Coupling Fluid Flow and Rock Mechanics: Formulations of the Partial Coupling Between Reservoir and Geomechanical Simulators
Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP, 57 4 (2002) 355-367
Published online: 2006-12-01
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Geomechanical modeling of CO2 sequestration: A review focused on CO2 injection and monitoring
Sikandar Khan, Yehia Khulief, Ruben Juanes, Salem Bashmal, Muhammad Usman and Abdullatif Al-ShuhailJournal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 12 (3) 112847 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2024.112847
Seepage effect on progressive failure of shield tunnel face in granular soils by coupled continuum-discrete method
Shiqin Tu, Wei Li, Chengping Zhang, Libin Wang, Zixian Jin and Saixu WangComputers and Geotechnics 166 106009 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.106009
Hydromechanical simulation of a carbonate petroleum reservoir using pseudo-coupling
Flavia Falcao, E.A. Vargas, Raquel Velloso and Antonio Claudio SoaresGeoenergy Science and Engineering 237 212769 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212769
Review of Carbon dioxide utilization and sequestration in depleted oil reservoirs
Xianmin Zhou, Yu-Shu Wu, Hao Chen, Mahmoud Elsayed, Wei Yu, Xinrui Zhao, Mobeen Murtaza, Muhammad Shahzad Kamal, Sarmad Zafar Khan, Ridha Al-Abdrabalnabi and Bo RenRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 202 114646 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114646
Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical (THM) Modelling of Short-Term Gas Storage in a Depleted Gas Reservoir—A Case Study from South Germany
Muhammad Zain-Ul-Abedin and Andreas HenkEnergies 16 (8) 3389 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083389
Assessing the viability of CO2 storage in offshore formations of the Gulf of Mexico at a scale relevant for climate-change mitigation
Josimar A. Silva, Lluís Saló-Salgado, Joseph Patterson, Ganeswara R. Dasari and Ruben JuanesInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 126 103884 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2023.103884
Evaluation of accuracy and convergence of numerical coupling approaches for poroelasticity benchmark problems
Maria Warren, James E. Bean, Mario J. Martinez, Alec Kucala and Hongkyu YoonGeomechanics for Energy and the Environment 31 100352 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2022.100352
Evaluating geomechanical effects related to the production of a Brazilian reservoir
Raquel Oliveira Lima, Leonardo José do Nascimento Guimarães and Leonardo Cabral PereiraJournal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology 11 (6) 2661 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-021-01190-6
Field-scale fully coupled simulation of fluid flow and geomechanics: Gas storage/recovery process in a depleted sandstone reservoir
Behnam Nasrollahzadeh, Hossein Ali Akhlaghi Amiri and Siavash GhabezlooJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 200 108423 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108423
A novel iterative method based on fixed stress rates for hydromechanical problems with nonlinear constitutive relationships
R. Quevedo and D. RoehlComputers and Geotechnics 130 103887 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103887
Response of Upper Jurassic (Malm) Limestone to Temperature Change: Experimental Results on Rock Deformation and Permeability
Liang Pei, Guido Blöcher, Harald Milsch, et al.Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 54 (1) 337 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02270-5
A consistent framework for coupling modern reservoir flow simulator with mechanics
A. Ferrari, A. Pizzolato, S. Petroselli, S. Monaco and D. OttavianiIOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 833 (1) 012113 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/833/1/012113
Intrinsic material constants of poroelasticity
Alexander H.D. ChengInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 142 104754 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104754
Coupling 3D geomechanics to classical sedimentary basin modeling: From gravitational compaction to tectonics
A. Brüch, D. Colombo, J. Frey, et al.Geomechanics for Energy and the Environment 28 100259 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2021.100259
Impact of tectonic shortening on fluid overpressure in petroleum system modelling: Insights from the Neuquén basin, Argentina
J. Berthelon, A. Brüch, D. Colombo, et al.Marine and Petroleum Geology 127 104933 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.104933
Numerical modeling of two-phase flow in deformable porous media: application to CO$$_2$$ injection analysis in the Otway Basin, Australia
Taehyun Kim, Chan-Hee Park, Norihiro Watanabe, et al.Environmental Earth Sciences 80 (3) (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-09411-1
IPACS: Integrated Phase-Field Advanced Crack Propagation Simulator. An adaptive, parallel, physics-based-discretization phase-field framework for fracture propagation in porous media
Mary F. Wheeler, Thomas Wick and Sanghyun LeeComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 367 113124 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113124
The Groundbreaking Experiment in Earthquake Control at Rangely, Colorado, Revisited
H. Byrne, J. A. Silva, A. Plesch, R. Juanes and J. H. ShawGeophysical Research Letters 47 (11) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088257
Modelling Rock Fracturing Processes
Jonny RutqvistModelling Rock Fracturing Processes 203 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35525-8_9
Efficient Coupled Multiphase-Flow and Geomechanics Modeling of Well Performance and Stress Evolution in Shale-Gas Reservoirs Considering Dynamic Fracture Properties
