Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 67, Number 1, January-February 2012
Page(s) 161 - 178
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2011170
Published online 17 February 2012
  • Algive L., Békri S., Lerat O., Nader F.H., Vizika O. (2009a) Reactive pore network modeling technology to evaluate the impact of diagenesis on the petrophysical properties of a rock, Paper IPTC 14049 presented at the International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha, Qatar, 7-9 December. [Google Scholar]
  • Algive L., Békri S., Vizika O. (2009b) Reactive pore network modeling dedicated to the determination of the petrophysical property changes while injecting CO2, SPE Paper 124305 presented at the SPE Annual Technical conference and Exhibition, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 4-7 October. [Google Scholar]
  • Alsharhan A.S. (1989) Petroleum geology of the United Arab Emirates, J. Petrol. Geol. 12, 3, 253-288. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Appold M.S., Garven G., Boles J.R., Eichhubl P. (2007) Numerical modeling of the origin of calcite mineralization in the Refugio- Carneros fault, Santa Barbara Basin, California, Geofluids 7, 79-95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bemer E., Lombard J.M. (2010) From injectivity to integrity studies of CO2 geological storage, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Revue IFP 65, 3, 445-459. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Brosse E., Magnier C., Vincent B. (2005) Modelling fluid-rock interaction induced by the percolation of CO2-enriched solutions in core samples : the role of reactive surface area, Oil Gas Sci. Technol. - Revue IFP 60, 2, 287-305. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Cantrell D.L., Hagerty R.M. (2003) Reservoir rock classification, Arab-D reservoir, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia, GeoArabia 8, 3, 435-462. [Google Scholar]
  • Christman P.G., Edgar T.F. (1983) Distributed pore size model for sulfatation of limestone, Am. Institute Chem. Eng. 29, 3, 388-395. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Coelho A.A. (2007) Topas Academic v4.1, http ://members.optusnet. com.au/~alancoelho/. [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrenberg S.N. (2006) Porosity destruction in carbonate platforms, J. Petrol. Geol. 29, 1, 41-52. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ehrenberg S.N., Nadeau P.H., Aqrawi A.A.M. (2007) A comparison of Khuff and Arab reservoir potential throughout the Middle East, AAPG Bull. 91, 3, 275-286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fatt I. (1965) The network model of porous media, The American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers Transactions 207, 144-181. [Google Scholar]
  • Izgec O., Zhu D., Hill A.D. (2010) Numerical and experimental investigation of acid wormholing during acidization of vuggy carbonate rocks, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 74, 51-66. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knackstedt M.A., Arns C., Ghous A., Sakellariou A., Senden T., Sheppard A.P., Sok R.M., Averdunk H., Pinczewski W.V., Padhy G.S., Ioannidis M.A. (2006) 3D imaging and flow characterization of the pore space of carbonate core samples, Paper SCA 2006-23 presented at the International Symposium of Core Analysts, Trondheim, Norway, 12-16 September. [Google Scholar]
  • Laroche C., Vizika O. (2005) Two-phase flow properties prediction from small-scale data using pore-network modeling, Transport Porous Med. 61, 77-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Li L., Peters C.A., Celia M.A. (2006) Upscaling geochemical reaction rates using pore-scale network modeling, Adv. Water Resour. 29, 1351-1370. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lindsay R.F., Cantrell D.L., Hughes G.W., Keith T.H., Mueller H.W., Russell S.D. (2006) Ghawar Arab-D reservoir : widespread porosity in shoaling-upward carbonate cycles, Saudi Arabia, in Giant hydrocarbon reservoirs of the world : from rocks to reservoir characterization and modeling, AAPG Memoir 88/SEPM Special Publication, Harris P.M., Weber L.J. (eds), pp. 97-137. [Google Scholar]
