Table 4
Conditions and parameters used in different scenarios for the sensitivity analysis.
Base case 1 | Base case 2 | Case 1 | Cases 1–1 | Cases 1–2 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Case 4 | Case 5 | Case 6 | Case 7 | Case 8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CO2 injection pressure at the bottom hole (MPa) | 25.8 | 30 | 30 | 26 | 26 | 30 | 30 | 30 | – | – | 26 | – |
CO2 injection temperature at the bottom hole (°C) | 10 | 10 | 10 | 25 | 25 | 10 | 10 | 10 | – | – | 25 | – |
Water prod flow rate at pro1 (kg/s) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 27.8 | 2 | 27.8 |
Water prod rate at pro2 (kg/s) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 27.8 | 2 | 27.8 |
Tail water reinjection rate (kg/s) | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 27.8 | 2 | 27.8 |
Tail water reinjection flow rate at re-inj2 (kg/s) | <2 | <2 | <2 | <2 | <2 | <2 | <2 | <2 | <2 | <27.8 | <2 | <27.8 |
Tail water reinjection enthalpy at re-inj1 (kJ/kg) | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 83.96 | 125.75 | 125.75 | 125.75 | 42 | 125.75 |
Tail water reinjection enthalpy at re-inj2 (kJ/kg) | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 83.96 | 125.75 | 125.75 | 125.75 | 42 | 125.75 |
Thermal conductivity of aquifers (W/(m °C)) | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 3.5 |
Well configuration | Type I | Type I | Type II | Type II | Type II | Type III | Type III | Type III | Type IV | Type IV | Type III | Type IV |
Bottom boundary | BB1 | BB2 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 | BB1 |
Distance between production wells (km) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |