Dossier: Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration and Hydrocarbon Production
Open Access
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 67, Number 2, March-April 2012
Dossier: Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration and Hydrocarbon Production
Page(s) 207 - 220
Published online 23 April 2012
  • Aanonsen S.I., Aavastamark I., Barkve T., Cominelli A., Gonard R., Gosselin O., Kolasinski M., Rene H. (2003) Effect of scale dependent data correlations in an integrated history matching loop combining production data and 4D seismic data, SPE 79665, SPE RSS, Houston, TX, USA.
  • Arenas E., Van Kruijsdijk C., Oldenziel T. (2001) Semi-automatic history matching using the pilot point method including time-lapse seismic data, SPE 71634, SPE ATCE, New Orleans, LA, USA, 30 September-3 October.
  • Aziz K., Settari A. (1979) Petroleum reservoir simulation, Applied Science Publishers.
  • Caers J. (2003) Geostatistical history matching under training-image based geological constraints, SPE J. 8, 3, 218-226.
  • Castro S., Caers J., Durlofsky L. (2006) Improved modeling of 4D seismic response using flow-based downscaling of coarse grid saturations, 10th ECMOR, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, A024.
  • Chilès J.P., Delfiner P. (1999) Geostatistics : Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, Wiley, New York, 695 p.
  • Doligez B., Beucher H., Lerat O., Souza O. (2007) Use of a Seismic Derived Constraint : Different Steps and Joined Uncertainties in the Construction of a Realistic Geological Model, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 62, 2, 237-248. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [OGST]
  • Dutton S.P., Flers W.A., Barton M.D. (2003) Reservoir characterization of a Permian deep-water sandstone, East Ford Field, Delaware Basin, Texas, AAPG Bull. 87, 609-627. [CrossRef]
  • Eaton T.T. (2006) On the importance of geological heterogeneity for flow simulation, Sediment. Geol. 184, 3-4, 187-201. [CrossRef]
  • Enchery G., Le Ravalec-Dupin M., Roggero F. (2007) An improved pressure and saturation downscaling process for a better integration of 4D seismic data together with production history, SPE 107088, SPE Europec/EAGE, London, UK, 11-14 June.
  • Fornel A., Mezghani M., Langlais V. (2007) Using production data and time domain seismic attributes for history matching, in Special Rock physics and geomechanics in the study of reservoirs and repositories, David C. and Le Ravalec-Dupin M. (eds), Publication Series of the Geological Society of London 284, 147-159.
  • Gassmann F. (1951) Uber die elastizitat poroser Medien, Vier. Der Natur Gesellschaft 96, 1-23.
  • Gervais V., Gautier Y., Le Ravalec M., Roggero F. (2007) History matching using local gradual deformation, SPE/EUROPEC, London, UK, 11-14 June, SPE 107173.
  • Gervais V., Roggero F. (2010) Integration of 4D seismic data in a history matching process using an efficient local parameterization, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 73, 1-2, 86-98. DOI : 10.1016/j.petrol2010.05.010.
  • Gervais V., Roggero F., Feraille M., Le Ravalec M., Seiler A. (2010) Joint history matching of prediction and 4D-seismic related data for a North Sea field case, SPE 135116, SPE ATCE, Florence, Italy, 19-22 September.
  • Goovaerts P. (1997) Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation, Oxford Press, New York, 483 p.
  • Gosselin O., Van De Berg S., Cominelli A. (2001) Integrated history matching of production and seismic data, SPE ATCE, New Orleans, LA, USA.
  • Hoffman B., Caers J. (2005) Regional probability perturbations for history matching, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 46, 53-71. [CrossRef]
  • Hu L.-Y. (2000) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of Gaussian-related stochastic models, Math. Geol. 32, 1, 87-108. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Hu L.-Y., Blanc G., Noetinger B. (2001) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of sequential stochastic simulations, Math. Geol. 33, 4, 475-489. DOI :10.1023/A :1011088913233. [CrossRef]
  • Hu L.-Y., Jenni S. (2005) History-matching of object based stochastic reservoir models, SPE J. 10, 3, SPE 81503.
  • Hu L.-Y., Le Ravalec-Dupin M. (2004) Elements for an integrated geostatistical modeling of heterogeneous reservoirs, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 59, 2, 141-155. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Jacquard P., Jaïn C. (1965) Permeability distribution from fluid pressure data, SPE J. 5, 4, 281-294.
  • Journel A.G., Gundeso R., Gringarten E., Yao T. (1998) Stochastic modelling of a fluvial reservoir : a comparative review of algorithms, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 21, 95-121. [CrossRef]
  • Kawar R., Calvert R., Khan M. (2003) The work flow of 4D seismic, SPE 81527, SPE 13th Middel Oil Show & Conference.
