Dossier: Characterization of European CO2 Storage – European Project SiteChar
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 70, Number 4, July–August 2015
Dossier: Characterization of European CO2 Storage – European Project SiteChar
Page(s) 555 - 566
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2014034
Published online 27 May 2015
  • Akhurst M., Pearce J., Hannis S., Shi J.Q., Delprat-Jannaud F., Bossie-Codreanu D. (2015) Risk-Led Characterisation of a Site for the Geological Storage of CO2, Oil & Gas Science and Technology (this issue). DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2015013. [Google Scholar]
  • Bachu S., Bonijoly D., Bradshaw J., Burruss R., Holloway S., Christensen N.P., Mathiassen O.M. (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Contr. 1, 430–443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beaubien S., Ruggiero L., Annunziatellis A., Bigi S., Ciotoli G., Deiana P., Graziani S., Lombardi S., Tartarello M. (2015) The Importance of Baseline Surveys of Near-Surface Gas, Geochemistry for CCS Monitoring, as Shown from Onshore Case Studies in Northern and Southern Europe, Oil & Gas Science and Technology (this issue). DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2014009. [Google Scholar]
  • Brunsting S., Mastop J., Kaiser M., Zimmer R., Shackley S., Mabon L., Howell R. (2015) CCS acceptability: Social Site Characterization and Advancing Awareness at Prospective Storage Sites in Poland and Scotland, Oil &. Gas Science and Technology (this issue). DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2014024. [Google Scholar]
  • CO2CRC (2008) Storage capacity estimation, site selection and characterisation for CO2 storage projects, CO2CRC report RPT08-1001. [Google Scholar]
  • CSA Group (2012) Geological storage of carbon dioxide, Standard Z741-12. [Google Scholar]
  • DNV (2009) CO2 Qualstore – Guideline for selection and qualification of sites and projects for geological storage of CO2 DNV report 2009-1425. [Google Scholar]
  • DNV (2012) Geological storage of carbon dioxide, DNV-RP-J203. [Google Scholar]
  • EU (2009) Storage Directive 2009/31/EC, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:140:0114:0135:EN:PDF. [Google Scholar]
  • EU (2011) Implementation of Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide – Guidance document 2 – Characterisation of the storage complex, CO2 stream composition, monitoring and corrective measures (ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/lowcarbon/docs/gd2_en.pdf). [Google Scholar]
  • Gruson J.-F., Serbutoviez S., Delprat-Jannaud F., Akhurst M., Nielsen C., Dalhoff F., Bergmo P., Bos C., Volpi V., Lacobellis S. (2015) Techno-Economic Assessment of Four CO2, Storage Sites, Oil & Gas Science and Technology (this issue). DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2014057. [Google Scholar]
  • Hanche-Olsen H. (2004) Buckingham’s pi-theorem. http://www.math.ntnu.no/~hanche/notes/buckingham/buckingham-a4.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • IEA (2013) Technology roadmap – carbon capture and storage, Paris, available at http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CCS_Roadmap.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Lako P., van der Welle A.J., Harmelink M., van der Kuip M.D.C., Haan-Kamminga A., Blank F., de Wolff J., Nepveu M. (2011) Issues concerning the implementation of the CCS Directive in the Netherlands, Energy Procedia 4, 5479–5486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Neele F., Nepveu M., Hofstee C., Meindertsma W. (2011) CO2 storage capacity assessment methodology, TNO report TNO-060-UT-2011-00810, report available at http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/co2-storage-capacity-assessment-methodology. [Google Scholar]
  • Neele F.P., ten Veen J., Wilschut F., Hofstee C. (2012) Independent assessment of high-capacity offshore CO2 storage options, TNO report TNO-060-UT-2012-00414/B, report available at http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/publications/independent-assessment-high-capacity-offshore-co2-storage-options. [Google Scholar]
  • Neele F., Delprat-Jannaud F., Akhurst M., Vincke O., Volpi V., Nepveu M., Hofstee C., Wollenweber J., Lothe A., Brunsting S., Pearce J., Battani A., Baroni A., Garcia B. (2013) SiteChar, Characterisation of European CO2 Storage, Deliverable No D1.4 SiteChar Characterisation Workflow. [Google Scholar]
  • Nepveu M., Yavuz F., David P. (2009) FEP Analysis and Markov Chains, Energy Procedia 1, 2519–2523. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • NETL (2010) Site screening, selection and initial characterisation for storage of CO2 in deep geological formations, DOE report DOE/NETL-401/090808. [Google Scholar]
  • NSBTF (North Sea Basin Task Force) (2009) Monitoring Verification Accrediting and Reporting (MVAR) Report for CO2 storage deep under the seabed of the North Sea. [Google Scholar]
  • Ramirez A., Hagedoorn S., Kramers L., Wildenborg T., Hendriks C. (2010) Screening CO2 options in the Netherlands, Int. Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4 2, 367–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • SAMCARDS (2003) Safety Assessment Methodology for CO2 Sequestration, DOE DE-FC26-01NT41145. [Google Scholar]
  • UK Carbon Capture and Storage Demonstration Competition (2011) ukccs-kt-s7.24-shell-001-operations-philosophy.pdf, ScottishPower CCS Consortium. [Google Scholar]
  • Vangkilde-Pedersen T., Lyng Anthonsen K., Smith N., Kirk K., Neele F., van der Meer B., Le Gallo Y., Bossie-Codreanu D., Wojcicki A., Le Nindre Y.-M., Hendriks C., Dalhoff F., Christensen N.P. (2009) Assessing European capacity for geological storage of carbon dioxide – the EU GeoCapacity project, Energy Procedia 1, 2663–2670. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Volpi V., Forlin E., Baroni A., Estublier A., Donda F., Civile D., Caffau M., Kuczynsky S., Vincké O., Delprat-Jannaud F. (2015) Evaluation and Characterization of Potential CO2 Storage Site in the South Adriatic Offshore, Oil & Gas Science and Technology (this issue). DOI: 10.2516/ogst/2015011. [Google Scholar]
  • Wollenweber J., Busby D., Wessel-Berg D., Nepveu M., Bossie Codreanu D., Grimstad A.-A., Sijacic D., Maurand N., Lothe A., Wahl F., Polak S., Boot H., Grøver A., Wildenborg T. (2013) Integrated Carbon Risk Assessment (ICARAS), Energy Procedia 37, 4825–4832. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.