IFP Energies nouvelles International Conference: MAPI 2012: Multiscale Approaches for Process Innovation
Open Access
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 68, Number 6, November-December 2013
IFP Energies nouvelles International Conference: MAPI 2012: Multiscale Approaches for Process Innovation
Page(s) 1093 - 1108
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2012104
Published online 12 September 2013
  • Abu-Zahra M., Schneiders L.H.J., Niederer J.P.M., Feron P.H.M., Versteeg. G.F. (2007) CO2 capture from power plants. Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 37-46. [CrossRef]
  • Alix P., Raynal L. (2009) Pressure Drop and Mass Transfer of a High Capacity Random Packing. Application to CO2 Postcombustion Capture, Energy Procedia 1, 845-852. [CrossRef]
  • Alix P., Raynal L., Abbe F., Meyer M., Prevost M., Rouzineau D. (2011) Mass transfer and hydrodynamic characteristics of new carbon carbon packing: Application to CO2 post-combustion capture, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89, 1658-1668. [CrossRef]
  • Ataki A., Bart H.J. (2006) Experimental and CFD simulation study for the wetting of a structured packing element with liquids, Chem. Eng. Technol. 29, 3, 336-347. [CrossRef]
  • Berner G.G., Zuiderweg F.J. (1978) Radial liquid spread and maldistribution in packed columns under different wetting conditions, Chem. Eng. Sci. 33, 1637-1643. [CrossRef]
  • Billet R. (1995) Packed Towers, VCH Eds., Weinheim.
  • Blazek J. (2001) Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and applications, Elsevier Ed.
  • Danckwerts P.V. (1970) Gas-Liquid Reactions, McGraw-Hill, New-York.
  • Darde V., Thomsen K., van Well W.J.M., Stenby E.H. (2010) Chilled ammonia process for CO2 capture, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 131-136. [CrossRef]
  • Dugas R., Alix P., Lemaire E., Broutin P., Rochelle G. (2009) Absorber model for CO2 capture by monoethanolamine — application to CASTOR pilot results, Energy Procedia 1, 103-107. [CrossRef]
  • Duss M., Menon A. (2010) Optimized Absorber Design for Post-Combustion CCS, Proc. of the Distillation and Absorption 2010 Conference, 12-15 Sept., Eidhoven, The Netherlands, pp. 109-114.
  • Fourati M., Roig V., Raynal L. (2012) Experimental study of liquid spreading in structured packings, Chem. Eng. Sci. 80, 1-15. [CrossRef]
  • Haroun Y., Legendre D., Raynal L. (2010a) Direct Numerical Simulation of Reactive Absorption in Gas-Liquid Flow on Structured Packing using Interface Capturing Method, Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 1, 351-356. [CrossRef]
  • Haroun Y., Legendre D., Raynal L. (2010b) Volume of fluid method for interfacial reactive mass transfer: Application to stable liquid film, Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 10, 2896-2909. [CrossRef]
  • Haroun Y., Raynal L., Legendre D. (2012) Mass transfer and liquid hold-up determination in structured packing by CFD, Chem. Eng. Sci. 75, 342-348. [CrossRef]
  • Higbie R. (1935) The rate of absorption of a pure gas into a still liquid during short periods of exposure. Trans. A.I.Ch.E., 35, 365-389.
  • Hoek P.J., Wesselingh J.A., Zuiderweg F.J. (1986) Small scale and large scale liquid maldistribution in packed columns, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 64, 431-449.
  • International Energy Agency (2009) Technology Roadmap, CCS, Available at: http://www.iea.org/papers/2009/CCS_Roadmap.pdf.
  • Knudsen J.N. (2009) Pilot-scale testing in Cesar, European Conference on CCS research, 10-11 Feb., Oslo, Norway.
  • Knudsen J.N., Jensen J.N., Vilhelmsen P.-J., Biede O. (2009) Experience with CO2 capture from coal flue gas in pilot-scale: testing of different amine solvents, Energy Procedia 1, 783-790. [CrossRef]
  • Koch-Glitsch (2003) Intalox packed tower systems, Bulletin KGIMTP-1, Koch-Glitsch.
