- Alston R.B., Kokolis G.P., James C.F. (1985) CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressure: a Correlation for Impure CO2 and live oil systems, SPE J. April, 268–274. [Google Scholar]
- Ayirala S.C., Rao D.N. (2006) Comparative Evaluation of a new MMP Determination Technique, SPE Paper 99606, presented at the 2006 SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA, 22-26 April. [Google Scholar]
- Benham A.L., Dowden W.E., Kunzman W.J. (1960) Miscible Fluid Displacement – Prediction of Miscibility Pressure, J. Pet. Technol. Trans. AIME, 219, 229–237. [Google Scholar]
- Brieman L., Friedman J.H. (1985) Estimating optimal transformations for multiple regressions and correlation, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 80, 391, 580–619. [Google Scholar]
- Bryant D.W., Monger T.G. (1988) Multiple Contact Phase Behaviour Measurement and Application with the Mixtures of CO2 and Highly Asphaltic Crude, SPE Reserv. Eng. 3, 2, 701–710, SPE paper 14438-PA, doi: 10.2118/14438-PA. [Google Scholar]
- Christiansen R.L., Haines H.K. (1984) Rapid Measurement of Minimum Miscibility Pressure with the Rising-Bubble Apparatus, SPE Paper 13114 presented at the 1984 Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 16-19 Sept. [Google Scholar]
- Cronquist C. (1978) Carbon Dioxide Dynamic Miscibility with Light Reservoir Oils, Paper presented at the Fourth Annual US DOE Symposium, Tulsa, Vol. lb-Oil, 28-30 Aug. [Google Scholar]
- Datta-Gupta A., Xue Guoping, Sang Heon Lee (1996) Nonparametric Transformations for Data Correlation and Integration: From Theory to Practice, Department of Petroleum Engineering Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA. [Google Scholar]
- De Veaux R.D. (1989) Finding Transformations for Regression Using the ACE Algorithm, Sociological Methods Res. 18, 327–359. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Elsharkawy A.M., Poettmann F.H., Christiansen R.L. (1992) Measuring Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Slim-Tube or Rising-Bubble Method? SPE/DOE Paper 24114 presented at SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22-24 April. [Google Scholar]
- Enich R.M., Holder G.D., Mosri B.I. (1988) A thermodynamic correlation for the MMP in CO2 flooding of petroleum reservoirs, SPE Reserv. Eng. 3, 1, 81–92. [Google Scholar]
- Friedman J.H., Stuetzle W. (1981) Projection pursuit regression, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 76, 817–823. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
- Gasem K.A.M., Dickson K.B., Shaver R.D., Robinson Jr R.L. (1993) Experimental phase densities and interfacial tensions for a CO2/Synthetic-oil and a CO2/reservoir-oil system, SPE Reserv. Eng. 8, 3, 170–174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Glaso O. (1985) Generalized Minimum Miscibility Pressure Correlation, SPE J 25, 6, 927–934. [Google Scholar]
- Hagen S., Kossack C.A. (1986) Determination of Minimum Miscibility Pressure Using a High-Pressure Visual Sapphire Cell, SPE Paper 14927 presented at SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 20-23 April. [Google Scholar]
- Harmon R.A., Grigg R.B. (1988) Vapour Density Measurement for Estimating Minimum Miscibility Pressure, SPE Reserv. Eng. 11, 1215–1220. [Google Scholar]
- Holm L.W., Josendal V.A. (1974) Mechanisms of Oil Displacement by Carbon Dioxide, J. Pet. Technol. 26, 12, 1427–1438, SPE J. 4736-PA. [Google Scholar]
- Huang S.S., Dyer S.B. (1993) Miscible Displacement in the Weyburn Reservoir; A Laboratory Study, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 32, 7, 42–50. [Google Scholar]
- Huang S.S., De Wit P., Srivastava R.K., Jha K.N. (1994) A Laboratory Miscible Displacement Study for the Recovery of Saskatchewan’s Crude Oil, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 33, 4, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
- Jessen K., Orr F.M. Jr (2008) On IFT measurements for prediction of the minimum miscibility pressure, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 11, 5, 933–939. [Google Scholar]
- Jessen K., Michelsen M.L., Stenby E. (1998) Global Approach for Calculation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure, Fluid Phase Equilib. 153, 2, 251–263, doi: 10.1016/S0378-3812(98)00414-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jessen K., Stenby E.H., Orr Jr F.M. (2004) Interplay of Phase Behaviour and Numerical Dispersion in Finite Difference Compositional Simulation of Gas Injection Processes, SPE paper 75134-MS, SPE. J. 9, 2, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
- Johns R.T., Sah P., Solano R. (2002) Effect of Dispersion on Local Displacement Efficiency for Multicomponent Enriched-Gas Floods Above the Minimum Miscibility Enrichment, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 5, 1, 4–10, SPE paper 75806-PA, doi: 10.2118/75806-PA. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson J.P., Pollin J.S. (1981) Measurement and Correlation of CO2 Miscibility Pressures, SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 5-8 April. [Google Scholar]
- Kechut N.I., Zain Z.M., Ahmad N., Raja D.M.I. (1999) New Experimental Approaches in Minimum Miscibility Pressure (MMP) Determination, SPE Paper 57286 Presented in the SPE Asia Pacific Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25-26 Oct. [Google Scholar]
- Kuo S.S. (1985) Prediction of Miscibility for the Enriched-Gas Drive Process, SPE Paper 14152 presented at the 60th SPE Technical Conference, Las Vegas, Nevada, 22-26 Sept. [Google Scholar]
