Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 70, Number 3, May–June 2015
Page(s) 475 - 486
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013214
Published online 21 April 2014
  • Andrew S.P.S. (1981) Theory and practice of the formulation of heterogeneous catalysts, Chemical Engineering Science 36 (9), 1431–1445. [CrossRef]
  • ASTM C1239-00 (2005) Standard practice for reporting uniaxial strength data and estimating Weibull distribution parameters for advanced ceramics, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • ASTM D4179-01 (2001) Standard test method for single pellet crush strength of formed catalyst shapes, ASTM International.
  • ASTM D6175-03 (2003) Standard test method for radial crush strength of extruded catalyst and catalyst carrier particles, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • Bažant Z.P., Planas J. (1998) Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials, CRC Press, Boca Raton.
  • Beaver E.R. (1975) Mechanical testing of catalysts, Chemical Engineering Progress 71 (1), 44–45.
  • Bergman B. (1986) Estimation of Weibull parameters using a weight function, Journal of Materials Science 5 (6), 611–614.
  • Denny P.J., Twigg M.V. (1980) Factor determining the life of industrial heterogeneous catalysts, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 6, 577–599. [CrossRef]
  • Euzen P., Raybaud P., Krokidis X., Toulhoat H., Le Loarer J.L., Jolivet J.P., Froidefond C. (2002) Chapter 4.7.2. Alumina, in Handbook of Porous Solids, Schüth F., Sing K.S.W., Weitkamp J. (eds),Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Weinheim.
  • Fulton J.W. (1986) Testing the catalyst, Chemical Engineering Journal 93 (19), 71–77.
  • Gallei E., Schwab E. (1999) Development of technical catalysts, Catalysis Today 51 (3–4), 535–546. [CrossRef]
  • Griffith A.A. (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solid, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A 221, 163–175. [CrossRef]
  • Kanninen M.F., Popelar C.H. (1985) Advanced Fracture Mechanics, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Lawn B.R. (1993) Fracture of Brittle Solids – Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. [CrossRef]
  • Lemaitre J., Chaboche J.L. (2004) Mécanique des milieux continus, Dunod, 2e éd, Paris.
  • Li Y.D., Chang L., Li Z. (1989) Measurement methods and reliability analyses for mechanical strength of solid oxide catalysts, Journal of Tianjin University 3, 9–17.
  • Li Y.D., Li X.M., Chang L., Wu D.H., Fang Z.P., Shi Y.H. (1999) Understandings on the scattering property of the mechanical strength data of solid catalysts: a statistical analysis of iron-based high-temperature shift catalysts, Catalysis Today 51 (1), 73–84. [CrossRef]
  • Li Y.D., Wu D.F., Zhang J.P., Chang L., Wu D.H., Fang Z.P., Shi Y.H. (2000) Measurement and statistics of single pellet mechanical strength of differently shaped catalysts, Powder Technology 113 (1–2), 176–184. [CrossRef]
  • Li Y., Wu D., Lin Y.S. (2004) Mechanical strength and reliability of solid catalysts, China Particuology 2 (2), 53–62. [CrossRef]
  • Lu C., Danzer R., Fischer F.D. (2004) Scaling of fracture strength in ZnO: Effects of pore/grain-size interaction and porosity, Journal of European Ceramic Society 24 (14), 3643–3651. [CrossRef]
  • Standard National of China GB-3635-83 (1983) Determination of granular crush-strength for fertilizer catalyst, molecular sieve and adsorbent, National Standard Bureau, Beijing.
  • National Standard of China GB-10505.1-89 (1989) Determination of granular crush-strength for molecular sieve 3A, National Standard Bureau, Beijing.
  • Richardson J.T. (1989) Principles of Catalyst Development, Plenum Press, New York. [CrossRef]
  • Sanahuja J., Dormieux L., Meille S., Hellmich C., Fritsch A. (2010) Micromechanical Explanation of Elasticity and Strength of Gypsum: From Elongated Anisotropic Crystals to Isotropic Porous Polycrystals, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 136 (2), 239–253. [CrossRef]
  • Subero-Couroyer C., Ghadiri M., Brunard N., Kolenda F. (2003) Weibull analysis of quasi-static crushing strength of catalyst particles, Chemical Engineering Research and Design 81 (8), 953–962. [CrossRef]
  • Timoshenko S.P., Goodier J.N. (1970) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn., McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Trustrum K., Jayatilaka A.D.S. (1983) Applicability of Weibull analysis for brittle materials, Journal of Materials Science 18 (9), 2765–2770. [CrossRef]
  • Wachtman J.B., Cannon W.R., Matthewson M.J. (2009) Mechanical Properties of Ceramics, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. [CrossRef]
  • Weibull W. (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability, Journal of Applied Mechanics 18 (3), 293–297.
  • Wu D.F., Li Y.D. (2002) Effects of the impregnating and drying process factors on the mechanical properties of a PCoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalyst, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis 143, 101–109.
  • Wu D.F., Li Y., Zhang J., Chang L., Wu D., Fang Z., Shi Y. (2001) Effects of the number of testing specimens and the estimation methods on the Weibull parameters of solid catalysts, Chemical Engineering Science 56 (24), 7035–7044. [CrossRef]
  • Wu D.F., Li Y.D., Shi Y.H., Fang Z.P., Wu D.H., Chang L. (2002) Effects of the calcination conditions on the mechanical properties of a PCoMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalyst, Chemical Engineering Science 57 (17), 3495–3504. [CrossRef]
  • Wu D.F., Song L.Y., Zhang B.Q., Li Y.D. (2003) Effect of the mechanical failure of catalyst pellets on the pressure drop of a reactor, Chemical Engineering Science 58 (17), 3995–4004. [CrossRef]
  • Wu D.F., Zhou J.C., Li Y.D. (2006) Unbiased estimation of Weibull parameters with the linear regression method, Journal of European Ceramic Society 26 (7), 1099–1105. [CrossRef]
  • Wu D.F., Zhou J., Li Y. (2007) Mechanical Strength of Solid Catalysts: Recent Developments and Future Prospects, AIChE Journal 53 (10), 2618–2629. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.