Lijun Liu, Yongzan Liu, Jun Yao and Zhaoqin HuangSPE Journal 25 (03) 1523 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.2118/200496-PA
Adaptive asynchronous time-stepping, stopping criteria, and a posteriori error estimates for fixed-stress iterative schemes for coupled poromechanics problems
Elyes Ahmed, Jan Martin Nordbotten and Florin Adrian RaduJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 364 112312 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2019.06.028
Evolution Model for the Absheron Mud Volcano: From Stratified Sediments to Fluid Mud Generation
Arthur Blouin, Nabil Sultan, Alexandra Pierron, Patrice Imbert and Jean‐Paul CallotJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 125 (12) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JF005623
Numerical modelling of coupled single-phase fluid flow and geomechanics in a fractured porous media
Manojkumar Gudala and Suresh Kumar GovindarajanJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 191 107215 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107215
Numerical Modeling of Coupled Fluid Flow and Geomechanical Stresses in a Petroleum Reservoir
Suresh Kumar Govindarajan and Manojkumar GudalaJournal of Energy Resources Technology 142 (6) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4045832
A two-stage preconditioner for multiphase poromechanics in reservoir simulation
Joshua A. White, Nicola Castelletto, Sergey Klevtsov, et al.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 357 112575 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2019.112575
Analytical and experimental investigation of pore pressure induced strain softening around boreholes
Adelina Lv, Hamed Lamei Ramandi, Hossein Masoumi, et al.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 113 1 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.11.001
Role of Well Operations and Multiphase Geomechanics in Controlling Fault Stability During CO2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery
Xiaoxi Zhao and Birendra JhaJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 124 (7) 6359 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB017298
An Assessment of Stress States in Passive Margin Sediments: Iterative Hydro-Mechanical Simulations on Basin Models and Implications for Rock Failure Predictions
Antoine Bouziat, Nicolas Guy, Jérémy Frey, Daniele Colombo, Priscille Colin, Marie-Christine Cacas-Stentz and Tristan CornuGeosciences 9 (11) 469 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9110469
(2019)
https://doi.org/10.2118/194346-MS
Stability of multirate explicit coupling of geomechanics with flow in a poroelastic medium
T. Almani, K. Kumar, G. Singh and M.F. WheelerComputers & Mathematics with Applications 78 (8) 2682 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2019.04.007
Unified thermo-compositional-mechanical framework for reservoir simulation
T. T. Garipov, P. Tomin, R. Rin, D. V. Voskov and H. A. TchelepiComputational Geosciences 22 (4) 1039 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-018-9737-5
Coupled Numerical Modeling of Gas Hydrate‐Bearing Sediments: From Laboratory to Field‐Scale Analyses
Marcelo Sánchez, Carlos Santamarina, Mehdi Teymouri and Xuerui GaiJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 123 (12) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015966
Fluid Flow in the Subsurface
Hui-Hai LiuTheory and Applications of Transport in Porous Media, Fluid Flow in the Subsurface 28 103 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43449-0_3
An overview of TOUGH-based geomechanics models
Jonny RutqvistComputers & Geosciences 108 56 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.09.007
(2017)
https://doi.org/10.2118/182610-MS
Convergence and error analysis of fully discrete iterative coupling schemes for coupling flow with geomechanics
T. Almani, K. Kumar and M. F. WheelerComputational Geosciences 21 (5-6) 1157 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9691-7
Stress and pore pressure histories in complex tectonic settings predicted with coupled geomechanical-fluid flow models
Joshua Obradors-Prats, Mohamed Rouainia, Andrew C. Aplin and Anthony J.L. CrookMarine and Petroleum Geology 76 464 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.03.031
(2016)
https://doi.org/10.2118/181883-MS
Convergence analysis of multirate fixed-stress split iterative schemes for coupling flow with geomechanics
T. Almani, K. Kumar, A. Dogru, G. Singh and M.F. WheelerComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 311 180 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2016.07.036
A continuum‐discrete model using Darcy's law: formulation and verification
Majid Goodarzi, Chung Yee Kwok and Leslie George ThamInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 39 (3) 327 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2319
Comparison of two simulators to investigate thermal–hydraulic–mechanical processes related to nuclear waste isolation in saliferous formations
Laura Blanco Martín, Ralf Wolters, Jonny Rutqvist, Karl-Heinz Lux and Jens T. BirkholzerComputers and Geotechnics 66 219 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.021
(2015)
https://doi.org/10.2118/SPE-173374-MS
Numerical convergence study of iterative coupling for coupled flow and geomechanics
Andro Mikelić, Bin Wang and Mary F. WheelerComputational Geosciences 18 (3-4) 325 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9393-8
A fully coupled multiphase flow and geomechanics solver for highly heterogeneous porous media
Daegil Yang, George J. Moridis and Thomas A. BlasingameJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 270 417 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2013.12.029
