Dossier: Geosciences Numerical Methods
Open Access
Issue
Oil Gas Sci. Technol. – Rev. IFP Energies nouvelles
Volume 69, Number 4, July-August 2014
Dossier: Geosciences Numerical Methods
Page(s) 701 - 729
DOI https://doi.org/10.2516/ogst/2013158
Published online 11 June 2014
  • Coats K.H., Thomas L.K., Pierson R.G. (1998) Compositional and black oil reservoir simulation, SFE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering 1, 50990.
  • Chainais-Hillairet C., Enchéry G., Mamaghani M. (2011) Development of a refinement criterion for adaptive mesh refinement in steam-assisted gravity drainage simulation, Comput. Geosci. 15, 1, 17–34. [CrossRef]
  • Ding D., Jeannin L. (2001) A new methodology for singularity modelling in flow simulations in reservoir engineering, Comput. Geosci. 5, 93–119. [CrossRef]
  • Agélas L., Di Pietro D.A., Masson R. (2008) A symmetric and coercive finite volume scheme for multiphase porous media flow with applications in the oil industry, in Eymard R., Hérard J.-M. (eds), Finite Volumes for Complex Applications V, pp. 35–52, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-1-84821-035-6.
  • Zienkiewicz O.C., Taylor R.L. (2000) The finite element method, volume 1 (The Basis), Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 5th edition.
  • Eymard R., Gallouët T., Herbin R. (2010) Discretization of heterogeneous and anisotropic diffusion problems on general nonconforming meshes. SUSHI: a scheme using stabilization and hybrid interfaces, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 30, 4, 1009–1043. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Di Pietro D.A., Ern A., Guermond J.-L. (2008) Discontinuous Galerkin methods for anisotropic semi-definite diffusion with advection, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46, 2, 805–831. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Michel A. (2001) Convergence de schémas volumes finis pour des problèmes de convection diffusion non linéaires, PhD Thesis, Université de Provence.
  • Gallouët T., Larcher A., Latché J.C. (2012) Convergence of a finite volume scheme for the convection-diffusion equation with L1 data, Math. Comp. 81, 279, 1429–1454. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Andreianov B., Bendahmane M., Karlsen K.H. (2010) Discrete duality finite volume schemes for doubly nonlinear degenerate hyperbolic-parabolic equations, J. Hyperbolic Diff. Equ. 7, 67.
  • Cancès C., Cathala M., Le Potier C. (2012) Monotone coercive cell-centered finite volume schemes for anisotropic diffusion equations. Numer. Math. 125, 387–417. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Falgout R.D., Yang U.M. (2002) Hypre: a library of high performance preconditioners, in Preconditioners, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 632–641. [CrossRef]
  • Scheichl R., Vassilevski P.S., Zikatanov L.T. (2012) Mutilevel methods for elliptic problems with highly varying coefficients on non-aligned coarse grids, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 50, 3, 1675–1694. [CrossRef]
  • Havé P., Masson R., Nataf F., Szydlarski M., Zhao T. (2013) Algebraic domain decomposition methods for highly heterogeneous problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35, 3, C284–C302. [CrossRef]
  • Efendiev Y., Galvis J., Ki Kang S., Lazarov R.D. (2012) Robust multiscale iterative solvers for nonlinear flows in highly heterogeneous media, Numer. Math. Theory Methods Appl. 5, 3, 359–383. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ayuso de Dios B., Zikatanov L. (2009) Uniformly convergent iterative methods for discontinuous Galerkin discretizations, J. Sci. Comput. 40, 4–36. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Vohralík M., Wohlmuth B.I. (2013) Mixed finite element methods: implementation with one unknown per element, local flux expressions, positivity, polygonal meshes, and relations to other methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 23, 5, 803–838. [CrossRef]
  • Di Pietro D.A. (2013) On the conservativity of cell centered Galerkin methods, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 351, 155–159. [CrossRef]
  • Di Pietro D.A., Lemaire S. (2013) An extension of the Crouzeix-Raviart space to general meshes with application to quasi-incompressible linear elasticity and Stokes flow, Math. Comp. Accepted for publication. Preprint http://hal.archives-ovverter.fr/hal/00611997
  • Kim K.Y. (2007) A posteriori error estimators for locally conservative methods of nonlinear elliptic problems, Appl. Numer. Math. 57, 9, 1065–1080. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ern A., Nicaise S., Vohralík M. (2007) An accurate H(div) flux reconstruction for discontinuous Galerkin approximations of elliptic problems, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 345, 12, 709–712. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Di Pietro D.A., Ern A. (2011) Mathematical aspects of discontinuous Galerkin methods, volume 69 of Mathématiques & Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