  • Kohrt M., Ausner I., Wozny G., Repke J.-U. (2011) Texture influence on liquid-side mass transfer, Chem. Eng. Res. Desi. 89, 1405-1413. [CrossRef]
  • Lemaire E., Bouillon P.A., Gomez A., Kittel J., Gonzalez S., Carrette P.L., Delfort B., Mougin P., Alix P., Normand L. (2011) New IFP optimized first generation process for postcombustion carbon capture: Hicapt + TM, Energy Procedia 4, 1361-1368. [CrossRef]
  • Ma’mum S., Svendsen H.F., Hoff K.A., Juliussen O. (2007) Selection of new absorbents for carbon dioxide capture, Energy Convers. Manage. 48, 251-258. [CrossRef]
  • Mathias P.M., Reddy S., Connell J.P. (2010) Quantitative evaluation of the chilled-ammonia process for CO2 capture using thermodynamic analysis and process simulation, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 4, 174-179. [CrossRef]
  • Menon A., Duss M. (2011) Sulzer – reducing the energy penalty for post-combustion CO2 capture, Carbon Capture J. Sept.-Oct., 2-5.
  • Menon A., Duss M., Bachmann C. (2009) Post-combustion capture of CO2, PTQ 2, 115-121.
  • Nakov S.V., Kolev N., Ljutzkanov L., Kolev D. (2007) Comparison of the effective area of some highly effective packings, Chem. Eng. Process. 46, 1385-1390. [CrossRef]
  • Nicoud F., Ducros F. (1999) Subgrid-Scale Stress Modelling Based on the Square of the Velocity Gradient Tensor, Flow Turbulence Combust. 62, 3, 183-200. [CrossRef]
  • Olujic Z., van Baak R., Haaring J. (2006) Liquid distribution behaviour of conventional and high capacity structured packings, Distillation and Absorption, IChemE Symp. Series n° 152, 252-266.
  • Petre C.F., Larachi F., Illiuta I., Grandjean B.P.A. (2003) Pressure drop through structured packings: breakdown into the contributing mechanisms by CFD modeling, Chem. Eng. Sci. 58, 163-177. [CrossRef]
  • Piomelli U. (1998) Large-Eddy Simulation: Present State and Future Perspectives, AIAA Paper 98-0534.
  • Porcheron F., Gibert A., Jacquin M., Mougin P., Faraj A., Goulon A., Bouillon P.-A., Delfort B., Le Pennec D., Raynal L. (2011) High Throughput Screening of amine thermodynamic properties applied to post-combustion CO2 capture process evaluation, Energy Procedia 4, 15-22. [CrossRef]
  • Puxty G., Rowland R., Allport A., Yang Q., Bown M., Burns R., Madder M., Attala M. (2009) Carbon Dioxide Postcombustion Capture: A Novel Screening Study of the Carbon Dioxide Absorption Performance of 76 Amines, Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 6427-6433. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Raynal L., Royon-Lebeaud A. (2007) A multi-scale approach for CFD calculations of gas-liquid flow within large size column equipped with structured packing, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62, 7196-7204. [CrossRef]
  • Raynal L., Boyer C., Ballaguet J.-P. (2004) Liquid holdup and pressure drop determination in structured packing with CFD simulations, Can. J. Chem. Eng. 82, 871-879. [CrossRef]
  • Raynal L., Bouillon P.A., Gomez A., Broutin P. (2011) From MEA to demixing solvents and future steps, a roadmap for lowering the cost of post-combustion carbon capture, Chem. Eng. J. 171, 742-752. [CrossRef]
  • Repke J.-U., Hoffmann A., Ausner I., Villain O, Wozny G. (2006) On the track to understanding three phases in one tower, Distillation and Absorption, IChemE Symp. Series152, 190-199.
  • Rocha J.A., Bravo J.L., Fair J.R. (1996) Distillation columns containing structured packings: A comprehensive model for their performance. 2. Mass-transfer model, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 1660-1667. [CrossRef]
  • Scardovelli R., Zaleski S. (1999) Direct numerical simulation of free-surface and interfacial flow, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 567-603. [CrossRef]
  • Seibert F., Wilson I., Lewis C., Rochelle G. (2005) Effective Gas/Liquid Contact Area of Packing for CO2 absorption/stripping, Greenhouse Gas Control Technol. 2, 1925-1928. [CrossRef]
  • Spiegel L., Meier W. (1992) A generalized pressure drop model for structured packings, Distillation and Absorption, IChemE Symp. Series128, B85-B94.
  • Tobiesen F.A., Svendsen H., Juliussen O. (2007) Experimental validation of a rigorous absorber model for CO2 postcombustion capture, AIChE J. 53, 846-865. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.