Coupled Modeling of Multiphase Flow and Fault Poromechanics During Geologic CO2 Storage
Birendra Jha and Ruben JuanesEnergy Procedia 63 3313 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.360
Modeling Fractures in a Poro-Elastic Medium
Benjamin Ganis, Vivette Girault, Mark Mear, Gurpreet Singh and Mary WheelerOil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles 69 (4) 515 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013171
Coupled multiphase flow and poromechanics: A computational model of pore pressure effects on fault slip and earthquake triggering
Birendra Jha and Ruben JuanesWater Resources Research 50 (5) 3776 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015175
Finite volume coupling strategies for the solution of a Biot consolidation model
Roza Asadi, Behzad Ataie-Ashtiani and Craig T. SimmonsComputers and Geotechnics 55 494 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.09.014
Direct and indirect laboratory measurements of poroelastic properties of two consolidated sandstones
Guido Blöcher, Thomas Reinsch, Alireza Hassanzadegan, Harald Milsch and Günter ZimmermannInternational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 67 191 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2013.08.033
(2013)
https://doi.org/10.2118/163601-MS
(2013)
https://doi.org/10.2118/164657-MS
A new locally conservative numerical method for two-phase flow in heterogeneous poroelastic media
Marcio A. Murad, Marcio Borges, Jesus A. Obregón and Maicon CorreaComputers and Geotechnics 48 192 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.06.010
Coupled Hydro-mechanical Processes Associated with Multiphase Flow in a Dual-continuum System: Formulations and an Application
Hui-Hai Liu and Jonny RutqvistRock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 46 (5) 1103 (2013)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-012-0313-3
(2013)
https://doi.org/10.2118/165409-MS
A space–time multiscale method for computing statistical moments in strongly heterogeneous poroelastic media of evolving scales
Juarez S. Azevedo, Márcio A. Murad, Marcio R. Borges and Saulo P. OliveiraInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 90 (6) 671 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.3336
Coupled flow and geomechanical analysis for gas production in the Prudhoe Bay Unit L-106 well Unit C gas hydrate deposit in Alaska
Jihoon Kim, George J. Moridis and Jonny RutqvistJournal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 92-93 143 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2012.04.012
ON THE INTERFACE LAW BETWEEN A DEFORMABLE POROUS MEDIUM CONTAINING A VISCOUS FLUID AND AN ELASTIC BODY
ANDRO MIKELIĆ and MARY F. WHEELERMathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 22 (11) (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218202512500315
A fibre optic sensor for the in situ determination of rock physical properties
Thomas Reinsch, Guido Blöcher, Harald Milsch, et al.International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 55 55 (2012)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2012.06.011
Stability, Accuracy, and Efficiency of Sequential Methods for Coupled Flow and Geomechanics
J.. Kim, H.A.. A. Tchelepi and R.. JuanesSPE Journal 16 (02) 249 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.2118/119084-PA
(2011)
https://doi.org/10.2118/141268-MS
Stability and convergence of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics: Drained and undrained splits
J. Kim, H.A. Tchelepi and R. JuanesComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200 (23-24) 2094 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2011.02.011
Stability and convergence of sequential methods for coupled flow and geomechanics: Fixed-stress and fixed-strain splits
J. Kim, H.A. Tchelepi and R. JuanesComputer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 200 (13-16) 1591 (2011)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2010.12.022
(2010)
https://doi.org/10.2118/130425-MS
Coupled hydromechanical modeling of CO2 sequestration in deep saline aquifers
Victor Vilarrasa, Diogo Bolster, Sebastia Olivella and Jesus CarreraInternational Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 4 (6) 910 (2010)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2010.06.006
(2009)
https://doi.org/10.2118/125760-MS
Improved Compaction Modeling in Reservoir Simulation and Coupled Rock Mechanics--Flow Simulation, With Examples From the Valhall Field
Øystein Pettersen and Tron Golder KristiansenSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 12 (2) (2009)
https://doi.org/10.2118/113003-PA
(2009)
https://doi.org/10.2118/119084-MS
A Practical Iterative Scheme for Coupling Geomechanics With Reservoir Simulation
Pierre Samier, Atef Onaisi and Sergio de GennaroSPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering 11 (05) 892 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.2118/107077-PA
Using relations between stress and fluid pressure for improved compaction modelling in flow simulation and increased efficiency in coupled rock mechanics simulation
Øystein PettersenPetroleum Geoscience 14 (4) 399 (2008)
https://doi.org/10.1144/1354-079308-718
Accelerating the convergence of coupled geomechanical‐reservoir simulations
L. Jeannin, M. Mainguy, R. Masson and S. Vidal‐GilbertInternational Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 31 (10) 1163 (2007)
https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.576
(2007)
https://doi.org/10.2118/106188-MS
(2007)
https://doi.org/10.2118/107077-MS
Comparisons of Uncoupled and Various Coupling Techniques for Practical Field Examples
P. Samier, A. Onaisi and G. FontaineSPE Journal 11 (01) 89 (2006)
https://doi.org/10.2118/79698-PA
(2003)
https://doi.org/10.2118/79698-MS
(2002)
https://doi.org/10.2118/78512-MS