Subsurface Fluid Injection and Energy Storage
Open Access
Editorial
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 76, 2021
Subsurface Fluid Injection and Energy Storage
Article Number E2
Number of page(s) 2
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2021049
Published online 23 November 2021

In the current global environmental problems, reducing CO2 emissions is an important goal and guide for countries all over the world in developing environmental and economic policies. It has become a global consensus to jointly promote greenhouse gas emission reduction. From 1970 to 2004, CO2 emissions increased yearly, accounting for 76% of the total emissions in 2004. According to the prediction of the International Energy Agency (IEA), the total global CO2 emission reached a record of 30 billion tons in 2010. In 2005, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) specially recommended Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology to achieve significant emission reduction of greenhouse gases. In 2007, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) identified CCS as one of the six ways to deal with global climate change. The global climate conference in Cancun in 2010 incorporated CCS into the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM). The United States, Canada, the European Union, and other countries have taken CCS as an important part of future energy strategies and carbon emission reduction strategies and have formulated corresponding technology research plans that include Research and Development (R&D) and project demonstration. The NET-Zero Emissions (NZE) scenario proposed by the IEA for 2050 puts global CO2 capture at 1.7 gigatonnes per year in 2030 and 7.6 gigatonnes per year in 2050. Presently, CCS is a hot topic all around the world.

According to the statistical analysis of the articles published in Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Revue d’IFP Energies Nouvelles in the last 5 years (2014–2019), there are a total of 64 articles related to the CCS research field. In the resulting list, the most cited popular papers are related to policy issues, migration front capture, and analysis of geochemical reaction. To be more specific, the three most cited articles are:

  1. A review on CO2 hydrogenation to methanol [1].

  2. An experimental study for choosing suitable carbon storage sites based on the connectivity and the pore-structure separation [2].

  3. A strategy for monitoring whether CO2 is safely sequestered [3].

The other entries treat other essential topics such as flow mechanism studies, CO2 injection processes, development of new materials for oil exploration, induced seismic studies, and PVT analysis of CO2-petroleum systems.

In fact, CO2 gas from industrial waste gas is obtained and transported by truck or pipeline to the storage site, and then heated and pressurised at the surface and injected into the reservoir. CO2 in factories often contains other impurities that are different from the physical chemistry of pure CO2. The suitable target reservoir mainly contains deep saline aquifer, abandoned oil/gas reservoirs, coalbed methane reservoirs, and deep ocean. At the same time, CO2 can also be used as a source of energy that can help in oil shale gas development, uranium mining, geothermal exploitation and act as a cushion gas for the power-to-gas project. To accurately calculate the carbon storage capacity and utilization efficiency, the reservoir injectivity, the stability of the reservoir cap and the storage safety should be taken into account in the carbon injection project. Significant scientific and technical challenges must be solved to securely and safely develop subsurface fluid injection and energy storage. Once CO2 is injected underground, the key scientific questions are listed below:

  • Capture the migration front of subsurface fluids, especially in heterogeneous formations.

  • Evaluate the effect of geochemical reactions on the physical structure of the formation.

  • Reveal the mechanism of fluid-solid coupling during injection and post-injection stages.

  • Analyse the influence of stratigraphic structures (such as faults) on the safety and stability of storage.

  • Explore the physical and chemical reactions of subsurface fluids with impurities such as H2S.

This topical issue with the focus on “Subsurface Fluid Injection and Energy Storage” contributes to the aim of the journal OGST to publish research in all related fields like exploration and production of petroleum, natural gas, and other sources of energy and in particular alternative energies in view of the energy transition. Ambitious climate and energy targets are set in many countries around the world. To enable the renewable energy resources to become the central pillar of the future energy supply, the utilization of the geological subsurface obtains a new relevance. In this view, especially energy storage is of utmost importance with increasing demands to utilize geological reservoirs. Various manuscripts are collected here which outline the broad field of research in that regard.

Zhang et al. [4] address the impact assessment of interlayers on affecting the heterogeneity of the reservoir in the Songliao Basin, China. This study is beneficial to provide guidance and advice for selecting a suitable CO2 geological storage reservoir. The caprock sealing performance plays a key role in determining permanence and security of CO2 geological storage. Ma et al. [5] present geochemical modeling of CO2–brine–rock interactions in a deep saline aquifer in the Jianghan Basin, Hubei Province, China. Li and Ma [6] reported the influence of pore system change during CO2 storage on 4D seismic interpretation, and the proposed methodology is expected to be used in China’s Shengli Oilfield CO2-EOR project. Zhang et al. [7] used the the TMVR_EOSG module of the TOUGHREACT code to simulate the feasibility of acid gas (59% CO2 and 41% H2S) injection in a carbonate formation of the Tarim Basin, Xinjiang, China. The results could be used as guidance for future acid gas injection operations. Liu et al. [8] used the ECO2N module of the TOUGH2MP simulator to investigate temperature and pressure responses in the geothermal reservoir while considering the cooling effect induced by injection of CO2 and cooled geothermal water. This study enhanced the understanding of low-medium geothermal reservoirs in Binhai district, Tianjin, China. Zhou et al. [9] studied the formation mechanism of authigenic chlorite in tight sandstone and its effect on tight oil adsorption during hydrocarbon filling in Yanchang Formation, southwest region of Ordos Basin, China.

Wei et al. [10] studied fault slippage and its permeability evolution during supercritical CO2 fracturing in layered formation. Major result is that due to limited determined fault slippage in combination with lower initial permeability, the CO2 fracturing operation near undetected small faults could not conduct preferential pathway for upward CO2 leakage or contaminate overlying shallower potable aquifers.

All in all a step forward but further research is needed. The focus will be on the coupled interaction of processes during flow in porous media studied by laboratory and field experiments and numerical simulations. Of specific interest are flooding mechanisms and injectivity, induced seismicity, hydrate formation, wellbore failures, caprock integrity, hydraulic fracturing, risk assessment, etc. Solving each of the issues is intended to make a better understanding of subsurface fluid injection and energy storage projects around the world.

References


© Q. Li & M. Kühn, published by IFP Energies nouvelles, 2021

Licence Creative CommonsThis is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.