Dossier: Characterization of European CO2 Storage – European Project SiteChar
Open Access
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 70, Number 4, July–August 2015
Dossier: Characterization of European CO2 Storage – European Project SiteChar
Page(s) 599 - 613
Published online 14 October 2014
  • Anderson E.M. (1951) Dynamics of Faulting and Dike Formation with Application in Britain, 2nd ed., Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 206 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Arts R.J., Jones D.G., Chadwick R.A., Klinkby L., Bernstone C., Sørensen A.T. (2011) Development of a monitoring plan for the Vedsted structure in Denmark, Energy Procedia 4, 3558–3565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bell F.G. (1977) A note on the physical properties of chalk, Engineering Geology 11, 217–225. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bergmo P.E.S., Grimstad A.A., Lindeberg E. (2011) Simultaneous CO2 injection and water production to optimize aquifer storage capacity, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 5, 555–564. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Britze P., Japsen P. (1991) Geological map of Denmark 1:400,000. The Danish Basin. “Top Zechstein” of the Triassic (two-way traveltime and depth, thickness and interval velocity). Geological Survey of Denmark Map Series 31. 4 maps and 4 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Buscheck T.A., Sun Y., Chen M., Hao Y., Wolery T.J., Bourcier W.L., Tompson A.F. (2012) Active CO2 reservoir management for carbon storage: Analysis of operational strategies to relieve pressure buildup and improve injectivity, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 6, 230–245. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Court B., Bandilla K.W., Celia M.A., Buscheck T.A., Nordbotten J.M., Dobossy M. (2012) Initial evaluation of advantageous synergies associated with simultaneous brine production and CO2 geological sequestration, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 8, 90–100. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dalhoff F., Klinkby L., Sørensen A.T., Bernstone C., Frykman P., Andersen C., Christensen N.P. (2011) CCS demo Denmark: The Vedsted case, Energy Procedia 4, 4704–4710. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frykman P., Bech N., Sørensen A.T., Nielsen L.H., Nielsen C.M., Kristensen L., Bidstrup T. (2009) Geological modeling and dynamic flow analysis as initial site investigation for large-scale CO2 injection at the Vedsted structure, NW Denmark, Energy Procedia 1, 1, 2975–2982. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frykman P., Nielsen C.M., Dalhoff F., Sørensen A.T., Klinkby L., Nielsen L.H. (2011) Geological modelling for site evaluation at the Vedsted structure, NW Denmark, Energy Procedia 4, 4711–4718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heidbach O., Tingay M., Barth A., Reinecker J., Kurfeß D., Müller B. (2008). The World Stress Map database release 2008. doi:10.1594/GFZ.WSM.Rel2008 [Google Scholar]
  • Itasca (2012) FLAC3D – Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions. User’s Manual. [Google Scholar]
  • Klinkby L., Nielsen C.M., Krogh E., Smith I.E., Palm B., Bernstone C. (2011) Simulating rapidly fluctuating CO2 flow into the Vedsted CO2 pipeline, injection well and reservoir, Energy Procedia 4, 4291–4298. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Larsen M., Bidstrup T., Dalhoff F. (2003) CO2 storage potential of selected saline aquifers in Denmark. Danmarks og Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Rapport 2003/39, 83 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Magri F., Tillner E., Wang W., Watanabe N., Zimmermann G., Kempka T. (2013) 3D Hydro-mechanical Scenario Analysis to Evaluate Changes of the Recent Stress Field as a Result of Geological CO2 Storage, Energy Procedia 4, 375–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Moos D., Zoback M.D. (1990) Utilization of observation of well bore failure to constrain the orientation and magnitude of crustal stresses: application to continental deep sea drilling project and ocean drilling program boreholes, Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 9305–9325. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nagelhout A.C.G., Roest J.P.A. (1997) Investigating fault slip in a model of an underground gas storage facility, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 34, 3–4, Paper No. 212. [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen L.H. (2003) Late Triassic – Jurassic development of the DanishBasin and the Fennoscandian Border Zone, southern Scandinavia, Ineson J.R., Surlyk F. (eds), The Jurassic of Denmark and Greenland, Geological Survey of Denmark Bulletin 38, 459–526. [Google Scholar]
  • Nielsen C.M., Frykman P., Dalhoff F. (2013) Synergy Benefits in Combining CCS and Geothermal Energy Production, Energy Procedia 37, 2622–2628. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ouellet A., Bérard T., Frykman P., Welsh P., Minton J., Pamucku Y. (2010). Reservoir geomechanics case study of seal integrity under CO2 storage conditions at Ketzin, Germany, Ninth Annual Conference on Carbon Capture and Sequestration 2010, 10-13 May. [Google Scholar]
  • Röhmann L., Tillner E., Magri F., Kühn M., Kempka T. (2013) Fault Reactivation and Ground Surface Uplift Assessment at a Prospective German CO2 Storage Site, Energy Procedia 40, 437–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Schlumberger (2012) Petrel Seismic-To-Evaluation Software, Version 2011.1, Schlumberger Information Solutions. [Google Scholar]
  • Schlumberger (2007) ECLIPSE 100, Schlumberger Information Solutions. [Google Scholar]
  • Tillner E., Kempka T., Nakaten B., Kühn M. (2013a) Geological CO2 Storage Supports Geothermal Energy Exploitation: 3D Numerical Models Emphasize Feasibility of Synergetic Use, Energy Procedia 37, 6604–6616. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tillner E., Kempka T., Nakaten B., Kühn M. (2013b) Brine migration through fault zones: 3D numerical simulations for a prospective CO2 storage site in Northeast Germany, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 19, 689–703. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vidal-Gilbert S., Nauroy J.F., Brosse E. (2009) 3D geomechanical modelling for CO2 geologic storage in the Dogger carbonates of the Paris Basin, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 3, 288–299. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.