscaling technique based on dykstra parsons coefficient: Evaluation with streamline reservoir simulation, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 40, 1-2, 27–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Samier P., Quettier L., Thiele M. (2002) Applications of streamline simulations to reservoir studies, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 5, 4. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boschan A., Noetinger B. (2012) Scale dependence of effective hydraulic conductivity distributions in 3D heterogeneous media: A numerical study, Transp. Porous Media 94, 1, 101–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt A.G., Ewing R. (2009) Percolation Theory for Flow in Porous Media, Lecture Notes in Physics, 2nd edn., Springer. [Google Scholar]
  • Li D., Wu X.-H., Sun T., Goulding F.J., Stuart R.M., Chartrand T.A., Ramage C.J. (2010) Method for quantifying reservoir connectivity using travel times, US Patent, US 2010/0057418 A1. [Google Scholar]
  • Eymard R., Gallouët T., Herbin R. (2000) Finite volume methods, in P.G. Ciarlet, J.L. Lions (eds), Handbook of numerical analysis, Vol. VII, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 7131020. [Google Scholar]
  • Dijkstra E.W. (1959) A note on two problems in connection with graphs, Numer. Math. 1, 269271. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Fredman M.L., Tarjan R.E. (1984) Fibonacci heaps and their uses in improved network optimization algorithms, 25th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (IEEE), pp. 338–346. [Google Scholar]
  • King P.R. (1989) The use of renormalization for calculating effective perme ability, Transp. Porous Media 4, 1, 37–58. [Google Scholar]
  • Gautier Y., Noetinger B. (1997) Preferential flow-paths detection for heterogeneous reservoirs using a new renormalization technique, Transp. Porous Media 26, 1–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sanchez-Vila X., Guadagnini A., Carrera J. (2006) Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow, Rev. Geophys. 44, 3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wen X.H., Gomez-Hernandez J.J. (1996) Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: An overview, J. Hydrol. 183, 9–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardwell W.T., Parsons R.L. (1944) Average permeabilities of heterogeneous oil sands, Trans. Am. Inst. Mining Metal. Eng. 160, 34–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Loch G. (1987) Étude de la composition des perméabilités par des méthodes variationnelles, PhD Thesis, École Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemouzy P. (1991) Calcul de la perméabilité absolue effective, Technical report, Institut Français du Pétrole, Paris. [Google Scholar]
  • Duquerroix J.-P.L., Lemouzy P., Noetinger B., Romeu R.K. (1993) Influence of the permeability anisotropy ratio on large-scale properties of heterogeneous reservoirs, 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, Texas, SPE 26612, October. [Google Scholar]
  • Romeu R. (1994) Écoulement en milieu poreux hétérogènes: prise de moyenne de perméabilités en régime permanent et transitoire, PhD Thesis, University of Paris VI. [Google Scholar]
  • Christie M.A. (1996) Upscaling for reservoir simulation, J. Pet. Technol. 48, 11, 1004–1010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickup G.E., Hern C.Y. (2002) The development of appropriate upscaling procedures, Transp. Porous Media 46, 119–138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pickup G.E., Ringrose P.S., Jensen J.L., Sorbie K.S. (1994) Permeability tensors for sedimentary structures, Math. Geol. 26, 2, 227–250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Durlofsky L. (2005) Upscaling and gridding of fine scale geological models for flow simulation, 8th International Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Iles Borromees, Stresa, Italy, 20-24 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Guérillot D., Bruyelle J. (2014) A fast and accurate upscaling of transmissivities for field scale reservoir simulation, ECMOR XIV - 14th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, 8 September. [Google Scholar]
  • Christie M.A., Blunt M.J. (2001) Tenth SPE comparative solution project: A comparison of upscaling techniques, SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, SPE 66599, February. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.