ogst
Home All issues Volume 66 / No 1 (January-February 2011) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 66 1 (2011) 81-92 References
IFP Energies nouvelles International Conference: Deep Saline Aquifers for Geological Storage of CO2 and Energy
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 66, Number 1, January-February 2011
IFP Energies nouvelles International Conference: Deep Saline Aquifers for Geological Storage of CO2 and Energy
Page(s) 81 - 92
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2011004
Published online 18 March 2011
  • Chadwick A., Arts R., Bernstone C., May F., Thibeau S., Zweigel P. (eds) (2008) Best practice for the storage of CO2 in saline aquifers, Observations and guidelines from the SACS and CO2STORE projects, Keyworth, Nottingham, BGS Occasional Publication No. 14. [Google Scholar]
  • van der Meer L.G.H., Egberts P.J.P. (2008) A General Method for Calculating Subsurface CO2 Storage Capacity, OTC paper 19309, presented at the OTC conference held in Houston, Texas, USA, May 5-8. [Google Scholar]
  • IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 442 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Bachu S., Adams J.J. (2003) Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: Capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO2 in solution, Energ. Convers. Manage. 44, 20, 3151-3175. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradshaw J., Allinson G., Bradshaw B.E., Nguyen V., Rigg A.J., Spencer L., Wilson P. (2003) Australia’s CO2 geological storage potential and matching of missions sources to potential sinks, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-6), Gale J., Kaya Y. (eds), Kyoto, Japan, October 1-4, 2002, Pergamon, Vol. I, pp. 633-638. [Google Scholar]
  • NETL DOE Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • NETL DOE Carbon Sequestration Atlas of the United States and Canada, second edition, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • Holloway S. (ed.) (1996) The underground disposal of carbon dioxide, Final report of Joule 2, Project No. CT92-0031, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK, 355 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Larsen M., Christensen N.P., Reidulv B., Bonijoly D., Dusar M., Hatziyannis G., Hendriks C., Holloway S., May F., Wildenborg A. (2005) Assessing European potential for geological storage of CO2 - the GESTCO project, Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT7), Vancouver, Canada, September 5-9, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • Bøe R., Magnus C., Osmundsen P.T., Rindstad B.I. (2002) CO2 point sources and subsurface storage capacities for CO2 in aquifers in Norway, NGU Report 2002.010. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradshaw J., Bachu S., Bonijoly D., Burruss R., Holloway S., Christensen N.P., Mathiassen O.M. (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: Issues and development of standards, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 62-68. [Google Scholar]
  • Bachu S., Bonijoly D., Bradshaw J., Burruss R., Holloway S., Christensen N.P., Mathiassen O.M. (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: Methodology and gaps, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 1, 430-443. [Google Scholar]
  • Bachu S. (2008) CO2 storage in geological media: Role, means, status and barriers to deployment, Prog. Energ. Combust. 34, 254-273. [Google Scholar]
  • Gorecki C. et al. (2009) Development of CO2 storage coefficients for carbon dioxide storage in deep saline formations, IEA-GHG Technical Study, Report 2009/13. [Google Scholar]
  • Newman G.H. (1973) Pore-Volume Compressibility of Consolidated, Friable, and Unconsolidated Reservoir Rocks Under Hydrostatic Loading, SPE paper 3835, J. Petrol. Technol. 129-134, Feb. [Google Scholar]
  • Chiquet P., Daridon J.L., Broseta D., Thibeau S. (2007) CO2/water interfacial tensions under pressure and temperature conditions of CO2 geological storage, Energ. Convers. Manage. 48, 736-744. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Springer N., Lindgren H. (2006) Caprock properties of the Nordland Shale recovered from the 15/9-A11 well, the Sleipner area, Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-8) Conference, Trondheim, Norway, June 2006, Paper 6p and abstract 3p on CD-ROM. [Google Scholar]
  • Springer N., personal communication. [Google Scholar]
  • Lindeberg E., Vuillaume J.-F., Ghaderi A. (2009) Determination of the CO2 storage capacity of the Utsira formation, Energy Procedia 1, 2777-2784. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • van der Meer L.G., van Wees J.D. (2006) Limitations to storage pressure in finite saline aquifers and the effect of CO2 solubility on storage pressure, SPE paper 103342, presented at SPE ATCE held, San Antonio, Texas, USA, 24-27 September, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • Ennis-King J., Paterson L. (2003) Role of convective mixing in the long-term storage of carbon dioxide in deep saline formations, SPE paper 84344 presented at SPE ATCE, Denver, Colorado, USA, 5-8 october, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • Nicot J.P. (2008) Evaluation of large-scale CO2 storage on freshwater sections of aquifers: An example from the Texas Gulf Coast Basin, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 582-593. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Birkholzer J., Zhou Q., Tsang C.F. (2009) Large-scale impact Control 3, 181-194. [Google Scholar]
  • Holloway S., Noy D., Chadwick A. (2009) Modelling largescale CO2 storage in a saline water-bearing reservoir in the UK sector of the southern North Sea, Keynote address at the International Conference on deep saline aquifers for geological storage of CO2 and energy, IFP, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 27-29 May. [Google Scholar]
  • Yang Q. et al. (2008) Dynamic modelling of CO2 injection in a closed saline aquifer in the Browse Basin, Western Australia, SPE 115236. [Google Scholar]
  • Flett M. et al. (2008) Gorgon Project: Subsurface Evaluation of Carbon dioxide disposal under Barrow Island, SPE 116372. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.