  • Ainsworth M., Oden J.T. (2000) A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis. Pure and Applied Mathematics (New York), Wiley-Interscience, John Wiley & Sons, New York, ISBN 0-471-29411-X. [CrossRef]
  • Destuynder P., Métivet B. (1999) Explicit error bounds in a conforming finite element method, Math. Comp., 68, 228, 1379–1396. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Luce R., Wohlmuth B.I. (2004) A local a posteriori error estimator based on equilibrated fluxes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 42, 4, 1394–1414. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Braess D., Schöberl J. (2008) Equilibrated residual error estimator for edge elements, Math. Comp. 77, 262, 651–672. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ern A., Vohralík M. (2013) Adaptive inexact Newton methods with a posteriori stopping criteria for nonlinear diffusion PDEs, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 35, 4, A1761–A1791. [CrossRef]
  • Di Pietro D.A., Gratien J.-M. (2011) Lowest order methods for diffusive problems on general meshes: a unified approach to definition and implementation, in Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI Problems & Perspectives, Prague, Springer-Verlag, Vol. 2, pp. 3–19.
  • Di Pietro D.A., Gratien J.-M., Prud’homme C. (2013) A domain-specific embedded language in C++ for lowest-order discretizations of diffusive problems on general meshes, BIT Numerical Mathematics 53, 1, 111–152. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Grospellier G., Lelandais B. (2009) The Arcane development framework, Proceedings of the 8th workshop on Parallel/High-Performance Object-Oriented Scientific Computing POOSC ’09, pp. 4:1–4:11, New York, NY, USA, ACM.
  • Prud’homme C., Chabannes V., Doyeux V., Ismail M., Samake A., Peña G. (2012) Feel++: a computational framework for Galerkin methods and advanced numerical methods, Coquel F., Gutnic M., Helluy P., Lagoutiére F., Rohde C., Seguin N., ESAIM: Proceedings, Vol. 38, pp. 429–455. [CrossRef]
  • Flemisch B., Darcis M., Erbertseder K., Faigle B., Lauser A., Mosthaf K., Müthing S., Nuske P., Tatomir A., Wolff M., Helmig R. (2011) DuMu: DUNE for multi-Phase, Component, Scale, Physics,… Flow and transport in porous media, Adv. Water Res. 34, 9, 1102–1112. [CrossRef]
  • Bassi F., Botti L., Colombo A., Di Pietro D.A., Tesini P. (2012) On the flexibility of agglomeration based physical space discontinuous Galerkin discretizations, J. Comput. Phys. 231, 1, 45–65. [CrossRef]
  • Aavatsmark I., Barkve T., Bøe Ø., Mannseth T. (1994) Discretization on non-orthogonal, curvilinear grids for multiphase flow, Proc. of the 4th European Conf. on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, volume D, Røros, Norway.
  • Edwards M.G., Rogers C.F. (1994) A flux continuous scheme for the full tensor pressure equation, in Proc. of the 4th European Conf. on the Mathematics of Oil Recovery, volume D, Røros, Norway.
  • Agélas L., Di Pietro D.A., Droniou J. (2010) The G method for heterogeneous anisotropic diffusion on general meshes, M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 44, 4, 597–625. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet]
  • Aavatsmark I., Eigestad G.T., Mallison B.T., Nordbotten J.M. (2008) A compact multipoint flux approximation method with improved robustness, Numer. Methods Partial Differential Equations 24, 5, 1329–1360. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Aavatsmark I. (2002) An introduction to multipoint flux approximations for quadrilateral grids, Comput. Geosci. 6, 3–4, 405–432. [CrossRef]
  • Agélas L., Masson R. (2008) Convergence of the finite volume MPFA O scheme for heterogeneous anisotropic diffusion problems on general meshes, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 346, 1007–1012. [CrossRef]
  • Di Pietro D.A. (2012) Cell centered Galerkin methods for diffusive problems, M2AN Math, Model. Numer. Anal. 46, 1, 111–144. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Vohralík M. (2006) Equivalence between lowest-order mixed finite element and multi-point finite volume methods on simplicial meshes, M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 40, 2, 367–391. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet]
  • Raviart P.-A., Thomas J.-M. (1977) A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems, in Mathematical aspects of finite element methods (Proc. Conf., Consiglio Naz. delle Ricerche (C.N.R.), Rome, 1975), pp. 292–315. Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 606, Springer, Berlin.
