ogst
Home All issues Volume 73 (2018) Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles, 73 (2018) 42 References
Open Access
Issue
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 73, 2018
Article Number 42
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2018041
Published online 16 October 2018
  • Abedini A., Torabi F. (2014) On the CO2 storage potential of cyclic CO2 injection process for enhanced oil recovery, Fuel 124, 14–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ampomah W., Balch R., Cather M. (2016) Evaluation of CO2 storage mechanisms in CO2 enhanced oil recovery sites: application to Morrow sandstone reservoir, Energ. Fuel. 30, 10, 8545–8555. [Google Scholar]
  • Azzolina N.A., Nakles D.V., Gorecki C.D. (2015) CO2 storage associated with CO2 enhanced oil recovery: A statistical analysis of historical operations, Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con. 37, 384–397. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bachu S., Shaw J. (2003) Evaluation of the CO2 sequestration capacity in Alberta’s oil and gas reservoirs at depletion and the effect of underlying aquifers, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 42, 9, 51–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bachu S., Bradshaw J., Bonijoly D., Burruss R., Holloway S., Christensen N.P., Mathiassen O.M. (2007) CO2 storage capacity estimation: issues and development of standards, Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con. 1, 62–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cao M., Gu Y. (2013) Physicochemical characterization of produced oils and gases in immiscible and miscible CO2 flooding processes, Energ. Fuel. 27, 1, 440–453. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Christensen J.R., Stenby E.H., Skauge A. (2001) Review of WAG field experience, SPE Reservoir Eval. Eng. 4, 97–106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • DOE. (2010). An assessment of gate-to-gate environmental life cycle performance of water-alternating-gas CO2-enhanced oil recovery in the Permian Basin, National Energy Technology Laboratory, DOE/NETL-2010/1433, 30, September. [Google Scholar]
  • Jahangiri H.R., Zhang D. (2010) Optimization of carbon dioxide sequestration and enhanced oil recovery in oil reservoir, SPE Western Regional Meeting, 27–29 August, Anaheim, California, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Kamali F., Cinar Y. (2014) Co-optimizing enhanced oil recovery and CO2 storage by imultaneous water and CO2 injection, Energ. Explor. Exploit. 32, 2, 281–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kovscek A.R., Cakici M.D. (2005) Geologic storage of carbon dioxide and enhanced oil recovery. II. Cooptimization of storage and recovery, Energy Convers. Manage. 46, 1941–1956. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liang Z., Li X., Ren B., Cui G.D., Zhang Y., Ren S.R., Chen G.L., Zhang H. (2016) CO2 storage potential and trapping mechanisms in the H-59 block of Jilin oilfield China, Int. J. Greenh. Gas. Con. 49, 267–280. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu P.C., Zhang X., Hao M.Q., Liu J.Q., Yuan Z. (2016) Parameter optimization of gas alternative water for CO2 flooding in low permeability hydrocarbon reservoirs, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy. 8, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • Lv G.Z., Li Q., Wang S.J., Li X.Y. (2015) Key techniques of reservoir engineering and injection-production process for CO2 flooding in China’s SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield. J. CO2 Utilization 11, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  • Ma J.H., Wang X.Z., Gao R.M., Zeng F.H., Huang C.X., Tontiwachwuthikul P., Liang Z.W. (2015) Enhanced light oil recovery from tight formations through CO2 huff “n” puff processes, Fuel 154, 35–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Murray M.D., Frailey S.M., Lawal A.S. (2001) New approach to CO2 flood: soak alternating gas, SPE Permian Basin Oil and Gas Recovery Conference, 15–17 May, Midland, Texas. [Google Scholar]
  • Rahimi V., Bidarigh M., Bahrami P. (2017) Experimental study and performance investigation of miscible water-alternating-CO2 flooding for enhancing oil recovery in the Sarvak formation, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 72, 35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shen P.P., Liao X.W., Liu Q.J. (2009) Methodology for estimation of CO2 storage capacity in reservoirs, Petrol. Explor. Dev. 36, 2, 216–220. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Song C.Y., Yang D.Y. (2017) Experimental and numerical evaluation of CO2 huff-n-puff processes in Bakken formation, Fuel. 190, 145–162. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sun L.L., Dou H.E., Li Z.P., Hu Y.L., Hao X.N. (2017) Assessment of CO2 storage potential and carbon capture utilization and storage prospect in China, J. Energy Institute 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Torabi F., Asghari K. (2010) Effect of connate water saturation oil viscosity and matrix permeability on rate of gravity drainage during immiscible and miscible displacement tests in matrix-fracture experimental model, J. Can. Petrol. Technol. 49, 61–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang Z., Ma J., Gao R., Zeng F., Huang C., Tontiwachwuthikul P., Liang Z. (2013) Optimizing cyclic CO2 injection for low-permeability oil reservoirs through experimental study, SPE Unconventional Resources Conference, 5–7 November, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. [Google Scholar]
  • Wolcott J., Schenewerk P., Berzins T., Karim F. (1995) A parametric investigation of the cyclic CO2 injection process, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 141, 35–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu X.G., Saeedi A. (2017) Evaluation and Optimization Study on a Hybrid EOR Technique Named as Chemical-Alternating-Foam Floods, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles 72, 1. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu W., Lashgari H.R., Wu K., Sepehrnoori K. (2015) CO2 injection for enhanced oil recovery in Bakken tight oil reservoirs, Fuel 159, 354–363. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.