Dossier: Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration and Hydrocarbon Production
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 67, Number 2, March-April 2012
Dossier: Monitoring of CO2 Sequestration and Hydrocarbon Production
Page(s) 289 - 301
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2012004
Published online 23 April 2012
  • Aki K., Richards P.G. (2002) Quantitative Seismology, 2nd edition, W.H. Freeman and Company. [Google Scholar]
  • Arts R., Eiken O., Chadwick A., Zweigel P., van der Meer L., Zinszner B. (2004) Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data, Energy 29, 9-10, 1383-1392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baudrier E., Millon G., Nicolier F., Ruan S. (2008) Binary image comparison with local dissimilarity quantification, Pattern Recognition 41, 5, 1461-1478. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Butler R.M. (1991) Thermal recovery of oil and bitumen, Prentice Hall, Englewoods Cliffs, New Jersey, 528 p [Google Scholar]
  • Byerley G., Barham G., Tomberlin T., Vandal B. (2009) 4D seismic monitoring applied to SAGD operations at Surmont, Alberta, Canada, SEG Expanded Abstracts 28. DOI :10.1190/1.3255695. [Google Scholar]
  • Carrera J., Alcolea A., Augustin A., Hidalgo J., Slooten L.J. (2005) Inverse problem in hydrology, Hydrogeol. J. 13, 206-222. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chilès J.P., Delfiner P. (1999) Geostatistics : Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, Wiley, New York, 695 pp. [Google Scholar]
  • Ciz R., Shapiro S.A. (2007) Generalization of Gassmann equations for porous media saturated with a solid material, Geophysics 72, 6, A75-A79. DOI : 10.1190/1.2772400. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Da Veiga S., Le Ravalec M., Tillier E., Enchery G., Gervais V. (2011) Selection of consistent geological models from 3D seismic and petro-elastic modeling, EAGE/SPE Joint Workshop 2011 Closing the Loop : Reservoir Simulation & Geophysical Measurements, Istanbul, Turkey, 4-6 April. [Google Scholar]
  • Delépine N., Labat K., Clochard V., Ricarte P., Le Bras C. (2010) 4D joint pre-stack seismic stratigraphic inversion of the Sleipner-CO2 case, K009, EAGE, Barcelona, Spain. [Google Scholar]
  • Doligez B., Beucher H., Lerat O., Souza O. (2007) Use of a Seismic Derived Constraint : Different Steps and Joined Uncertainties in the Construction of a Realistic Geological Model, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. 62, 2, 237-248. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [OGST] [Google Scholar]
  • Dong Y., Oliver D.S. (2005) Quantitative use of 4D seismic data for reservoir characterization, SPE J. 10, 1, 91-99. DOI : 10.2118/84571-PA. [Google Scholar]
  • Eastwood J., Lebel J.P., Dilay A., Blackeslee S. (1994) Seismic monitoring of steam-based recovery of bitumen, Lead. Edge 4, 242-251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fornel A., Mezghani M., Langlais V. (2007) Using production data and time domain seismic attributes for history matching, Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 284, 147-159. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Journel A.G., Gundeso R., Gringarten E., Yao T. (1998) Stochastic modelling of a fluvial reservoir : a comparative review of algorithms, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 21, 95-121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Loc’h G., Galli A. (1997) Truncated Plurigaussian method : theoretical and practical points of view, Geostatistics Wollongong’96, Baafi E.Y., Schofields N.A. (eds), Kluwe, pp. 211-222. [Google Scholar]
  • Lerat O., Adjemian F., Baroni A., Etienne G., Renard G., Bathelier E., Forgues E., Aubin F., Euzen T. (2010) Modelling of 4D Seismic Data for the Monitoring of Steam Chamber Growth During the SAGD Process, J. Can. Pet. Technol. 49, 6, 21-30. [Google Scholar]
  • LeRavalec-Dupin M. (2010) Pilot block method methodology to calibrate stochastic permeability fields to dynamic data, Math. Geosci. 42, 2, 165-185. DOI : 10.1007/s11004-009-9249-x. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Le Ravalec M., Da Veiga S., Derfoul R., Enchéry G., Gervais V., Roggero F. (2011) Integrating data of different types and different supports into reservoir models, Les Rencontres scientifiques d’IFP Energies nouvelles : Flows and mechanics in natural porous media from pore to field scale Pore2Field, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 16-18 November. [Google Scholar]
  • Lumley D.E. (2001) Time-lapse seismic reservoir monitoring, Geophysics 66, 1, 50-53. DOI : 10.1190/1.1444921. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • MacQueen J.B. (1967) Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations, Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1, 281-297. [Google Scholar]
  • Mezghani M., Fornel A., Langlais V., Lucet N. (2004) History Matching and Quantitative Use of 4D Seismic Data for an Improved Reservoir Characterization, SPE ATCE, 2004, Houston, Texas, USA, SPE 90420. DOI : 10.2118/90420-MS. [Google Scholar]
  • Mindlin R.D., (1949) Compliance of Elastic Bodies in contact, J. Appl. Mech. 16, 259-268. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliver D., Chen Y. (2010) Recent progress on reservoir history matching : a review, Math. Geosci. 15, 1, 185-221. DOI : 10.1007/s10596-010-9194-2. [Google Scholar]
  • Ponsot-Jacquin C., Roggero F., Enchéry G. (2009) Calibration of Facies Proportions through a History-matching Process, Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. 180, 5, 387-397. DOI : 10.2113/gssgfbull.180.5.387. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Roggero F., Ding D.Y., Berthet P., Lerat O., Cap J., Schreiber P.E. (2007) Matching of production history and 4D seismic data – Application to the Girassol field, offshore Angola. SPE ATCE, Anaheim, CA, USA, SPE 109929. [Google Scholar]
  • Sinoquet D., Delbos F. (2008) Adapted nonlinear optimization method for production and 4d seismic inversion, in 11th European Conference on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, Bergen, Norway, 8-12 September. [Google Scholar]
  • Stephen K.D., Soldo J., MacBeth C., Christie M. (2006) Multiplemodel seismic and production history matching : a case study, SPE J. 11, 4, 418-430. DOI : 10.2118/94173-PA. [Google Scholar]
  • Tarantola A. (1987) Inverse problem theory – Methods for data fitting and model parameter estimation, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 613 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Tillier E., Enchéry G., Le Ravalec M., Gervais V. (2010) Local and continuous updating of facies proportions for history matching, J. Petrol. Geosci. Eng. 73, 194-203. DOI : 10.1016/j.petrol2010.05.014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tillier E., Le Ravalec M., Roggero F. (2011) Using time domain seismic data for history matching processes, First Break 29, 3, 47-53. [Google Scholar]
  • Vasco D.W., Datta-Gupta A., Behrens R., Condon P., Rickett J. (2004) Seismic imaging of reservoir flow properties : Time-lapse amplitude changes, Geophysics 69, 6, 1425-1442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.