Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 67, Number 3, May-June 2012
Page(s) 435 - 449
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2011117
Published online 03 May 2012
  • Ouyang L., Aziz K. (1996) Steady-State Gas Flow in Pipes, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 14, 137-158. [CrossRef]
  • Osiadacz A.J., Chaczykowski M. (2001) Comparison of Isothermal and Non-Isothermal Pipeline Gas Flow Models, Chem. Eng. J. 81, 41-50. [CrossRef]
  • Zhou J., Adewumi M.A. (1995) Simulation of Transient Flow in Natural Gas Pipeline, 27th Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Aluquerque, New Mexico, October 18-20.
  • Ke S.L., Ti H.C. (2000) Transient analysis of isothermal gas flow in pipeline network, Chem. Eng. J. 76, 169-177. [CrossRef]
  • Fauer D. (2002) The Making of A Useful Pipeline Simulation Model, 34th Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Portland, Oregon, October 23-25.
  • Abbaspour M., Chapman K.S. (2008) Non-isothermal Transient Flow in Natural Gas Pipeline, J. Appl. Mech. 75, 031018. [CrossRef]
  • Chaczykowski M. (2009) Transient flow in natural gas pipeline- The effect of pipeline thermal model, App. Math. Modell, doi :10.1016/j.apm.2009.07.017.
  • Rhoads G.A. (1983) Which Flow Equation- Does it Matter? 15th Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Detroit, Michigan, October 27-28.
  • Schroeder D.W. (2001) A Tutorial on Pipe Flow Equations, 33rd Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Salt Lake City, Utah, October 17-19.
  • Menon E.S. (2005) Gas Pipeline Hydraulics, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Stanley R.A., Bohannan W.R. (1977) Dynamic Simulation of Centrifugal Compressor Systems, Proceedings of the sixth Turbomachinery Symposium, Texas A&M University, pp. 123-131.
  • Botros K.K., Campbell P.J., Mah D.B. (1989) Dynamic Simulation of Compressor Station Installations Including Control Systems, 21st Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), EI Paso, Texas, October 19-20.
  • Botros K.K. (1994) Transient Phenomena in Compressor Stations during Surge, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 116, 133-142. [CrossRef]
  • Herran-Gonzalez A. et al. (2008) Modeling and Simulation of a Gas Distribution Pipeline Network, Appl. Math. Modell. doi :10.1016/j.apm.2008.02.012.
  • Edalat M., Ali Mansoori G. (1988) Buried Gas Transmission Pipelines : Temperature Profile Prediction through the Corresponding States Principle, Energy Sources 10, 247-252. [CrossRef]
  • Abdolahi F., Mesbah A., Boozarjomehry R.B., Svrcek W.Y. (2007) The Effect of Major Parameters on Simulation Results of Gas Pipelines, Int. J. Mech. Sci. 49, 989-1000. [CrossRef]
  • Eckert E.R.G., Drake R.M. (1972) Analysis of Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw − Hill, New York.
  • Haaland S.E. (1981) Simple and Explicit Formula for the Friction Factor in Turbulent Pipe Flow including Natural Gas Pipelines, IFAG B-131, Div Areo and Gas Dynamics, The Norwegian Institution of Technology.
  • Cengel Y.A. (2002) Thermodynamics : An Engineering Approach, McGrawHill.
  • Ehrhardt K., Steinbach M.C. (2003) Nonlinear Optimization in Gas Networks, ZIB-Report 03-46, December.
  • Bales P., Geibler B., Kolb O., Lang J., Martin A., Morsi A. (2008) Comparison of Nonlinear and Linear Optimization of Transient Gas Networks, Darmstadt university of Technology, Department of Mathematics, Preprint No. 2552.
  • Mohring J., Hoffmann J., Halfmann T., Zemitis A., Basso G. (2004) Automated Model Reduction of Complex Gas Pipeline Networks, 36th Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Palm Springs, California, October 20-22.
  • Modisette J.L. (2000) Equation of State Tutorial, 32nd Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Savannah, Georgia, October 28-30.
  • Kunz O., Klimeck R., Wanger W., Jaeschke M. (2007) The GERG-2004 wide-range equation of state for natural gases and other mixtures, Verlag des Vereins Deutcher Ingenieure, Germany.
  • Hall K.R., Yaborough L. (1973) A New Equation of State for ZFactor Calculations, Oil Gas J. 82-85, 90, 92.
  • Dranchuk P.M., Purvis R.A., Robinson D.B. (1974) Computer calculations of natural gas compressibility factors using the Standing and Katz Correlation, Institute of Petroleum Technical Series IP 74-008, 1-13.
  • Dranchuk P.M., Abou-Kassem J.H. (1975) Calculation of Z Factors For Natural Gases Using Equations of State, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 14, 34-36.
  • Chaczykowski M. (2009) Sensitivity of pipeline gas flow model to the selection of the equation of state, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 87, 12, 1596-1603. [CrossRef]
  • Odom F.M. (1990) Tutorial on Modeling of Gas Turbine Driven Centrifugal Compressors, 22nd Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Baltimore, Maryland, October 18-19.
  • Percell P.B., Ryan M.J. (1987) Steady-State Optimization of Gas Pipeline Network Operation, 19th Annual Meeting Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Tulsa, Oklahoma, October 22-23.
  • Ransom D.L., Brun K., Kurz R. (2006) Enthalpy Determination Methods for Compressor Performance Calculations, Proceedings of PSIG The 38th Annual Meeting, PSIG 06A2, Williamsburg, VA.
  • Cohen H., Rogers G.F.C., Saravanamuttoo H.I.H. (1987) Gas Turbine Theory, Longman scientific and Technical, Wiley, 3rd edition.
  • Kurz R., Ohanian S. (2003) Modeling Turbomachinery in Pipeline Simulations, 35th Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Switzerland, October 15-17.
  • Santos S.P.D. (1997) Transient Analysis a Must in Gas Pipeline Design, 29th Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Tucson, October 15-17.
  • Walsh P.P., Fletcher P. (2004) Gas Turbine Performance, Blackwell science.
  • Kurz R., Brun K. (2009) Degradation of Gas Turbine Performance in Natural Gas Service, J. Natural Gas Sci. Eng. 1, 95-102. [CrossRef]
  • Zhang N., Cai R. (2002) Analytical solutions and typical characteristics of part-load performance of single shaft gas turbine and its cogeneration, Energ. Convers. Manage. 43, 9-12, 1323-1337.
  • Ohanian S., Kurz R. (2003) Transient Simulation of the Effects of Compressor Outage, 35th Annual Meeting, Pipeline Simulation Interest Group (PSIG), Switzerland, October 15-17.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.