- Mallallah A., Gharbi R., Algharaib M. (2006) Accurate Estimation of the World Crude Oil Properties Using Graphical Alternating Conditional Expectation, Energy Fuels 20, 2, 688–698. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Menzie D.E., Nielsen R.F. (1963) A Study of the Vaporization of Crude Oil by Carbon Dioxide Repressuring, J. Pet. Technol. 15, 11, 1247–1252, doi: 10.2118/568-PA. [Google Scholar]
- Novosad Z., Sibbald L.R., Costain T.G. (1989) Design of miscible solvents for a rich gas drive-comparison of slim tube tests with rising bubble tests, Paper presented at CIM 40th Annual Technical Meeting, Banff. [Google Scholar]
- Orr F.M., Jensen C.M. (1984) Interpretation of Pressure Composition Phase Diagram for CO2/Crude-Oil Systems, SPE J. 10, 485–497. [Google Scholar]
- Orr F.M., Silva M.K. (1987) Effect of Oil Composition on Minimum Miscibility Pressure-Part 2: Correlation, SPE Reserv. Eng. 27, 6, 479–491. [Google Scholar]
- Orr F.M., Johns R.T., Dindoruk B. (1993) Development of Miscibility in Four- Component CO2 Floods, SPE Reserv. Eng. 8, 2, 135–142, SPE paper 22637-PA, doi: 10.2118/22637-PA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Rao D.N. (1997) A New Technique of Vanishing Interfacial Tension for Miscibility Determination, Fluids Phase Equilibr. 139, 311–324. [Google Scholar]
- Rathmell J.J., Stalkup F.I., Hassinger R.C. (1971) A laboratory investigation of miscible displacement by CO2, SPE paper 3483-MS, presented at the Fall Meeting of the SPE of AIME, New Orleans, Louisiana, 3-6 Oct. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava R.K., Huang S.S. (1998) New Interpretation Technique for Determining Minimum Miscibility Pressure by Rising, SPE Paper 39566 presented at SPE India Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, New Delhi, India, 17-19 Feb. [Google Scholar]
- Srivastava R.K., Huang S.S., Dyer S.B., Mourits F.M. (1994) A Comparison of MMP Determinations for Weyburn CO2 Solvent Design, Paper # 94-50 presented at the 45th Annual Technical Meeting Organized by the Petroleum Society of CIM and AOSTRA, Calgary, 12-15 June. [Google Scholar]
- Stalkup F.I. (1987) Displacement Behavior of the Condensing/Vaporizing Gas Drive Process, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, Texas, 27-30 Sept., doi: 10.2118/16715-MS. [Google Scholar]
- Stalkup F.I., Lo L.L., Dean R.H. (1990) Sensitivity to Gridding of Miscible Flood Predictions Made with Upstream Differenced Simulators, SPE/DOE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 22-25 April, doi: 10.2118/20178-MS. [Google Scholar]
- Turek E., Metcalfe R., Fishback R. (1988) Phase Behaviour of Several CO2/ West Texas-Reservoir-Oil Systems, SPE Reserv. Eng. 3, 2, 505–516, doi: 10.2118/13117-PA. [Google Scholar]
- Wang D., Murphy M. (2004) Estimating Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression Using the ACE Algorithm, J. Data Sci. 2, 4, 329–346. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Peck D.G. (2000) Analytical Calculation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure: Comprehensive Testing and its Application in a Quantitative Analysis of the Effect of Numerical Dispersion for Different Miscibility Development Mechanisms, SPE paper 59378 presented at SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium, 3-5 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma. [Google Scholar]
- Wang Y., Orr J. (1997) Analytical Calculation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure, Fluid Phase Equilibr. 139, 1-2, 101–124, doi: 10.1016/S0378-3812(97)00179-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C.H., Soto R.D., Valko P.P., Bubela A.M. (2000) Non-Parametric regression and neural-network infill drilling recovery models for carbonate reservoirs, Comput. Geosci. 26, 9, 975–987. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Xue G., Datta-Gupta A., Valko P., Blasingame T. (1997) Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression: Application to Permeability Estimation from Well Logs, SPE Form. Eval. 12, 2, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
- Yellig W.F., Metcalfe R.S. (1980) Determination and Prediction of CO2 Minimum Miscibility Pressures, J. Petrol. Technol. 30, 1, 160–168. [Google Scholar]
- Yuan H., Johns R.T., Egwuenu A.M., Dindoruk B. (2004) Improved MMP Correlations for CO2 Floods Using Analytical Gas Flooding Theory, SPE Paper 89359 presented at SPE/DOE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, Oklahoma, 17-21 April. [Google Scholar]
- Yurkiw F.J., Flock D.L. (1994) A Comparative Investigation of Minimum Miscibility Pressure Correlations for Enhanced Oil Recovery, Paper presented at the Petroleum Society Annual Technical Meeting, Calgary, Alberta. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou D., Orr F.M. Jr. (1995) An Analysis of Rising Bubble Experiments to Determine Minimum Miscibility Pressures, SPE Paper 30786, Presented at SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, 22-25 Oct. [Google Scholar]
- Zick A.A. (1986) A Combined Condensing/Vaporizing Mechanism in the Displacement of Oil by Enriched Gases, Proceedings of SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 5-8 Oct, doi: 10.2118/15493-MS. [Google Scholar]
Open Access
Issue |
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 70, Number 6, November–December 2015
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 967 - 982 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2012097 | |
Published online | 13 June 2013 |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.