Open Access
Issue
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP
Volume 55, Number 5, September-October 2000
Page(s) 501 - 509
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst:2000037
Published online 01 October 2006
  • Achia, B.U. et Thompson, D.W. (1977) Structures of Turbulent Boundary in Drag-Reducing Pipe Flow. J. Fluid Mech., 81, 439-464. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Baid, K.M. et Metzner, A.B. (1977) Rheological Properties of Dilute Polymer Solutions Determined in Extensional and in Shearing Experiments. Trans. Soc. Rheol., 21, 237-260. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Beaty, W.R., Johnston, R.L., Kramer, R.L., Warnock, L.G. et Wheeler, G.R. (1984) Drag Reducers Increase Flow in Offshore Pipelines without Additional Expansion. Oil & Gas Journal, 71-74. [Google Scholar]
  • Berman, N.S. et Georges, W.K. (1974) Onset of Drag Reduction in Dilute Polymer Solutions. Phys. Fluids, 17, 250-251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Berman, N.S. (1978) Drag Reduction by Polymers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech., 10, 47-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bewersdorff, H.W. (1982) Rheol. Acta, 21, 587-589. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bewersdorff, H.W. (1990) Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction, IUTAM Symposium, Zurich, Gyr, A. (éd.), 266, 941. [Google Scholar]
  • Bewersdorff, H.W. et Ohlendorf, D. (1988) Colloid and Polymer Sci., 266, 941. [Google Scholar]
  • Blasius, H. (1913) Mitt. Forschungarb., 131, 1. [Google Scholar]
  • Blatch, N.S. (1906) Water Filtration at Washington. Trans. ASCE, 57, 400. [Google Scholar]
  • Briant, J. (1988) Ph譯m筥s d’interface, agents de surface, Éd. Technip. [Google Scholar]
  • Forrest, F. et Grierson, G.A.H. (1931) Friction Losses in Cast Iron Pipes Carrying Paper Stock. Paper Trade J., 298. [Google Scholar]
  • Gyr, A. (1990) Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction, IUTAM Symposium, Zurich, Gyr, A. (Éd.). [Google Scholar]
  • Hoyt, J.W. et Sellin, R.H.J. (1991) Rheol. Acta, 30, 307. [Google Scholar]
  • Hunston, D.L. et Reischman, M.N. (1975) The Role of Polydispersity in the Mechanism of Drag Reduction. Phys. Fluids, 18, 1626-1630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • James, D.F. et Saringer, J.H. (1980) Extensional Flow of Dilute Polymer Solutions. J. Fluid Mech., 97, 655-671. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kale, D.D. et Metzner, A.B. (1974) Turbulent Drag Reduction in Fiber-Polymer Systems: Specificity Considerations. AIChE J., 20, 1218. [Google Scholar]
  • Kale, D.D. et Metzner, A.B. (1976) Turbulent Drag Reduction in Dilute Fiber Suspensions: Mechanistic Considerations. AIChE J., 22, 4, 669-674. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • McComb, W.D. et Rabie, L.H. (1982) Local Drag Reduction Due to Injection of Polymer Solutions into Turbulent Flow in a Pipe. AIChE J., 28, 547-565. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mysels, K.J. (1949) US Patent 2 492 173. [Google Scholar]
  • Nikuradse (1933) Forschungsheft, 361, VDI Verlog, Berlin. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith, R.E. et Tiederman, W.G. (1991) Rheol. Acta, 30, 103-113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tanner (1988) Engineering Rheology, Clarendon Press, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
  • Toms, B.A. (1977) On the Early Experiments on Drag Reduction by Polymers. Phys. Fluids, 20, 10, II, S3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Usui, H. (1990) Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction, IUTAM Symposium, Zurich, Gyr, A. (Éd.). [Google Scholar]
  • Virk, P.S. (1975) Drag Reduction Fundamentals. AIChE J., 21, 4, 625-657. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Virk, P.S. (1990) Structure of Turbulence and Drag Reduction, IUTAM Symposium, Zurich, Gyr, A. (袮). [Google Scholar]
  • Vleggaar, J. et Tels, M. (1973) Chem. Eng. Sci., 28, 965-968. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wells, C.S. et Spangler, J.G. (1967) Injection of Drag-Reducing Fluid into Turbulent Pipe Flow of a Newtonian Fluid. Phys. Fluids, 10, 1890. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.