  • Brezzi F., Fortin M. (1991) Mixed and hybrid finite element methods, Vol. 15 Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, ISBN 0387-97582-9. [CrossRef]
  • Younès A., Mosé R., Ackerer P., Chavent G. (1999) A new formulation of the mixed finite element method for solving elliptic and parabolic PDE with triangular elements, J. Comput. Phys. 149, 1, 148–167. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Hoffmann J. (2008) Equivalence of the lowest-order Raviart–Thomas mixed finite element method and the multi point flux approximation scheme on triangular grids. Preprint, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg.
  • Younès A., Fontaine V. (2008) Hybrid and multi-point formulations of the lowest-order mixed methods for Darcy’s flow on triangles, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 58, 9, 1041–1062. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Brezzi F., Lipnikov K., Shashkov M. (2005) Convergence of the mimetic finite difference method for diffusion problems on polyhedral meshes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43, 5, 1872–1896. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Brezzi F., Lipnikov K., Simoncini V. (2005) A family of mimetic finite difference methods on polygonal and polyhedral meshes, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 15, 10, 1533–1551. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Brezzi F., Lipnikov K., Shashkov M. (2006) Convergence of mimetic finite difference methods for diffusion problems on polyhedral meshes with curved faces, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 16, 275–298. [CrossRef]
  • Eymard R., Gallouët T., Herbin R. (2007) A new finite volume scheme for anisotropic diffusion problems on general grids: convergence analysis, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 344, 403–406. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Droniou J., Eymard R. (2006) A mixed finite volume scheme for anisotropic diffusion problems on any grid, Numer. Math. 105, 1, 35–71. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Di Pietro D.A. (2010) Cell centered Galerkin methods, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 348, 31–34. [CrossRef]
  • Droniou J., Eymard R., Gallouët T., Herbin R. (2010) A unified approach to mimetic finite difference, hybrid finite volume and mixed finite volume methods, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 20, 2, 265–295. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Droniou J., Eymard R., Gallouët T., Herbin R. (2013) Gradient schemes: a generic framework for the discretisation of linear, nonlinear and nonlocal elliptic and parabolic equations, Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci. 12, 13–15.
  • Bonelle J., Ern A. (2012) Analysis of compatible discrete operator schemes for elliptic problems on polyhedral meshes. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 48, 2, 553–581. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Droniou J. (2013) Finite volume schemes for diffusion equations: introduction to and review of recent methods, Math. Models Meth. Appl. Sci. Accepted for publication.
  • Allaire G. (2009) Analyse numérique et optimisation, Les Éditions de l’École Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France.
  • Di Pietro D.A., Ern A. (2010) Discrete functional analysis tools for discontinuous Galerkin methods with application to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations, Math. Comp. 79, 1303–1330. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Arnold D.N. (1982) An interior penalty finite element method with discontinuous elements, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19, 742–760. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Brenner S.C. (2003) Poincarié-Friedrichs inequalities for piecewise H1 functions, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41, 1, 306–324. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Burman E., Zunino P. (2006) A domain decomposition method for partial differential equations with non-negative form based on interior penalties, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 1612–1638. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Reed W.H., Hill T.R. (1973) Triangular mesh methods for the neutron transport equation. Technical Report LA-UR-73-0479, http://lib-www.lanl.gov/cgi-bin/getfile?00354107.pdf, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
  • Lesaint P. (1973) Finite element methods for symmetric hyperbolic equations, Numer. Math. 21, 244–255. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Lesaint P. (1975) Sur la résolution des systèmes hyperboliques du premier ordre par des méthodes d’éléments finis, PhD Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6).
