ogst
Home All issues Volume 75 (2020) Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 75 (2020) 5 References
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 75, 2020
Article Number 5
Number of page(s) 14
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2019069
Published online 24 January 2020
  • British Petroleum BP statistical review of world energy statistical review of world, Ed. BP Stat. Rev. World Energy 1–69. [Google Scholar]
  • Sheng J.J. (2013) Enhanced oil recovery field case studies, Gulf Professional Publishing, 712 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Lake L.W. (1991) Enhanced oil recovery, Facsimile (ed), Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs. [Google Scholar]
  • Taber J.J., Martin F.D., Seright R.S. (1997) EOR screening criteria revisited – Part 1: Introduction to screening criteria and enhanced recovery field projects, SPE Reserv. Eng. 12, 3, 189–198. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shandrygin A., Lutfullin A. (2008) Current status of enhanced recovery techniques in the fields of Russia, SPE Annu. Tech. Conf. Exhib., 1–24 September, Denver, Colorado, USA, pp. 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  • Healy R.N., Reed R.L. (1974) Physicochemical aspects of microemulsion flooding, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 14, 5, 491–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stoll W.M., Al-Harthy S.A.A., Van Wunnik J., Faber M.J. (2011) Alkaline/surfactant/polymer flood: From the laboratory to the field, SPE Reserv. Eng. 14, 6, 702–712. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Batenburg D.W., Berg S., Oedai S., Elewaut K. (2015) Visualization of oil mobilization in ASP core floods using X-ray CT imaging, SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference, 11–14 October, Mishref, Kuwait. [Google Scholar]
  • London M., Cameron S.M., Donald J., Wassmuth F.R. (2014) Waterflooding experiments with X-ray CT imaging, SPE Heavy Oil Conference-Canada, 10–12 June, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  • Hove A., Nilsen V., Leknes J. (1990) Visualization of xanthan flood behavior in core samples by means of X-ray tomography, SPE Reserv. Eng. 5, 4, 475–480. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hunt P.K., Engler P., Bajsarowicz C. (1988) Computed tomography as a core analysis tool: Applications, instrument evaluation, and image improvement techniques, J. Pet. Technol. 40, 9, 1203–1210. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang S., Ayral S., Gryte C. (1984) Computer-assisted tomography for the observation of oil displacement in porous media, Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 24, 1, 53–55. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wellington S.L., Vinegar H.J. (1987) X-ray computerized tomography, J. Pet. Technol. 39, 8, 885–898. [Google Scholar]
  • Vinegar H.J., Wellington S.L. (1987) Tomographic imaging of three-phase flow experiments, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 58, 1, 96–107. [Google Scholar]
  • Withjack E.M. (1988) Computed tomography for rock-property determination and fluid-flow visualization, SPE Form. Eval. 3, 696–704. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Withjack E.M., Devier C., Michael G. (2003) The role of X-ray computer tomography in core analysis, SPE West. Reg. Pacific Sect. Jt. Meet., 19–24 May, Long Beach, CA, USA, pp. 12. No. SPE Paper #83467. [Google Scholar]
  • Wan T., Yang S., Wang L., Sun L. (2019) Experimental investigation of two-phase relative permeability of gas and water for tight gas carbonate under different test conditions, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74, 23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ouali C., Rosenberg E., Barré L., Bourbiaux B. (2019) A CT-scanner study of foam dynamics in porous media, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 74, 33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alvestad J., Gilje E., Hove A.O., Langeland O., Maldal T., Schilling B.E.R. (1992) Coreflood experiments with surfactant systems for IOR: Computer tomography studies and numerical modelling, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 7, 1–2, 155–171. [Google Scholar]
  • Coles M.E., Muegge E.L., Auzerais F., Frulla P., Kantzas A. (1995) The use of attenuation standards for CT scanning, SCA Conference. [Google Scholar]
  • Hicks P.J. (1996) X-ray computer-assisted tomography for laboratory core studies, J. Pet. Technol. 48, 12, 1120–1122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma B.C., Brihgam W.E., Castainer L.M. (1997) CT imaging techniques for two-phase and three-phase in-situ saturation measurements, Tulsa. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chakravarthy D., Muralidharan V., Putra E., Schechter D.S. (2004) Application of X-ray CT for investigation of CO2 and WAG injection in fractured reservoirs, Petroleum Society’s 5th Canadian International Petroleum Conference, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg S., Oedai S., Landman A.J., Brussee N., Boele M., Valdez R., van Gelder K. (2010) Miscible displacement of oils by carbon disulfide in porous media: Experiments and analysis, Phys. Fluids 22, 11, 113102. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berg C.F., Lopez O., Berland H. (2017) Industrial applications of digital rock technology, J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 157, 131–147. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg S., Ott H. (2012) Stability of CO2 – Brine immiscible displacement, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 11, 188–203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Carcoana A.N. (1982) Enhanced oil recovery in Rumania, SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Symposium, 4–7 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma. SPE-10699-MS. [Google Scholar]
  • Goodlett G., Honarpour M.M., Chung F.T. (1986) The role of screening and laboratory flow studies in EOR process evaluation, SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, 19–21 May, Billings, Montana, pp. 28. [Google Scholar]
  • Brashear J.P., Kuuskraa V.A. (1995) The potential and economics of enhanced oil recovery, J. Pet. Technol. 30, 9, 1231–1239. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Bahar M.A., Merrill R., Peake W., Jumaa M., Oskui R. (2004) Evaluation of IOR potential within Kuwait, Abu Dhabi International Conference and Exhibition, 10–13 October, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. [Google Scholar]
  • Ezekwe N. (2011) Petroleum reservoir engineering practice, Pearson Education Inc., Boston. [Google Scholar]
  • Sheng J.J. (2015) Status of surfactant EOR technology. Petroleum 1, 2, 97–105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Suarez A.F., Gaviria W., Pavas J., Frorup M.D. (2005) Beating the marginal well performance in a mature field: San Francisco Field in Colombia, SPE Lat. Am. Caribb. Pet. Eng. Conf., 20–23 June, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. [Google Scholar]
  • Claes S., Nader F.H., Youssef S. (2018) Coupled experimental/numerical workflow for assessing quantitative diagenesis and dynamic porosity/permeability evolution in calcite-cemented sandstone reservoir rocks, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 73, 36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • De Melo M., Lucas E. (2008) Characterization and selection of polymers for future research on enhanced oil recovery, Chem. Chem. Technol. 2, 4, 295–303. [Google Scholar]
  • Sanabria F.C.B. (2013) Avaliação da injeção de surfactantes como método de recuperação avançada em reservatórios de arenito, São Paulo. [Google Scholar]
  • API (1990) Recommended practices for evaluation of polymers used in enhanced oil recovery operations, Washington, p. 86. [Google Scholar]
  • Tapias Hernández F.A., Moreno R.B.Z.L. (2019) Assessment of a surfactant-polymer formulation applied to the conditions of one, CT & F – Ciencia Tecnol. y Futur. 9, 47–63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dos Santos R.L.A., Bedrikovetsky P., Holleben C.R. (1997) Optimal Design and Planning for Laboratory Corefloods, Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, 30 August–3 September, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. SPE 39038. [Google Scholar]
  • Bonilla Sanabria F.C., Moreno R.B.Z.L. (2013) Surfactant flooding evaluation for enhanced oil recovery in sandstones reservoirs, European Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery. [Google Scholar]
  • Berg S., Oedai S., Ott H. (2013) Displacement and mass transfer between saturated and unsaturated CO2-brine systems in sandstone, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 12, 478–492. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.