  • Landa, J., Horne R. (1997) A procedure to integrate well test data, reservoir performance history and 4D seismic information into a reservoir description, SPE 38653, SPE ATCE, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Le Ravalec-Dupin M. (2005) Inverse stochastic modeling of flow in porous media – Application to reservoir characterization, Editions Technip, ISBN 2-7108-0864-1.
  • Le Ravalec-Dupin M. (2010) Pilot block method methodology to calibrate stochastic permeability fields to dynamic data, Math. Geosc. 42, 2, 165-185. DOI : 10.1007/s11004-009-9249-x. [CrossRef]
  • Le Ravalec-Dupin M., Coureaud B., Nicolas L., Roggero F. (2004) Conditioning an underground gas storage site to well pressures, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 59, 6, 611-624. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Le Ravalec-Dupin M., Da Veiga S. (2011) Cosimulation as a perturbation method for calibrating porosity and permeability fields to dynamic data, Comput. Geosci., DOI :10.1016/j.cageo.2010.10.013.
  • Le Ravalec-Dupin M., Fenwick D. (2002) A combined geostatistical and streamline-based history matching procedure, SPE ATCE, SPE 77378, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Nelson R.W. (1960) In place measurement of permeability in heterogeneous media, 1. Theory of a proposed method, J. Geophys. Res. 65, 6, 1753-1760. [CrossRef]
  • Neuman S.P. (1973) Calibration of distributed parameter groundwater flow models viewed as a multi-objective decision process under uncertainty, Water Resour. Res. 9, 4, 1006-1021. [CrossRef]
  • Oliver D., Reynolds A., Liu N. (2008) Inverse theory for petroleum reservoir characterization and history matching, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Peters E., Arts R.J., Brouwer G.K., Geel C.R. (2009) Results of the Brugge benchmark study for flooding optimization and history matching, SPE 119094, SPE RSS, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 2-4 February.
  • Pianelo L., Guérillot D., Gallouet T. (2000) Coupled inversion of permeability and acoustic impedance : An outstanding data integration, 7th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, M16, Baveno, Italy.
  • Ponsot-Jacquin C., Roggero F., Enchéry G. (2009) Calibration of facies proportions through a history-matching process, B. Soc. Geol. Fr. 180, 5, 387-397. [CrossRef]
  • Pourpak H., Bourbiaux B., Roggero F., Delay F. (2009) An integrated methodology for calibrating a heterogeneous/fractured reservoir model from wellbore flow measurements : Case study, SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 12, 3, 433-445.
  • RamaRao B.S., Lavenue A.M., de Marsily G., Marietta M.G. (1995) Pilot point methodology for automated calibration of an ensemble of conditionally simulated transmissivity fields. Part 1. Theory and computational experiments, Water Resour. Res. 31, 3, 475-493. [CrossRef]
  • Renard P., de Marsily G. (1997) Calculating equivalent permeability : a review, Adv. Water Resour. 20, 5-6, 253-278. [CrossRef]
  • Roggero F., Ding D.Y., Berthet P., Lerat O., Cap J., Schreiber P.E. (2007) Matching of production history and 4D seismic data – Application to the Girassol field, offshore Angola, SPE ATCE, Anaheim, CA, USA, SPE 109929.
  • Salles T., Lopez S., Cacas M.C., Mulder T. (2007) Cellular automata model of density currents, Geomorphology 88, 1-2, 1-20. [CrossRef]
  • Soltani A., Le Ravalec-Dupin M., Fourar M., Rosenberg E. (2010) Three-dimensional characterization of permeability at the core scale, Transport Porous Med. 84, 2, 285-305, DOI : 10.1007/s11242-009- 9501-3. [CrossRef]
  • Stephen K., MacBeth C. (2006) Seismic history matching in the Schiehallion UKCS field, First Break 24, 43-49.
  • Strebelle S. (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics, Math. Geol. 34, 1-22. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Sun N.-Z. (1995) Inverse Problems in Groundwater Modeling, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 337 p.
  • Tarantola A. (1987) Inverse Problem Theory – Methods for Data Fitting and Model Parameter Estimation, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 613 p.
  • Tillier E., Enchery G., Le Ravalec M., Gervais V. (2010) Local and continuous updating of facies proportions for history-matching, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 73, 3-4, 194-203. DOI : 10.1016/j.petrol2010.05.014. [CrossRef]
  • Tillier E., Le Ravalec M., Roggero F. (2010) Using time domain seismic data for history matching processes, EAGE, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Tychonoff A.N., Arsenin V.Y. (1977) Solution of Ill-posed Problems, Winston & Sons, Washington. Waggoner J., Cominelli A., Seymour R. (2002) Improved reservoir modeling with time-lapse seismic in a Gulf of Mexico gas condensate reservoir, SPE 77514, SPE ATCE, San Antonio, TX, USA.
  • Yeh W.W.G. (1986) Review of parameter identification procedures in groundwater hydrology : The inverse problem, Water Resour. Res. 22, 95-108. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.