  • Lesaint P., Raviart P.-A. (1974) On a finite element method for solving the neutron transport equation, in Mathematical Aspects of Finite Elements in Partial Differential Equations, pp. 89–123. Publication No. 33. Math. Res. Center, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Academic Press, New York. [CrossRef]
  • Cockburn B., Shu C.-W. (1989) TVB Runge-Kutta local projection discontinuous Galerkin finite element method for conservation laws. II. General framework, Math. Comp. 52, 186, 411–435. [MathSciNet]
  • Cockburn B., Shu C.-W. (1991) The Runge-Kutta local projection P1-discontinuous-Galerkin finite element method for scalar conservation laws, RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér. 25, 3, 337–361. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Nitsche J. (1971) Über ein Variationsprinzip zur Lösung von Dirichlet-Problemen bei Verwendung von Teilräumen, die keinen Randbedingungen unterworfen sind, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 36, 9–15. Collection of articles dedicated to Lothar Collatz on his sixtieth birthday. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Nitsche J. (1972) On Dirichlet problems using subspaces with nearly zero boundary conditions, The mathematical foundations of the finite element method with applications to partial differential equations (Proc. Sympos., Univ. Maryland, Baltimore, Md., 1972), Academic Press, New York, pp. 603–627. [CrossRef]
  • Babuška I. (1973) The finite element method with penalty, Math. Comp. 27, 221–228. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Baker G.A. (1977) Finite element methods for elliptic equations using nonconforming elements, Math. Comp. 31, 137, 45–49. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Wheeler M.F. (1978) An elliptic collocation-finite element method with interior penalties, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 15, 152–161. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Bassi F., Rebay S. (1997) A high-order accurate discontinuous finite element method for the numerical solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, J. Comput. Phys. 131, 2, 267–279. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Arnold D.N., Brezzi F., Cockburn B., Marini L.D. (2002) Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39, 5, 1749–1779. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ern A., Guermond J.-L. (2006) Discontinuous Galerkin methods for Friedrichs’ systems. I. General theory, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 2, 753–778. [CrossRef]
  • Ern A., Guermond J.-L. (2006) Discontinuous Galerkin methods for Friedrichs’ systems. II. Second-order elliptic PDEs, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 44, 6, 2363–2388. [CrossRef]
  • Ern A., Guermond J.-L. (2008) Discontinuous Galerkin methods for Friedrichs’ systems. III. Multi-field theories with partial coercivity, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46, 2, 776–804. [CrossRef]
  • Sun D.C., Wheeler M.F. (2005) L2(H1) norm a posteriori error estimation for discontinuous Galerkin approximations of reactive transport problems, J. Sci. Comp. 205, 501–530. [CrossRef]
  • Sun D.C., Wheeler M.F. (2005) Discontinuous Galerkin methods for coupled flow and reactive transport problems, Appl. Numer. Math. 52, 2-3, 283–298.
  • Bastian P., Engwer C., Fahlke J., Ippisch O. (2011) An unfitted discontinuous Galerkin method for pore-scale simulations of solute transport, Math. Comput. Simul. 81, 10, 2051–2061. [CrossRef]
  • Houston P., Schwab C., Süli E. (2002) Discontinuous hp-finite element methods for advection-diffusion-reaction problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39, 2133–2163. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Scovazzi G., Gerstenberger A., Collis S.S. (2013) A discontinuous Galerkin method for gravity-driven viscous fingering instabilities in porous media, J. Comput. Phys. 233, 373–399. [CrossRef]
  • Cancès C., Pop I.S., Vohralík M. (2014) An a posteriori error estimate for vertex-centered finite volume discretizations of immiscible incompressible two-phase flow, Math. Comp., 83, 153–188. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Di Pietro D.A., Vohralík M., Yousef S. (2012) Adaptive regularization, linearization, discretization, and a posteriori error control for the two-phase Stefan problem, Math. Comp. Accepted for publication.
  • El Alaoui L., Ern A., Vohralík M. (2011) Guaranteed and robust a posteriori error estimates and balancing discretization and linearization errors for monotone nonlinear problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 200, 37–40, 2782–2795. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ern A., Vohralík M. (2010) A posteriori error estimation based on potential and flux reconstruction for the heat equation, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 48, 1, 198–223. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ern A., Vohralík M. (2011) A unified framework for a posteriori error estimation in elliptic and parabolic problems with application to finite volumes, in Fořt J., Fürst J., Halama J., Herbin R., Hubert F. (eds), Finite Volumes for Complex Applications VI, pp. 821–837, Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-642-20670-2.
