Dossier: Challenges and New Approaches in EOR
Open Access
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 67, Number 6, November-December 2012
Dossier: Challenges and New Approaches in EOR
Page(s) 999 - 1018
Published online 06 February 2013
  • Alexander J. (1992) Nature and origin of a laterally extensive alluvial sandstone body in the Middle Jurassic Scalby Formation, J. Geol. Soc. London 149, 431-441. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barton M.D. (1994) Outcrop characterization of architecture and permeability structure in fluvial-deltaic sandstones, Cretaceous Ferron sandstone, Utah, PhD Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, Texas, 260 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Begg S.H., King P.R. (1985) Modeling the effect of shales on reservoir performance: Calculation of effective vertical permeability, SPE Paper 13529, 15 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Beucher H., Galli A., Le Loc’h G., Ravenne C., Heresim Group. (1993) Including a regional trend in reservoir modelling using the truncated Gaussian method, in Geostatistics Tróia ’92, Vol. 1, Soares A. (ed.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 555-566. [Google Scholar]
  • Birrell G.E., Putnam P.E. (2000) A study of the influence of reservoir architecture on SAGD steam chamber development at the underground test facility, northeaster Alberta, Canada, using a graphical analysis of temperature profiles, SPE Paper 2000-104, Canadian International Petroleum Conference (CIPC), Calgary, Canada, 8 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Cardwell W.T., Parsons R.L. (1945) Average permeabilities of heterogeneous oil sands, Trans. AIME 160, 34-42. [Google Scholar]
  • Chen Q., Gerristen M.G., Kovscek A.R. (2007) Effect of reservoir heterogeneities on the steam-assisted gravity drainage process, SPE ATCE 2007, Anaheim, CA, USA, 11-14 November. [Google Scholar]
  • Crerar E.E., Arnott R.W.C. (2007) Facies Distribution and Stratigraphic Architecture of the Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation, Lewis Property, Northeastern Alberta, Bull. Can. Pet. Geol. 55, 99-124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Doligez B., Beucher H., Geffroy F., Eschard R. (1999) Integrated reservoir characterization: improvement in heterogeneous stochastic modeling by integration of additional external constraints, in Reservoir Characterization Recent Advances, Schatzinger R., Jordan J. (eds), AAPG Memoir 71, 333-342. [Google Scholar]
  • Doligez B., Beucher H., Lerat O., Souza O. (2007) Use of a seismic derived constraint: Different steps and joined uncertainties in the construction of a realistic geological model, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 62, 2, 237-248. [Google Scholar]
  • Durlofsky L.J. (2003) Upscaling of Geocellular Models for Reservoir Flow Simulation: A Review of Recent Progress, Paper presented at 7th International Forum on Reservoir Simulation, Bühl/Baden-Baden, Germany, 23-27 June. [Google Scholar]
  • Eschard R., Houel P., Knox R., Ravenne C., Group HERESIM (1991) Three dimensional reservoir architecture of a valley-fill sequence and a deltaic aggradational sequence: influence of minor relative sea-level variations (Scalby Formation, England), SEPM Concept in Sedimentology and Paleontology 3, 133-147. [Google Scholar]
  • Eschard R., Doligez B., Beucher H. (2002) Using quantitative outcrop databases as a guide for geological reservoir modelling, in Geostatistics Rio 2000, Armstrong M. et al. (eds), Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 7-17. [Google Scholar]
  • Farouq-Ali S.M. (1997) Is there life after SAGD? J. Can. Pet. Technol. 36, 6, 20-23. [Google Scholar]
  • Flach P., Mossop G.D. (1985) Depositional Environments of Lower Cretaceous McMurray Formation, Athabasca Oil Sands, Alberta, AAPG Bull. 69, 1195-1207. [Google Scholar]
  • Galli A., Beucher H., LeLoc’h G., Doligez B. (1994) The pros and cons of the truncated Gaussian method, in Geostatistical Simulations, Armstrong M., Dowd P.A. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 217-233. [Google Scholar]
  • Galli A., Le Loc’h G., Geffroy F., Eschard R. (2006) An application of the truncated pluri-gaussian method for modeling geology, in Stochastic modeling and geostatistics: principles, methods and case studies, AAPG Computer Applications in Geology 5, 2, 109-122. [Google Scholar]
  • Hartkamp-Bakker C.A., Donselaar M.E. (1993) Permeability patterns in point bar deposits: Tertiary Loranca Basin, central Spain, in The geological modelling of hydrocarbon reservoirs and outcrop analogs, Flint S.S., Bryant I.D. (eds), Int. Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication, IAS SP15, 157-168. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson R.G. (1977) Preliminary evaluation of lithofacies models for meandering alluvial streams, in Fluvial sedimentology, Miall A.D. (ed.), Can. Soc. Pet. Geol. Memoir 5, 543-576. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson M.D., Muggeridge A.H. (2000) The effects of discontinuous shales on reservoir performance during horizontal waterflooding, SPE J. 5, 446-455. [Google Scholar]