  • Lønøy A. (2006) Making sense of carbonate pore systems, AAPG Bull. 90, 9, 1381-1405. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucia F.J. (2007) Carbonate reservoir characterization - An integrated approach, 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 336. [Google Scholar]
  • Meyer F.O., Price R.C. (1992) A new Arab-D depositional model, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia, SPE Paper 25576, 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  • Mitchell J.C., Lehmann P.J., Cantrell D.L., Al-Jallal I.A., Al-Thagafy M.A.R. (1988) Lithofacies, diagenesis and depositional sequence; Arab-D Member, Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia, in Giant Oil and Gas Fields - A Core Workshop, Lomando A.J., Harris P.M. (eds), Society of Economic Palaeontologists and Mineralogists, Core Workshop No. 12, 459-514. [Google Scholar]
  • Moldovanyi E.P., Walter L.M. (1992). Regional trends in water chemistry, Smackover Formation, southwest Arkansas : Geochemical and physical controls, AAPG Bulletin 76, 6, 864-894. [Google Scholar]
  • Morad S., Al-Aasm I.S., Nader F.H., Ceriani A., Gasparrini M. (accepted) Diagenesis impact on the spatial and temporal distribution of reservoir properties in C and D Members of the Arab Formation (Jurassic), GeoArabia. [Google Scholar]
  • Palandri J.L., Kharaka Y.K. (2004) A compilation of rate parameters of water-mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling, USGS Report. [Google Scholar]
  • Pitzer K.S. (1973) Thermodynamics of electrolytes. I. Theoretical basis and general equations, J. Phys. Chem. 12, 268-277. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rieckmann C., Frerich K. (1997) Multicomponent diffusion and reaction in three-dimensional networks : General kinetics, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 8, 3275-3281. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schechter R.S., Gidley J.L. (1969) The change in pore size distribution from surface reactions in porous media, Am. Institute Chem. Eng. 15, 3, 339-350. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Snellings R., Machiels L., Mertens G., Elsen J. (2010) Rietveld refinement strategy for quantitative phase analysis of partially amorphous zeolitized tuffaceous rocks, Geologica Belgica 13, 3, 183-196. [Google Scholar]
  • Swart P.K., Cantrell D.L., Westphal H., Robertson Handford C., Kendall C.G. (2005) Origin of dolomite in the Arab-D reservoir from the Ghawar field, Saudi Arabia : Evidence from petrographic and geochemical constraints, J. Sediment. Res. 75, 3, 476-491. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Whitaker F.F., Smart P.L., Jones G.D. (2004) Dolomitization : from conceptual to numerical models, in The Geometry and petrogenesis of dolomite hydrocarbon reservoirs, Geological Society of London, Special Publications 235, Braithwaite C.J.R., Rizzi G., Darke G. (eds), pp. 99-139, London. [Google Scholar]
  • Wood W.W., Sanford W.E., Rahman S.Al Habshi A. (2002). Source of solutes to the coastal sabkha of Abu Dhabi, GSA Bulletin 114, 3, 259-268. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Youssef S., Han M., Bauer D., Rosenberg E., Bekri S., Fleury M., Vizika O. (2008) High resolution ì-CT combined to numerical models to assess electrical properties of bimodal carbonates, Paper SCA 2008 - Temp Paper#A54 presented at the International Symposium of Core Analysts, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 29-30 October. [Google Scholar]
  • Youssef S., Rosenberg E., Gland N., Bekri S., Vizika O. (2007a) Quantitative 3D characterisation of the pore space of real rocks : improved μ-CT resolution and pore extraction methodology, Paper SCA 2007-17 presented at the International symposium of the Society of Core Analysts, Calgary, Canada, 10-12 September. [Google Scholar]
  • Youssef S., Rosenberg E., Gland N., Skalinski M., Vizika O. (2007b) High resolution CT and pore-network models to assess petrophysical properties of homogeneous and heterogeneous carbonates, Paper SPE 111427 presented at the SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi, U.A.E., 28-31 October. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.