  • Hannukainen A., Stenberg R., Vohralík M. (2012) A unified framework for a posteriori error estimation for the Stokes problem, Numer. Math. 122, 4, 725–769. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Jiránek P., Strakoš Z., Vohralík M. (2010) A posteriori error estimates including algebraic error and stopping criteria for iterative solvers, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 32, 3, 1567–1590. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Vohralík M. (2008) Residual flux-based a posteriori error estimates for finite volume and related locally conservative methods, Numer. Math. 111, 1, 121–158. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Vohralík M. (2011) Guaranteed and fully robust a posteriori error estimates for conforming discretizations of diffusion problems with discontinuous coefficients, J. Sci. Comput. 46, 3, 397–438. [CrossRef]
  • Vohralík M. (2012) A posteriori error estimates for efficiency and error control in numerical simulations, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Lecture notes, Course NM497.
  • Vohralík M., Wheeler M.F. (2013) A posteriori error estimates, stopping criteria, and adaptivity for two-phase flows. Comput. Geosci. 17, 5, 789–812. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Prager W., Synge J.L. (1947) Approximations in elasticity based on the concept of function space, Quart. Appl. Math. 5, 241–269. [MathSciNet]
  • Ladevèze P. (1975) Comparaison de modèles de milieux continus, PhD Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris 6).
  • Verfurth R. (1996) A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques, Teubner-Wiley, Stuttgart. ISBN 3-519-02605-8.
  • Neittaanmäki P., Repin S. (2004) Reliable methods for computer simulation, volume 33 of Studies in Mathematics and its Applications, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. ISBN 0-444-51376-0. Error control and a posteriori estimates.
  • Repin S.I. (2008) A posteriori estimates for partial differential equations, volume 4 of Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, ISBN 978-3-11-019153-0. [CrossRef]
  • Babuška I., Rheinboldt W.C. (1978) Error estimates for adaptive finite element computations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 15, 4, 736–754. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ladevèze P., Leguillon D. (1983) Error estimate procedure in the finite element method and applications, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 20, 3, 485–509. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Carstensen C., Funken S.A. (1999) Fully reliable localized error control in the FEM, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21, 4, 1465–1484. [CrossRef]
  • Verfürth R. (2003) A posteriori error estimates for finite element discretizations of the heat equation, Calcolo 40, 3, 195–212. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Ainsworth M. (2005) A synthesis of a posteriori error estimation techniques for conforming, non-conforming and discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods, in Recent advances in adaptive computation, Vol. 383, Contemp. Math., 1-14. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI.
  • Nicaise S. (2005) A posteriori error estimations of some cell-centered finite volume methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 43, 4, 1481–1503. [CrossRef]
  • Vejchodský T. (2006) Guaranteed and locally computable a posteriori error estimate, IMA J. Numer. Anal. 26, 3, 525–540. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Becker R., Johnson C., Rannacher R. (1995) Adaptive error control for multigrid finite element methods, Computing 55, 4, 271–288. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Chaillou A.L., Suri M. (2006) Computable error estimators for the approximation of nonlinear problems by linearized models, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 196, 1–3, 210–224. [CrossRef]
  • Deuflhard P. (2004) Newton methods for nonlinear problems, volume 35 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, ISBN 3-540-21099-7. Affine invariance and adaptive algorithms.
  • Liesen J., Strakoš Z. (2013) Krylov Subspace Methods. Principles and Analysis, Numerical Mathematics and Scientific Computation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom, ISBN 978-0-19-965541-0.
  • Bernardi C., Verfürth R. (2000) Adaptive finite element methods for elliptic equations with non-smooth coefficients, Numer. Math. 85, 4, 579–608. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Hilhorst D., Vohralík M. (2011) A posteriori error estimates for combined finite volume–finite element discretizations of reactive transport equations on nonmatching grids, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 200, 5–8, 597–613. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Klieber W., Rivière B. (2006) Adaptive simulations of two-phase flow by discontinuous Galerkin methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 196, 1–3, 404–419. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  • Di Pietro D.A., Vohralík M., Yousef S. (2013) A posteriori error estimates, stopping criteria, and adaptivity for compositional multi-phase flows. Preprint HAL-00839487.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.