Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 71, Number 1, January–February 2016
Article Number 7
Number of page(s) 21
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2014023
Published online 22 January 2016
  • Durlofsky L.J. (2003) Upscaling of geocellular models for reservoir flow simulation: a review of recent progress, Proceedings of the 7th International Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Buhl/Baden-Baden, Germany, 23-27 June.
  • Farmer C.L. (2002) Upscaling: a review, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 40, 63–78. [CrossRef]
  • Renard Ph., de Marsily G. (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: a review, Advances in Water Resources 20, 5-6, 253–278. [CrossRef]
  • Wen X.H., Gómez-Hernández J.J. (1996) Upscaling hydraulic conductivities in heterogeneous media: an overview, Journal of Hydrology 183, ix–xxxii. [CrossRef]
  • Sánchez-Vila X., Guadagnini A., Carrera J. (2006) Representative hydraulic conductivities in saturated groundwater flow, Reviews of Geophysics 44, 3.
  • Sablok C., Aziz K. (2005) Upscaling and discretization errors in reservoir simulation, SPE simulation symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 31 jan.-2 feb., SPE 93372.
  • Lodder R., Hieftje G. (1988) Quantile Analysis: a method for characterizing data distributions, Applied spectroscopie 42, section 8.
  • Preux C., (2011) Study of evaluation criteria for reservoir upscaling, 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011, Vienna, Austria, 23-26 May.
  • Qi D. (2010) Upscaling Extent vs. Information Loss in Reservoir Upscaling, Petroleum Science and Technology 28, 12, 1197–1202. [CrossRef]
  • Qi D., Hesketh T. (2004) Quantitative Evaluation of Information Loss in Reservoir Upscaling, Petroleum Science and Technology 22, 11, 1625–1640. [CrossRef]
  • Qi D., Wong P.M., Liu K. (2001) An Improved Global Upscaling Approach for Reservoir Simulation, Petroleum Science and Technology 19, 7, 8, 779–795. [CrossRef]
  • Christie M.A., Blunt M.J. (2001) Tenth SPE Comparative Solution Project: A comparison of Upscaling Techniques. SPE66599, SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, 11-14 Feb.
  • Gautier Y., Blunt M.J., Christie M. A. (1999) Nested gridding and streamline-based simulation for fast reservoir performance prediction, Computational Geosciences 3, 3-4, 295–320. [CrossRef]
  • Salazar M.O., Villa J.R. (2007) Permeability upscaling techniques for reservoir simulation. Latin American & Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 15-18 April, SPE106679.
  • Fleckenstein J.H., Fogg G.E. (2008) Efficient upscaling of hydraulic conductivity in heterogeneous alluvial aquifers, Hydrogeology Journal, 16, 7, 1239–1250. [CrossRef]
  • Boschan A., Noetinger B., (2012) Scale dependence of effective hydraulic conductivity distributions in 3D heterogeneous media: a numerical study, Transport in Porous Media 94, 1, 101–121. [CrossRef]
  • Hosseini S.A., Kelkar M. (2008) Analytical Upgridding method to preserve dynamic flow behavior, SPE Annual technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, 21-24 Sept., SPE 116113.
  • King M.J., Burn K.S., Wang P., Muralidharan V., Alvardo F., Ma X., Datta-Gupta A. (2006) Optimal Coarsening of 3D Reservoir Models for Flow Simulation, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 9, 4, 317–334. [CrossRef]
  • Deschamps R., Guy N., Preux C., Lerat O. (2011) Impact of Upscaling on 3D Modelling of SAGD in a Meander Belt, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 4, 3328–3343, Society of Petroleum Engineers - Denver, Colorado, USA, 30 Oct. - 2 Nov., SPE 147035
  • Cardwell W.T., Parsons R.L. (1944) Average permeabilities of heterogeneous oil sands, Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers 160, 34–42.
  • Renard Ph., Le Loc’h G., Ledoux E., de Marsily G., Mackay R. (2000) A fast algorithm for the estimation of the equivalent hydraulic conductivity of heterogeneous porous media, Water Resources Research 36, 12, 3567–3580. [CrossRef]
  • Li D., Kumar A. (2001) A New Efficient Averaging Technique for Scaleup of Multimillion-Cell Geologic Models, SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 4, 4, August.
  • Journel A.G., Deutsch C.V., Desbarats A.J. (1986) Power averaging for Block effective permeability. 56th California Regional meeting of SPE, Oakland. SPE 15128.
  • de Dreuzy J.-R., de Boiry P., Pichot G., Davy P. (2010) Use of power averaging for quantifying the influence of structure organization on permeability upscaling in on-lattice networks under mean parallel flow, Water Resour. Res. 46 W08519.
  • Guérillot D., Rudkiewicz J.L., Ravenne C., Renard G., Galli A. (1990) An integrated model for computer aided reservoir description: from outcrop study to fluid flow simulations, Revue de l’IFP 45, 1.
  • Duquerroix J-P.L., Lemouzy P., Noetinger B., Romeu R.K. (1993) Influence of the Permeability Anisotropy Ratio on Large-Scale Properties of Heterogeneous Reservoirs, 68th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, Texas, 3-6 October., SPE 26612.
  • Kruel-Romeu R. (1994) Écoulement en milieu poreux hétérogènes: prise de moyenne de perméabilités en régime permanent et transitoire (fluid flow through heterogeneous media: averaging permeabilities for the steady-state and transient cases), PhD Dissertation, University of Paris VI.
  • Christie M.A. (1996) Upscaling for reservoir simulation, Journal of Petroleum Technology 48, 11, 1004–1010. [CrossRef]
  • Noetinger B., Zargar G. (2004) Multiscale Description and Upscaling of Fluid Flow in Subsurface Reservoirs, Oil & Gas Science and Technology, Revue de l’IFP 59, 2, 119–139. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Pickup G.E., Hern C.Y. (2002) The Development of Appropriate Upscaling Procedures, Transport in Porous Media 46, 119–138. [CrossRef]
  • Pickup G.E., Ringrose P.S., Jensen J.L., Sorbie K.S. (1994) Permeability tensors for sedimentary structures, Mathematical Geology 26, 2, 227–250. [CrossRef]
  • Jikov V.V., Kozlov S.M., Oleinik O.A. (1994) Homogenization of Differential Operator and Integral Functionals, Springer Verlag [CrossRef]
  • Web site: www.spe.org/csp/datasets/set02.htm
  • Brooks R.H., Corey A.T. (1964) Hydraulic properties of porous media, Hydrological Papers (3), Colorado State University.
  • Gratien J.M., Guignon T., Magras J.F., Quandalle P., Ricois O. (2007) Scalability and Load Balancing Problems in Parallel Reservoir Simulation, SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, 26-28 Feb., SPE 106023.
  • http://www.beicip.com/index.php/eng/software/openflowplatform
  • Preux C., McKee F. (2011) Study and Approximation of IMPES Stability: the CFL Criteria, Proceeding of the 6th International Symposium on Finite Volumes for Complex Applications, 6-10 Juin, Pragues, Czech Republic, Fort J., Fürst J., Halama J., Herbin R., Hubert F. (eds), Springer, Vol. 1, pp. 713-721.
  • Wiener O. (1912) Abhandlungen des mathematisch, Physischen Klasse des Königlichen Sächsischen Gesellschaft des Wissenschaften 32, 509.
  • Dagan G. (1979) Models of groundwater flow in statistically homogeneous porous formations, Water Resources Research 15, 1, 47–63. [CrossRef]
  • Matheron G. (1967) Éléments pour une Théorie des Milieux Poreux, Masson, Paris.
  • Le Loc’h G. (1987) Etude de la composition des perméabilités par des méthodes variationnelles (Study of the composition of permeabilities using variational methods), PhD Dissertation, École Nationale. Supérieure des Mines de Paris.
  • Hunt G.H. (2005) Percolation theory for flow in porous media, Lecture Notes in Physics 674, 67–87, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. [CrossRef]
  • Preux C., Ding D., Duval T. (2010) A new method of near-well upscaling for reservoir simulations based on optimization, Third International Conference on Porous Media and its applications in Science, Engineering and Industry, Montecatini, Italia, 20-25 June.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.