- Akhurst M., Pearce J., Hannis S, Shi J.Q., Delprat-Jannaud F., Bossie-Codreanu D., (2015) Risk-led characterisation of the SiteChar UK North Sea site for the geological storage of CO2, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 567–586. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Baroni A., Estublier A., Vincké O., Delprat-Jannaud F., Nauroy J.F. (2015) Dynamic fluid flow and geomechanical coupling to assess the CO2 storage integrity in faulted structures, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 729–751. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Beaubien S., Ruggiero L., Annunziatellis A., Bigi S., Ciotoli G., Deiana P., Graziani S., Lombardi S., Tartarello M. (2015) The importance of baseline surveys of near-surface gas geochemistry for CCS monitoring, as shown from onshore case studies in northern and southern Europe, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 615–633. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Békri S., Renard S., Delprat-Jannaud F. (2015) Pore to core scale simulation of the mass transfer with mineral reaction in porous media, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 681–693. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Brunsting S., Mastop J., Kaiser M., Zimmer R. (2013) SiteChar deliverable D8.5, Final summary report on public awareness, http://www.sitechar-CO2.eu/. [Google Scholar]
- Brunsting S., Mastop J., Kaiser M., Zimmer R., Shackley S., Mabon L., Howell R. (2015) CCS acceptability: social site characterization and advancing awareness at prospective storage sites in Poland and Scotland, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 767–784. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- CO2CRC (2008) Storage capacity estimation, site selection and characterisation for CO2 storage projects, CO2CRC report RPT08-1001. [Google Scholar]
- Chadwick A., Arts R., Bernstone C., May F., Thibeau S., Zweigel P. (2008) Best practice for the storage of CO2 in saline aquifers - observations and guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE projects, Nottingham, UK, British Geological Survey, 267 pp., (British Geological Survey Occasional Publication, 14). [Google Scholar]
- DECC (2010) Guidance notes for the sampling and analysis of produced water and other hydrocarbon discharges, the Offshore Petroleum Activities (Oil Pollution Prevention and Control) Regulations 2005, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/62697/produced-water-sampling-guidelines.doc. [Google Scholar]
- Delprat-Jannaud F., Akhurst M., Pearce J., Nielsen C., Lothe A., Volpi V., Neele F. (2013a) Characterisation of storage sites: Synthesis and lessons learned from the application of the SiteChar workflow, SiteChar Report D2.1, http://www.sitechar-CO2.eu/. [Google Scholar]
- Delprat-Jannaud F., Akhurst M., Pearce J., Nielsen C. (2013b) Characterisation of storage sites: Best practices and Guidelines developed from the SiteChar project, SiteChar Report D2.4, http://www.sitechar-CO2.eu/. [Google Scholar]
- DNV (2010) Guideline for selection and qualification of sites and projects for geological storage of CO2 www.dnv.com.au/binaries/CO2QUALSTORE_guideline_tcm162-412142.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- EC (2009) Storage Directive 2009/31/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0114:0135:EN:PDF. [Google Scholar]
- EC (2011) Implementation of Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide – Guidance document 2 – Characterization of the storage complex, CO2 stream composition, monitoring and corrective measures, http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/lowcarbon/docs/gd2_en.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Gruson J.F., Serbutoviez S., Delprat-Jannaud F., Akhurst M., Nielsen C., Dalhoff F., Bergmo P., Bos C., Volpi V., Iacobellis S. (2015) Techno-economic assessment of four CO2 storage sites, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 753–766. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- IEA (2013) Technology roadmap: Carbon capture and storage, OECD/IEA, France, www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/TechnologyRoadmapCarbonCaptureandStorage.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Kempka T., Nielsen C., Frykman P., Shi J.Q., Bacci G., Dalhoff F. (2015) Coupled hydro-mechanical simulations of CO2 storage supported by pressure management demonstrate synergy benefits from simultaneous formation fluid extraction, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 599–613. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Neele F., Delprat-Jannaud F., Vincké O., Volpi V., Nepveu M., Hofstee C., Wollenweber J., Lothe A., Brunsting B., Pearce J., Battani A., Baroni A., Garcia B., Akhurst M. (2013) SiteChar deliverable D1.4, Site characterisation workflow, http://www.sitechar-CO2.eu/. [Google Scholar]
- Nepveu M., Neele F., Delprat-Jannaud F., Akhurst M., Vincké O., Volpi V., Lothe A., Brunsting S., Pearce J., Battani A., Baroni A., Garcia B., Hofstee C., Wollenweber J. (2015) CO2 storage feasibility: A workflow for site characterization, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 555–566. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- NETL (2010) Best practices for: Site screening, site selection, and initial characterisation for storage of CO2 in deep geologic formations, www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/refshelf/BPM-SiteScreening.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen C., Frykman F., Dalhoff F. (2015) How to characterise a potential site for GCS with sparse data coverage – a Danish onshore site case, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 587–598. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Papiernik B., Doligez B., Klimkowski K. (2015) Structural and parametric models of the Załęcze and Żuchlów gas fields region, Fore-Sudetic Monocline, Poland, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 635–654. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- SCCS (Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage) (2009) Opportunities for CO2 Storage around Scotland — an integrated strategic research study, 56 pp., http://www.erp.ac.uk/sccs, Accessed: September 2009. [Google Scholar]
- SCCS (Scottish Centre for Carbon Storage) (2011) Progressing Scotland’s CO2 Storage opportunities, 60 pp., http://www.sccs.org.uk/progress-to-co2-storage-scotland, Accessed: March 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Scottish Power CCS Consortium (2011) CCS Project Costs (UKCCS - KT - S7.21 - Shell – 002), UK Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Competition Talisman Energy. 2011 Ross and Blake fields (Bleo Holm), http://www.talisman-energy.com/upload/media_element/112/04/bleo_holm_2011.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Volpi V., Forlin F., Donda F., Civile D., Facchin L., Sauli S., Merson B., Sinza-Mendieta K., Shams A. (2015a) Southern Adriatic Sea as a potential area for CO2 geological storage, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 713–728. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Volpi V., Forlin E., Baroni A., Estublier A., Donda F., Civile D., Vincké O., Delprat-Jannaud F. (2015b) Evaluation and characterization of potential CO2 storage site in the South Adriatic offshore, Oil & Gas Science and Technology 70, 4, 695–712. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- ZEP (2011) The cost of CO2 storage, http://www.zeroemissionsplatform.eu/library/publication/168-zep-cost-report-storage.html. [Google Scholar]
| Issue |
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 70, Number 4, July–August 2015
Dossier: Characterization of European CO2 Storage – European Project SiteChar
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 531 - 554 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2014059 | |
| Published online | 30 July 2015 | |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.