  • Joseph P., Rabineau M., Eschard R., Benard F. (1995) Quantification from satellite imaging of the sedimentary body geometry and facies distribution in the Senegal valley, 17th Regional Meeting Sedimentology (IAS) / 5eCongrès Français de Sédimentologie (ASF), Aix-les-Bains, 24-26 avril, Publication ASF n° 22, p. 83. [Google Scholar]
  • Joshi S.D., Threlkeld C.B. (1985) Laboratory studies of thermally aided gravity drainage using horizontal wells, AOSTRA J. Res. 2, 1, 11-19. [Google Scholar]
  • Le Loch G., Galli A. (1996) Truncated plurigaussian method: theoritical and practical point of view, in Geostatistics Wollongong’ 96, Vol. 1, Baafi E.Y., Schofield N.A. (eds), Kluwer Academic Publisher, pp. 211-222. [Google Scholar]
  • Lemouzy P.M., Romeu R.K., Morelon I.F. (1993) A New Scaling-Up Method to Compute Relative Permeability and Capillary Pressure for Simulation of Heterogeneous Reservoirs, SPE Paper 26660, presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Houston, 3-6 October. [Google Scholar]
  • Lerat O., Adjemian F., Baroni A., Etienne G., Renard G., Bathellier E., Forgues E., Aubin F., Euzen T. (2010) Modelling of 4D Seismic Data for the Monitoring of the Steam Chamber Growth During SAGD Process, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 49, 6, 21-30. SPE-138401-PA. [Google Scholar]
  • Miall A.D. (1988) Reservoir heterogeneities in fluvial sandstones: Lessons from outcrop studies, AAPG Bull. 72, 6, 682-697. [Google Scholar]
  • Musial G., Reynaud J.Y., Gingras M.K., Féniès H., Labourdette R., Parize O. (2011) Subsurface and outcrop characterisation of large tidally influenced point bars of the Cretaceous Mc Murray Formation, Alberta, Canada, Accepted in Sedimentary Geology, April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Pemberton S.G., Flach P.D., Mossop G.D. (1982) Trace fossils from the Athabasca Oil Sands, Alberta, Canada, Science 217, 825-827. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Preux C. (2011) Study of evaluation criteria for reservoir upscaling, Paper presented at the 73rd EAGE Conference & Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2011, Vienna, Austria, 23-26 May. [Google Scholar]
  • Qi D., Hesketh T. (2004) Quantitative Evaluation of Information Loss in Reservoir Upscaling, Pet. Sci. Technol. 22, 11, 1625-1640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Renard P., de Marsily G. (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability: a review, Adv. Water Resour. 20, 5-6, 253-278. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Richardson J.G., Harris D.G., Rossen R.H., Van Hee G. (1978) The effect of small, discontinuous shales on oil recovery, J. Pet. Technol. 20, 1531-1537. [Google Scholar]
  • Robinson B., Kenny J., Hernandez-Hdez I.L., Bernal A., Chelak R. (2005) Geostatistical modeling integral to effective design and evaluation of SAGD processes of an Athabasca oilsands reservoir, a case study, SPE/PS-CIM/CHOA International Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, 1-3 November, SPE Paper 97743. [Google Scholar]
  • Sablok R., Aziz K. (2005) Upscaling and discretization errors in reservoir simulation, SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, Texas, USA, 31 January-2 February, SPE Paper 93372. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharp J.M., Mingjuan Shi, Galloway W.E. (2003) Heterogeneity of fluvial systems – control on density-driven flow and transport, Environ. Eng. Geosci. 9, 1, 5-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith D.G. (1988) Tidal bundles and mud couplets in the McMurray Formation, northeastern Alberta, Canada, Bull. Can. Pet. Geol. 36, 216-219. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith D.G., Hubbard S.M., Leckie D.A., Fustic M. (2009) Counter point bar deposits: lithofacies and reservoir significance in the meandering modern Peace River and ancient McMurray Formation, Alberta, Canada, Sedimentology 56, 1655-1669. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Swanson D.C. (1993) The importance of fluvial processes and related reservoir deposits, J. Pet. Technol. 45, 368-377. [Google Scholar]
  • Willis B.J. (1989) Palaeochannel reconstructions from point bar deposits: A three-dimensional perspective, Sedimentology 36, 757-766. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Willis B.J., White C.D. (2000) Quantitative outcrop data for flow simulation, J. Sediment. Res. 70, 4, 788-802. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Willis B.J., Tang H. (2010) Three-dimensional connectivity of point-bar deposits, J. Sediment. Res. 80, 440-454. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang G., Butler R.M. (1992) Effects of reservoir heterogeneities on heavy oil recovery by steam assisted gravity drainage, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 31, 8, 37-43. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang W., Youn S., Doan Q. (2005) Understanding reservoir architectures and steam chamber growth at Christina Lake, Alberta, by using 4D seismic and Croswell seismis imaging, SPE 97808, November. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang W., Youn S., Doan Q. (2007) Understanding reservoir architectures and steam-chamber growth at Christina Lake, Alberta, by using 4D seismic and crosswell seismic imaging, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 10, 5, 446-452. SPE-97808-PA. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.